21 October 2011. Q. 1 a) Leadership and management are two different terms, although they are often used interchangeably. Owing to the similarity of the nature of job, leadership is frequently confused with management…
Download file to see previous pages...
A leader establishes the target himself while a manager is not authorized to establish the target. Rest of the work of a leader and a manager is the same. Both plan and control the work of the subordinates. A leader is also a manager but a manager is not a leader. A leader is not able to achieve his target unless he has robust management skills. A manager can be thought of as a leader in his own little capacity. He also takes decisions but his decisions are directed at organizing the subordinates in a way that is conducive for the achievement of the senior’s targets. b) I would consider it a great compliment if I am recognized by someone as a good manager or a good leader. Both are equally difficult skills. Some say that leadership is easier as compared to manager because the individual has the freedom to take independent decision. Nevertheless, this does not come without added responsibility. If a leader becomes successful, the whole team takes the credit. On the other hand, if the leader fails to achieve his target, the whole blame rests with him. Therefore, a leader assumes complete risk for the work. In comparison to the leader, the manager assumes very little risk. A manager is one of the team members in the hierarchy of the organization structure that a leader has. He is answerable to the leader for the compliance of the work quality, progress and cost as per the quality plan, project work schedule and the cost schedule he was originally provided by the leader. There can be a lot of excuses if any of these doesn’t comply with the original schedule owing to the hidden risks i.e. weather risk, political crises and financial crises etc. Nonetheless, management in itself is no less than an art. To make things go as per the schedule, a manager needs to have robust organizing skills. Yes, I can be both a manager and a leader as long as I have good risk identification and mitigation skills. c) Leadership has no relation to gender. A woman can be as good a leader as a man. Both men and women have their own strengths and weaknesses. Even within a particular gender, people greatly vary in their qualities. One woman may be a very good leader while another may not be so. Likewise, some men make very good leaders while others do not. All that matters is the extent to which an individual is foresighted, frugal and dominating, and both men and women can have these qualities in them. Q. 2 a) Emotional intelligence is an individual’s ability to monitor his/her own emotions as well as those of the subordinates or any group of people. People born with high emotional intelligence are more articulate in their manner and know how to deal others without offending them. In everyday life, we encounter a lot of situations which we don’t like being in. We have numerous options to deal with the complications, some of which help us achieve our targets without making anyone feel hurt while others lead us to our targets on the cost of our relationships with others. The behaviors we are required to exhibit in order to make things go smoothly vary from one situation to another. Sometimes, a mere smile on the face solves the problem. In other times, the smile won’t do. It has to be something else. People with high emotional intelligence know what behavior works best in a certain setting. Emotional intelligence has five dimensions namely “self-awareness, self-management, self-motivation, empathy and social skills”
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/management/1391942-leadership
(Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1391942-leadership.
Traditional conceptualizations categorized leadership styles into three distinct categories. These are: democratic, autocratic and laissez-faire. This categorization is greatly associated with Kurt Lewin and his fellow researchers (Hill & McShane, 2006). Different situations require different leadership styles.
Leadership is the ability to lead a group of people or an organization. In essence, it involves the establishment of a clear vision, with a clear vivid picture of the destination, and a grasp of success and how to attain it. Secondly, the vision should be shared with others so that they can willingly follow (Northouse, 2009).
Defining the characteristics is indeed a complex process as it associates the notion of solution to diverse problems with varying intensity. In today’s world of cut throat competitive business environment organizational leadership is a huge area of study because proper leadership can uplift the performance of an organization from grass root levels to sky rocketed acceleration.
Leadership style: Autocratic. In this case, an urgent need to lay off followers is needed to avoid further dropping of company’s revenue. It needs a leadership that overrides emotional connection between the leader and the followers to avoid degeneration of
Many of these leaders have accomplishments and they have records in history as being some of the most remarkable leaders (Lussier and Achua, 2009). For example, Malcolm X was one of last century’s most pragmatic of leaders and his deeds are thus
This is understanding and controlling one’s emotions in equal proportion to understanding the emotional state of others. La Toya Jackson was fired from the show in 2011. La Toya allowed her ego to drive her
Democratic style of leadership is the direction which law enforcement leaders ought to take. Superior law enforcement leaders necessitate taking long-term, tactical views when mounting budgets as well as policies.