Weaknesses of the on Corporate Social Responsibility - Research Paper Example

Identify gaps or weaknesses of the research or outcomes from 5,000 word report Identify gaps or weaknesses of the research or outcomes from 5,000 word report This paper entails a detailed analysis of the weaknesses in a research paper on Corporate Social Responsibility. In the 5,000 words research, one finds out that Corporate Social Responsibility is a vital aspect in the society. Comprehensive research on the topic shows that it is certainly vital in the society and should be encouraged. One identifies various weaknesses in the research and measures to curb them. Weaknesses refer to the quality of lacking strength or firmness. It refers to a state of having defective or inadequate character. The researcher finds Corporate Social Responsibility as an area of major concern in the society. All people and the government should emphasize on it since it addresses many issues affecting the diverse community. Research shows that there is numerous violations to CSR and the government should undertake measures to curb it. Description of research is unfocused and thus inefficient in describing the purpose of research There are many people who question the validity and authenticity of Corporate Social Responsibility since there is evidence of contradiction between what corporations do and say. This makes the description of the research appear as unfocussed or inefficient in describing its purpose. Despite that companies adhere to the rules governing Corporate Social Responsibility, impunities persist. These include the global economic crisis and other ethical issues involving pharmaceutical companies, child labour, and sweatshops. People, therefore, do not realize the relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility in the society since impunity and corporate abuses is increasing (Westhuizen and Maree, 2009). The hypothesis is doubtful, ill-defined, and unsound as the evidence is insufficient The research does not give comprehensive analysis of a wide range of information to assess the credibility of the information. To determine whether Corporate Social Responsibility is still significant, it carries out a documentary analysis of some articles only. The research should not rely on documentary analysis of articles only but should gather information from different sources. It should gather information from websites, journals, newspapers, research, and other documentaries that will enhance the credibility of the information. This will ensure that the research is thoroughly reliable and appropriate for decision making since it is credible. The research is inconsistent in defining Corporate Social Responsibility and gives various definitions that differ. This is an indication that the research is doubtful, unsound, insufficient or ill-defined since it has inconsistencies that should not exist. This definition makes it ambiguous to decision makers and deters them from assess the impacts of its each dimension to the company (Narayan, 2002). There are various ways that the researchers should design their method of research to overcome the weaknesses or plug the gaps. One of the major ways of achieving this role is by providing sound and sufficient evidence. The researchers should gather information for or against Corporate Social Responsibility from many different sources to avoid ambiguity. They have only relied on a few documentary articles. They do not provide sufficient information that one needs to make a viable conclusion about Corporate Social Responsibility. For a paper to have credibility of information, it should ensure that it should gather information from different sources at different periods (Hoque, 2006). The fact that people question the validity and authenticity of Corporate Social Responsibility makes the description of the paper appear as unfocussed. Companies claim to follow the Corporate Social Responsibility rules, yet impunity is at the highest marked by various ethical problems in the society like child labour. This is an indication that people do not take the issue of Corporate Social Responsibility in a serious manner and just do it for the sake of enjoying others (Westhuizen and Maree, 2009). The best methodology that companies and the government should implement to proceed would be education people on Corporate Social Responsibility. After ensuring that all people are aware of it in the society, it should then strictly observe the behaviour of various organizations in the society to ensure that they follow the expectations that the government has laid down. Education on the topic is extremely vital since it will enable all companies to know what the public expects of them. This will significantly reduce their level of ignorance, and they will respond to various issues that demonstrate social responsibility (Smith and Parr, 2005). The public should also learn about social responsibility since they act as advisers to various organizations. This will ensure that they understand their rights and how companies should behave in the society. They will ensure that the companies do not undermine their responsibilities to the citizens but adhere to them. Research design Researching from many different sources is also part of the methodology that one should implement when doing this research. Research should not only focus on one source of information. To make the information credible, the company should rely on many different sources. The researchers should ensure that they gather information from different sources to enhance the credibility of their research. Results from different authors have shown that reliance on few materials when doing research leads to unsound results (Narayan, 2002). Access and ethics Ethics is particularly vital in the process of doing research. An ethical consumer is a person who has the will to incur extra cost for the products they purchase provided they support their personal ideologies. Ethics is tremendously vital as it ensures that consumer purchase quality goods that do not comprise the standards required by the society (Simkins and Fraser, 2010). This is because they are ready to incur extra costs. This ensures that people are environmentally conscious and thus will consider the impacts of economic activities to the environment. The same way, the researchers should be ethical in the process of research and ensure that the results they give are credible. They should also ensure that the results they give have positive impacts to the community (Smith and Parr, 2005). Primary or secondary data The researcher should make appropriate use of both primary and secondary data to support the hypothesis. This includes giving attention to the responses of management to new regulations. This will ensure that the researcher has perfect knowledge of the importance of the rules to the managers of organizations and how they adopt them. This is a method that will ensure that the management acquires first hand information concerning all the rules and regulations that the government impose concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (McEvoy, Pederson, and Andrew, 2011). The research should ensure that they carry out comprehensive research, which comprise of, collecting date carefully, recording it and analysing it. This will enhance the credibility of the results they obtain since they are careful in the process of doing the research. The researchers should evaluate the reliability and validity of the information they provide to the society since it may have severe implications. There are various methodologies that researchers can use to come up with primary data on Corporate Social Responsibilities. These include observation, interviewing, questionnaires, data mining, and internal documents. Observation refers to critically analyzing the behaviour of a company with respect to the various rules governing Social Responsibility. One should observe a company to ensure that it acts in accordance with the regulations and that it acts in a responsible manner (Westhuizen and Maree, 2009). An interview refers to the practice of visiting various companies and asking employees questions that should test various behaviours. This will give the researcher first hand information on how an employee behaves. The researchers should employ the use of questionnaires since they provide a reliable source of information. Professionals classify questionnaires as a primary source of data since it involves examination of employees themselves. The researchers can also obtain data via data mining from production, sales or financial records. This act as a reliable source of information that is credible. Internal documents like reports and minutes of meetings also provide relevant information concerning Corporate Social Responsibility. The researchers should critically analyze these documents since they are a reliable source of information (McEvoy, Pederson, and Andrew, 2011). Quantitative or qualitative data analysis These are the primary modes of data collection that researchers should adopt to come up with a comprehensive conclusion on Corporate Social Responsibility. Quantitative method of data analysis refers to through which one presents and interprets numerical data. Qualitative data analysis is the process where one moves from qualitative data to understanding, explanation, and interpretation philosophy. The researchers should be terribly keen to ensure that they carefully apply both qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection. They should ensure that they adopt proper interpretation to avoid misunderstandings which might result (Narayan, 2002). Possible outcomes of analysis of completion of this research Analysis of the outcomes that will result from this research is particularly vital since it enhances the credibility of information that the researchers acquire. Corporate Social Responsibility is a tremendously fundamental aspect in the society and the citizens should give it priority. The researchers should ensure that they analyse the outcomes that would result after they present the information to the people in the society (Smith and Parr, 2005). They should ensure that it has positive impacts to the community so that it does not affect the normal functioning of companies. The various outcomes that will result from analysis of completion of this research are that companies will honour Corporate Social Responsibility. One obtains a reliable research that one can use make various decisions and thus facilitating the credibility of the practice. References Westhuizen, C. Maree, K. 2009. Head Start in Designing Research Proposals in the Social. Juta and Company Ltd Smith, G. Parr, R. 2005. Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages. John Wiley & Sons McEvoy, C. Pederson, P. Andrew, D. 2011. Research Methods and Design in Sport Management. Human Kinetics Simkins, B. And Fraser, J. 2010. Enterprise Risk Management: Todays Leading Research and Best Practices for Tomorrows Executives. John Wiley & Sons Hoque, Z. 2006. Methodological Issues in Accounting Research: Theories, Methods and Issues. Spiramus Press Ltd Narayan, F. 2002. Diagnostic study of accounting and auditing practices in Sri Lanka. Asian Development Bank Read More