Shark finning industry Sharks, as a species, exist in oceans for about 400 million years (Verclar et al. 1078). The last decades, the population of sharks globally is continuously decreased; the expansion of the finning industry is considered as the key reason for this phenomenon…
Download file to see previous pages...
The consumption of fin of sharks is quite common in many countries worldwide. However, this ‘custom’ threatens the population of sharks internationally. In accordance with a recent research, the finning industry worldwide is a continuously growing industry, with the value of the fin to reach the $116/ kg (Verclar et al. 1078). India is among the countries with the highest performance in this industry; in accordance with Verclar et al. the annual shark production of India reaches the 45,500 tonnes (Verclar et al. 1078), a significant figure if taking into consideration the price of the particular product in the market, as presented above. It is clear that the profits of the particular industry can be significant, a fact which may be considered as a barrier to the control of the phenomenon. As noted in the study of Verclar et al., about 20 species of sharks will be extinguished by 2017 if the shark finning industry continues its current rate of expansion (Verclar et al. 1078). However, the current signs regarding the development of this industry are rather discouraging; instead of being reduced, the finning industry is further expanded with other countries to be involved in such activities. An indicative example is China, which has started to activate in many areas of the specific industry – acting as ‘producer, importer, consumer and processing centre’ (Verclar et al. ...
tivity, as it combines the trade of fin, as a product of a significant value, with the trade of other parts of the shark – meaning the body and the bones (Verclay et al. 1080). At this point, it should be noted that ‘not all fins of a shark are of the same value’ (Verclay et al. 1080). In any case, since all parts of the body of a shark can be disposed to the market, the fishing of sharks is quite popular, guaranteeing high profits. Efforts have been made for setting limits to the particular activity, since a threat of the extinction of many species of shark has been made clear. Under this threat, the Government of India prohibited the fishing of a particular species of shark, the elasmobranchii, in 2001 (Verclay et al. 1080); the Gazette Notification through which this prohibition was imposed has been proved particularly valuable for the protection of the above species. Another practice used for the control of shark finning industry worldwide is the DNA checks; through these checks, the level of limitation of each shark species can be identified – by checking various parts of the bodies of sharks disposed to market (Verclay et al. 1080). The above method has the following disadvantage: not all parts of the body of a shark can prove valid information on the species of the shark; however, new DNA checks have been improved allowing the identification of sharks’ DNA even from dried fins (Verclay et al. 1080). Particular attention should be paid to the effects of shark finning industry for the marine ecosystems. In accordance with Taylor (2010) sharks are predators, which helps to keep balance in prey worldwide (Taylor, online article). By reducing significantly the number of sharks worldwide, extremely severe damages would be expected on marine ecosystems
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Shark finning industry argumentative essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1426435-shark-finning-industry-argumentative-essay
(Shark Finning Industry Argumentative Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Shark Finning Industry Argumentative Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1426435-shark-finning-industry-argumentative-essay.
The people that agree with gay marriage also argue that by not allowing gay marriage, homosexual couples are being denied the rights that are written down for them in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This amendment makes it known that every American citizen is to be treated equally in matters that concern their rights, such as marriage, without taking into consideration their gender, race, or ethnicity.
The same has been the objective of United States Fish Stock Agreement. Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the Agreement came into effect on 4 August 1995 for the conservation and management of straddling fish stock, and highly migratory fish stocks.
Despite the fact that other people do not view the gays and lesbians as normal people, they themselves are making a progress in the issues, and thus they are working to ensure that they get what is rightfully theirs. In the past few years, the gay and lesbian movement has been able to get legal protection, making the movement to be legal, and now anyone willing to come into the movement is not at all restricted (Rimmerman 1).
The American government agreed without too much lobbying from the congress. However, the Canadian government needed to be courted just a little bit longer.
For this to take effect it required that General
According to a report released by the U.S Government Accountability Office in 2010, there are many negative, economic effects arising from piracy and counterfeiting on the U.S economy. However, based on this report, the many claims that piracy has led to the loss of many American jobs and the loss of millions of U.S dollars are not valid.