Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The paper “Effects of Government Structures on Growth, Sustainability, and Development of Nations” is a cogent example of a macro & microeconomics research proposal. Government systems negatively or positively impacted the economic development of their nations. Capitalism is whereby all governmental systems and institutions are democratic in nature and all properties are self-owned by citizens…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Effects of Government Structures on Growth, Sustainability, and Development of Nations"
Name
Institution
Date of submission
Instructor
Introduction
Government systems have either negatively or positively impacted economic development of their nations. Capitalism is whereby all governmental systems and institutions are democratic in nature and all properties are self owned by citizens (Johnson 2014). The economic practices of capitalist governments have characteristics of a free enterprise and the wealth is unevenly allocated and distributed among citizens. Communism is however, a government system whereby wealth and education is given by the state to all citizens regardless of race, age, and elite standards and all property is owned and distributed by the government when it wills to do so, and that the government has a full mandate of providing health and or medical services to people (Chen 2010).
US
For a long time, the US has been among the premier nations that have always been generating a lot of revenues and one of the reasons has been that, it has a strong and well established capitalized government system. Adam Smith outlined that capitalism is the way for nations to make wealth and that capitalism only allows minimum interference from the government, a stepwise approach that gives businessmen piece of mind to become more innovative and skilled (Chantrill 2014). The US GDP is ranked among the most consistent in comparison to other nations, and this is because most of its industries are privately owned by individuals or groups of companies. The private sector has owned assets allover the US and the overall outcome has been that, it has led to health competition among its business men and entrepreneurs which at the end leads to production of quality provision of services (Chantrill 2014).
Historical GDP growth of the US (Chantrill 2014)
Year
GDP-US
$ billion nominal
Population-US
million
-
$ billion nominal
1950
293.7
151.326
0.00
1951
339.3
153.917
0.00
1952
358.3
156.552
0.00
1953
379.3
159.232
0.00
1954
380.4
161.958
0.00
1955
414.7
164.731
0.00
1956
437.4
167.551
0.00
1957
461.1
170.420
0.00
1958
467.2
173.337
0.00
1959
506.6
176.305
0.00
1960
526.4
179.323
0.00
1961
544.8
181.588
0.00
1962
585.7
183.881
0.00
1963
617.8
186.204
0.00
1964
663.6
188.555
0.00
1965
719.1
190.937
0.00
1966
787.7
193.348
0.00
1967
832.4
195.790
0.00
1968
909.8
198.263
0.00
1969
984.4
200.766
0.00
1970
1038.3
203.302
0.00
1971
1126.8
205.515
0.00
1972
1237.9
207.752
0.00
1973
1382.3
210.013
0.00
1974
1499.5
212.299
0.00
1975
1637.7
214.609
0.00
1976
1824.6
216.945
0.00
1977
2030.1
219.307
0.00
1978
2293.8
221.694
0.00
1979
2562.2
224.107
0.00
1980
2788.1
226.546
0.00
1981
3126.8
228.670
0.00
1982
3253.2
230.815
0.00
1983
3534.6
232.979
0.00
1984
3930.9
235.164
0.00
1985
4217.5
237.369
0.00
1986
4460.1
239.595
0.00
1987
4736.4
241.842
0.00
1988
5100.4
244.110
0.00
1989
5482.1
246.399
0.00
1990
5800.5
248.710
0.00
1991
5992.1
251.802
0.00
1992
6342.3
254.933
0.00
1993
6667.4
258.103
0.00
1994
7085.2
261.312
0.00
1995
7414.7
264.561
0.00
1996
7838.5
267.850
0.00
1997
8332.4
271.180
0.00
1998
8793.5
274.552
0.00
1999
9353.5
277.966
0.00
2000
9951.5
282.162
0.00
2001
10286.2
284.969
0.00
2002
10642.3
287.625
0.00
2003
11142.2
290.108
0.00
2004
11853.3
292.805
0.00
2005
12623
295.517
0.00
2006
13377.2
298.380
0.00
2007
14028.7
301.231
0.00
2008
14291.5
304.094
0.00
2009
13973.7
306.772
0.00
2010
14498.9
309.350
0.00
US Gross Domestic Product GDP History Fiscal Years 1950 to 2010
It is also significant that economic development of the US was at a stake because the government collects enormous amounts of taxes from citizens who are in business and in private sectors.
UK and China
The UK governance has been conducting their economic practices through the capitalistic governance system. Infact, it is the third most known capitalistic nation in Europe. Most elites in UK do advocate that the only way to economically advance further is by establishing a more neo-liberal capitalistic governance system to counter advanced investment from China that has taken root in Britain (Clark 2013). It has shocked many people in UK because of the steps that have been made by the vice chancellor of exchequer who together with Mayor of London who have gone to beg the Chinese government to invest in Britain. The fear from this is that China has been branded a communist nation since 1949. Their governance was centralized and managed by the state (Clark 2013). This meant that there was no freedom given to people to conduct and exercise their choices in terms of agricultural and entrepreneurial investments (Hart-Landsberg 2010). It is till the end of 1970s that Deng came into power and it was not long when he started to make reforms with intentions of expanding their economic operations both regionally and internationally. Till now, the GDP and revenue from exports of China has increased to greater magnitudes while that of the UK is decreasing significantly.
Trading Economics, 2013
GDP
Last
Previous
Highest
Lowest
Forecast
Unit
Trend
Gross Fixed
Capital Formation
241756.80
2012-06-29
215682.00
241756.80
80.70
243897.01
2012-12-31
CNY HML
Gross National Product
516282.10
2012-06-29
468562.40
516282.10
679.00
520393.33
2012-12-31
CNY HML
GDP per capita
3348.01
2012-12-31
3120.93
3348.01
85.52
3566.43
2013-12-31
USD
GDP per capita PPP
7957.62
2012-12-31
7417.89
7957.62
523.95
8490.65
2013-12-31
USD
GDP Growth Rate
1.80
2013-11-15
2.20
2.60
1.40
1.49
2014-02-28
Percent
GDP Annual Growth Rate
7.70
2013-12-31
7.80
14.20
3.80
8.08
2014-03-31
Percent
GDP
8230.00
2012-12-31
7320.00
8230.00
46.50
9272.35
2013-12-31
USD Billion
Source: Trading Economics, 2013
The Chinese governance has combined both capitalistic and communism practices because the State still has an upper hand in controlling major economic operations and still, it has allowed private investors and individuals to own their businesses and manage industrial processes (Clark 2013). It is of essence to note that this is the same system that was used by Britain between 1945 and 1979, a period that helped Britain to achieve a sustainable economic growth that inturn improved lives of individuals. Chinese governance is hybrid in nature and has been depicted to be one of the most reliable economic advancement of the decade and is the reason why it suffered less during the 2008 financial crisis (Clark 2013).
Russia and China
Comparing the Chinese governance structure and Russian governance reveals that China has managed to rocket from a socialist republic to a greater level of governance that has allowed market-based economic growth (Chen 2010). After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russian governance got confused because they did not arguably and innovatively decide on what was to be chosen as the best option. The options were either to choose communism or to make radical changes according to the definitions that were given at that time by western economists. At the end, the Russian government chose radical reforms but whose benefits were not realized because of the political constraints that were present after the soviet fall (Chen 2010).
Trading Economics
Aims
The main aim for documenting this analysis will be to evaluate effects of government structures on growth, sustainability, and development of nations with regard to the most recent development techniques. It is possible that the present state of nations is a result of long term impact of their government structures and global economic change (Ihmctan N.D).
Methods
Data will be collected through both secondary and primary data collection. Primary data will include sending survey questionnaires through interrelated communication channels like emails, personal contacts, and through teleconferencing. The survey questions will be prepared by use of surveymonkey software (Ihmctan N.D). Oral interview will also be applied to collect ideas, views, and suggestions from targeted respondents. It is expected that documentary analysis of published journal articles, reports, and books will generated empirical and relevant data that reflects aims of the analysis. Care will be taken to ensure that only valid and recommended documents are used (Ihmctan N.D).
Bibliography
Clark, N. 2013, Ruled by hardcore capitalism, UK looks longingly at China. Viewed 4 Tuesday, 2014.
Chantrill, C 2014, US gross domestic product GDP history. Viewed 3 Monday, 2014.
Chen, E 2010, The lessons of economic transition: Soviet Russia and Communist China. Viewed 3 Monday, 2014.
Hart-Landsberg, M. 2010, The U.S Economy and China: Capitalism, class, and crisis. Monthly Review, vol 61 no. 9. Viewed 4 Tuesday, 2014
Ihmctan. (N.D). Research methodology. Viewed 5th February 2014
Johnson, J 2014, The advantages of capitalism in business. Viewed 3 Monday, 2014
Trading Economics 2013, Trading Economics. Viewed 4 Tuesday, 2014.
Read
More
Share:
CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Effects of Government Structures on Growth, Sustainability, and Development of Nations
hat and other prevailing problems and notions approach to poverty elimination, and the two most important worldwide poverty agenda initiatives like the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) and the Millennium development Goals (MDGs), will be threshed out, as this researcher at the end of this paper sought to give proposed strategies and solutions to problems seen in the poverty agenda as a whole.... However, the development Programme (UNDP) was realized.... Hence, UNDP introduced such a multidimensional definition of poverty in 1990 when it came out with its first Human development Report (1990)....
… The paper "Castrol Business Strategy" is a decent example of a Business case study.... It is important for organizations to evaluate their internal and external environments so as to develop effective strategic objectives (Harris & Pritchard 2004).... An organization's strategic analysis allows for the determination of the long-run objectives and goals, implementation of practices, and efficient allocation of resources ensuring organizational success (Harris & Pritchard 2004)....
Inequality impedes the growth and development of international trade relations, hampers the growth of the economy, limits the growth of global businesses, and causes instability in the labor market (Falck, 2007).... Governments and international enterprises assert that global inequality is a threat to the economic stability of nations, both in the domestic and international spheres, thus managers and enterprises need to evaluate the issue (Gottschalk and Justino, 2006)....
This work scrutinizes the following issues: the relationship between government and business entities and how they work for society; the concept of neo-liberalization and its effects on migration control; liaison between multinational corporations and political institutions in framing the development of society; the response of the state towards societal demands, under the auspices of the constitution; meta governance and its compliance with public policy objectives.... This research evaluates the roles and responsibilities of government and business towards society....
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the research proposal on your topic
"Effects of Government Structures on Growth, Sustainability, and Development of Nations"
with a personal 20% discount.