Imposing Quality Models and Performance Management Tools to Help an Organization to Innovate - Term Paper Example

Imposing Quality Models and Performance Management Tools to Help an Organization to Innovate 1. Introduction Whether it is a service organization or a product oriented organization, innovation is the key to business. But how an organization can reach towards a proper innovation is a question worthy indeed. A fact of competing in the business environment reveals that quality improvement via innovation and application of different management tools leads to a posture outstanding in the market. Corporate of different sizes, whether engaged in giving any service or producing any specific type of product, should implement one of the given quality models like six sigma, total quality management and ISO 9000 etc. The standard implementation of quality models and performance management techniques can create damage on the company resource & time, since people usually show resilience in implementing them but quality management training and other awareness program can help a lot in changing wrong perceptions. The seven most basic quality management tools known to the world must be there in an organization, serving their intended purposes for improvement. The players in an organization must have some common quality values, they all must follow a structured scheme for doing any project, and all must focus on customer requirements and instincts. Customer requirements and company’s objectives must be clearly identified in an organization; the employees must work as a team with decision making based on consensus. There should be a healthy environment to use fish bone diagrams, control charts & Pareto analysis in order to analyze the root cause of any problem. There should be a common habit of using Gantt chart for managing projects, and the organization should be well aware of advance quality management techniques to improve via these where applicable. 2. Quality Models Contribution for Business Excellence There are varieties of quality & management models which can be used for achieving business excellence. A balanced scorecard is a way of determining of the company's routine in opposition to its goals. The elements of a balanced scorecard are enterprise procedures, monetary ins and outs, learning, development and customer happiness. Some merits of utilizing balanced scorecards are that all the statistics are in one place and the manager can observe how he/she is doing at a glimpse. In order to create a balanced scorecard, choose a center business practice. In combination with stakeholders, choose the objectives to follow. Manuscript the present routine and generate an intentional goal. On the scorecard, manuscript the plans executed to assist accomplishment of the goal. Every month, follow progress in the direction of the goal (Ramsey, 1990). Employees are a valuable quality improvement model. They have the acquaintance of the business and comprehend its internal mechanism. Employees are conscious of both in-house and outside quality matters practiced by consumers and co-workers. For procedures that originate unremitting issues, employees have typically made a "workaround" to avoid the trouble. To employ workers as a quality improvement tool, make a questionnaire about those procedures in their sections that generate the main impact. Empower the employees to resolve those troubles that can be simply solved. Give confidence to them to job jointly inside the department and transversely with other departments to apply solutions. Consumers are essential in quality development. They can be utilized to implement the quality improvement program. Customers can be involved in quality improvement for an organization by conducting customer satisfaction surveys and asking consumers about their perception of the company's products and services, enquiring consumers how healthy the commodities carried out, and what they would get better and by analyzing the consumer answering for trends and returning themes. 3. Quality Tools For an Organization to Improve There are seven widespread Quality Tools, organizations are utilizing to comprehend and advance in processes throughout a process improvement Endeavour. Every tool aids organization to recognize basis of disparity and helps in the investigation, recording, and instituting the information, which goes to process improvement. The seven quality tools are flow charts, Fishbone Cause & Effects diagrams, data checklists, PARETO charts, histograms, scatter charts and control charts (Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa, 1986). Flowcharts, or Process Maps, evidently correspond to relationships in the midst of the actions and responsibilities that create a process. They are characteristically utilized at the opening of a process improvement scheme; one has to depict process proceedings, timing, and frequencies at the uppermost height and job downward. At elevated designations, process maps assist one to comprehend process intricacy. At subordinate designations, they assist one scrutinize and progress the procedure (RAC Publication, 1993). Ishikawa also known as Fishbone or Cause & Effect Diagrams evidently correspond to the reasons or causes of a dilemma and also covering the scope of its effect – and assist one to find out the vital cause of the problem i.e. also known as the root cause. This tool is known as “fishbone” diagram on account of its facade; and also known as Ishikawa diagram because Ishikawa was its originator. The cause-and-effect diagram is utilized at the opening of root cause analysis, to systematize the reasons generating a problem that can be populace, process, apparatus, supplies, metrological equipment, and environment and thus finally prioritize all reasons (Ozeki, Kazuo & Tetsuichi, 1990). Data Checklists or simple as check sheets, or recording tables are matrices invented to help in the adding up, capturing, and examination of test consequences or event incidences. They are used in manufacturing to tally defects and amass process statistics, which one examine to recognize prospects for advancement (Douglas McGregor, 1960). The Pareto chart is so called because of the concept initiator name Vilfredo Pareto, who emerged out with the Pareto Principle also called as 80-20 rule (Markle Garold, 2000). The Pareto says that twenty percent of the factors give a reason for eighty percent of prospective troubles. The Pareto chart prioritizes defects, causes, or statistics from chief important to the least important, in downward arrangement. Pareto charts assist one to take apart the “vital few” from the “trivial many”. They are characteristically utilized throughout process improvement investigation, to comprehend where to spotlight enhancement for the maximum impact. Histograms are composed of vertical bars, alongside; to portray frequency distributions surrounded by tables of numbers and can assist one to comprehend data associations eventually for example the recognizable “bell curve”. Histograms are usually utilized throughout process improvement scrutiny (Whitmore, 2002). Scatter charts exhibit associations connecting dependent (predicted) and independent (prediction) variables. They are utilized throughout hypothesis testing, to verify if there is a connection connecting two variables and how well-built the correlation is. Less scattering designates stronger correlation (Lucia Anntoinette, 2009). The control chart is a kind of statistical process control instrument. Process performance is spotted on graph after a while in opposition to upper and lower control limits; this assists organization keenly to recognize process variations and allows identification of special cause and ordinary cause disparity. Control charts are exploited throughout production, or subsequent to process improvement implementations, to make sure that processes are contained by control limits (Godfrey, 1999). In order to achieve innovation and continual improvement, an organization needs to draw up a process map, so everyone understands the process flow. Next to the process flow, examine the process flows for the chief causes of problems and build cause-effect diagram. Then, gather data utilizing check sheets and plot statistical data by means of a Pareto chart or a histogram. Next to the prior process, establish the association of various numerous in your cause-effect chain utilizing a scatter chart (Pyzdek, 2003). Once the problem is solved, employ a control chart to make sure that the process is staying within process control limits, show process control (Juran & Joseph M. & De Feo & Joseph, 1999) 4. Performance Management Tool The balanced scorecard has come up to turn out to be reasonably accepted in current years for the reason of its usefulness in giving correct and comprehensive evaluation of performance (Rose & Kenneth H, 2005). Such information arranged is of gigantic assistance to managers since such information gives them with goal criteria upon which to found significant policy and routine verdicts. Certainly, although, functioning with bigger organizations involves utilizing a healthy, scalable system for together collecting and exploring scorecard data. This is where a chosen scorecard means could demonstrate itself very useful (Paul H. Selden, 1998). Allen (2010) exclaims that the balanced scorecard scheme relies to a strategic management scheme that spotlights on the exercise of measurements or metrics strained from a wide group of categories. It was initially projected as an improved option to mere bearing in mind financial performance. As opposed to restricting the exercise of metrics to merely the financial outlook, three additional outlooks are taken into account (West & John E, 2009). These are the learning & development, in-house industry processes, and customer feeds. Altogether as a group, these four segments wrap approximately each important feature of an organization's performance (Westcott & Russell T, 2003). Therefore, a balanced scorecard would stand for a whole or complete representation of performance, and being clever to reflect on an entire set of information would certainly show the way to improved decisions (Thareja P, 2008). The necessary thought following this scheme is trouble-free. Metrics are appropriate parameters that gauge meticulous aspects of performance (Thareja & Mannu; Thareja & Priyavrat, 2007). The balanced scorecard collects a broad collection of these metrics in anticipation of being capable to exactly review on the whole efficiency. Antoni Marc (2002) says these metrics are taken in placement with a managerial goal or task, which would then be aided by additional explicit associate goals. According to Leung, Edgar T.C. (2002), these goals are therefore made top down in anticipation of the fact that they symbolize specific, quantifiable objectives for exact departments and yet person to person employees. Certainly, the essential tactic in itself does not need any sophisticated utensils or applications (Beattie & Ken R, 1999). In conjecture, this scheme could be launched utilizing merely paper and pencil! On the other hand, in actuality, additional factors for example efficiency and the time it catches to carry out surveys and accumulate data must be in use for consideration. Scorecard software apparatus aspire to decrease these realistic obstacles and let management points on receiving results as a substitute of the accomplishment details (Naveh & E Marcus, 2004). This is the reason that digital forms are used for gathering data, databases are used for recording the data in, and statistical and graphical scrutiny software are used for showing the results, at the same time as not necessary, but are extremely accommodating (Chow-Chua, Clare; Goh, Mark; Wan, Tan Boon, 2003). They can assist in roughly each pace in the procedure. According to Santos, Leticia Escanciano & Carmen (2002), when making goals, visualization applications can assist elucidate and make easy all discussions. When gathering metric data, automated software can create it much more flexible. Assembling the data into a particular database and then doing review on it to obtain helpful information can be done utilizing extraordinary programs. And lastly, according to Alcorn, Janice E. (2008), the results of this examination can be shown and transmitted all through the organization utilizing scorecard tools in addition. 5. Conclusion Generally, chosen quality Models and performance management tools can act wonders for assisting managers put into practice the balanced scorecard scheme. And with this commanding performance management instrument, any organization should be capable to do better with itself in all domains (Venkateswara Rao & T. V. Rao – 2004). No manager should overlook such a potentially supportive approach, particularly in times of catastrophe when speedy, correct decisions are seriously needed (Simon Burtonshaw Gunn & Malik Salameh, 2010) Quality control modes and tools are utilized for trouble resolution in the production process, for arriving material control and innovative product design control, and in addition for examination to assist top management settled on with policy. It assists to confirm that plan is being made and helps with determination of troubles in sales, human resource, material resource planning, production planning and others (Ed Barrows & Andy Neely, 2011). Quality models and performance management tools can only be successful when managers show support and commitment; they have the reason for its implementation, they facilitate trainings when needed, every involved entity must properly be acquainted of the concepts, there should be settled method of assessment and a voluntary contribution of all entities present in its domain (Wayne W. Eckerson, 2010). References BG & Plunkett. The Development of Quality Circles, 1994. Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa. Guide to Quality Control, 1986. Susan Ramsey. Internal Quality Mechanisms, 1990. Filicetti, J. Risk Assessment Worksheet and Management Plan A comprehensive guide to risk assessment in project management. RAC Publication. TQM, The TQM Toolkit, 1993. Ozeki, Kazuo & Tetsuichi. Handbook of Quality Tools, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990. Douglas McGregor The Human Side of Enterprise McGraw-Hill 1960 Markle Garold. Catalytic Coaching. Praeger Pub Text 2000. Whitmore John Coaching for Performance. Brealey Nicholas. 2002. Lepsinger Richard, Lucia Anntoinette, The Art and Science of 360 Degree Feedback. Pfeiffer, 2009. Godfrey, A. B., Juran's Quality Handbook, 1999. ISBN 007034003. ICH1 Guidance E6: Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated guideline Pyzdek, T, "Quality Engineering Handbook", 2003, ISBN 0824746147 Juran, Joseph M. and De Feo, Joseph A., "Juran's Quality Handbook", 6th Edition, 1999, ISBN 978-0-07-162973-7 Rose, Kenneth H. Project Quality Management: Why, What and How. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: J. Ross Publishing. 2005. ISBN 1-932159-48-7. Paul H. Selden. "Sales Process Engineering: An Emerging Quality Application". Quality Progress. 1998. Allen M. Quality Management Strategy May 2010. Cianfrani, Charles A.; West, John. A Simple Guide to Implementing Quality Management to Service Organizations Cracking the Case of ISO 9001 (2nd ed.). American Society for Quality. ISBN 978-0-87389-762-4. 2010. Westcott, Russell T. Stepping Up To ISO 9004: 2000 : A Practical Guide For Creating A World-class Organization. Paton Press. 2003. ISBN 0-9713231-7-8. Thareja P. "Total Quality Organization Thru’ People, Each one is Capable". 2008. Thareja, Mannu; Thareja, Priyavrat. "The Quality Brilliance Through Brilliant People". 2007 Poksinska, Bozena; Dahlgaard, Jens Jörn; Antoni, Marc (2002). "The state of ISO 9000 certification: A study of Swedish organizations". The TQM Magazine. 2002. Tsim, Y.C.; Yeung, V.W.S.; Leung, Edgar T.C. "An adaptation to ISO 9001:2000 for certified organizations". Managerial Auditing Journal. Beattie, Ken R. "Implementing ISO 9000: A study of its benefits among Australian organizations". Total Quality Management. Naveh, E.; Marcus. "When Does the ISO 9000 Quality Assurance Standard Lead to Performance Improvement? Assimilation and Going Beyond". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2004. Chow-Chua, Clare; Goh, Mark; Wan, Tan Boon. "Does ISO 9000 certification improve business performance?" International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2003. Santos, Leticia; Escanciano, Carmen. "Benefits of the ISO 9000:1994 system: Some considerations to reinforce competitive advantage". International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2002. Alcorn, Janice E. "The Benefits of ISO 9000 Certification". A Collection of Papers Presented at the 55th Conference on Glass Problems: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 16, Issue 2. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. 2008. T. Venkateswara Rao, T. V. Rao. Performance management and appraisal systems: HR tools for global management. 2004 Hans Johnsson, Per Erik Kihlstedt. Performance-Based Reporting: New Management Tools. 2005 Simon Burtonshaw-Gunn, Malik Salameh. Essential Tools for Organizational Performance: Tools, Models. 2010. Ed Barrows, Andy Neely. Managing Performance in Turbulent Times: Analytics and Insight. 2011 Wayne W. Eckerson . Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managin. 2010. Read More