Diverse Perspectives on the Reasons Why Western Europe Industrialised Earlier than Asia - Literature review Example

RESEARCH By Name Course Instructor Institution City/State Date Abstract The debate concerning why Western Europe industrialised earlier than Asia has over and over again been mislaid in the ‘dominion of mindset’. Notably, it has been a norm in the midst of Eurocentric’s to list the achievements of Europe in supporting technology, intrinsic to the obvious sagacity accredited to its free market financial system, property rights, culture, as well as the state’s unautocratic approach. As a result, Europe had favourable socio-political-economic organizations; attached with its moderate environment along with deficient Malthusian demands on resources, not like in Asia, which saw resources as the natural contender for them to experience Industrial Revolution. In this regard, the study seeks to outline the reasons why Western Europe experienced industrial revolution earlier than Asia, with the argument based on Eurocentric view on industrialization. Q. 1 Why Western Europe Industrialised Earlier than Asia Introduction One benefit Western Europe had over Asia was the fact that they were ethnically united, but politically diverse. Hobson (2005, p.373) posits that by being ethnically united, European countries managed to exchange ideas without restraint all through the Western Europe; for instance, the heliocentric theory was suggested by Copernicus (a pole) and endorsed by Galileo (an Italian). When Dutch lens maker managed to create a telescope, Galileo without delay embarked on making his own enhanced model. Arguably, when the globe’s industry and trade begun to revolutionize in the late 20th century into a more international economy, Zhang (2001, p.12) argues that the historians changed their views on the times of yore. This appeared to shift away from a ‘Eurocentric’ perspective of history and encircling a more universal history recommending a worldwide economy in the early days of 12th century with its heart situated resolutely in Peiping. However, the big question is why Western Europe industrialised earlier than countries like china which arguably had advanced technological and scientific knowledge in the pre-industrial period. Critical Review Opinion concerning the industrial revolution in Western Europe is diverse; but more or less it can be divided into three sets; Global economists, Eurocentric fatalists, as well as a set of revisionist historiographers who brush aside the soundness of any contrast because of the tremendous disparities flanked by Europe as well as other global regions. According to Jaimes (1992, p.9), some of the reasons why Asia failed to be the first to industrialize include; demography, knowledge, natural features and balance, European fiscal advantage, worldwide economy and colonialism, governmental guiding principle as well as the development role, and cultural disparities. The role played by natural features and balance has been utilised by revisionist historiographers to respond to the questions why Europe industrialised before Asia. Most of them argue that European countries like Britain had an enhanced climatic environment over Asian countries such as China owing to its calm weather conditions and continuous rainfall (Hobday, 2003, p.294). Favourable climate sheltered Europe against famine and disease, and resources destructive calamities. In addition, the favourable conditions for farming as well as productive soil facilitated Western Europe, to maintain extra sufficient land to utilise for animals grazing, something in no way actually accomplished in China. Yet, this reasonably Eurocentric perspective fails to take into consideration some areas in Asia such as Guangdong region with favourable climate as exhibited by Garnaut and Song (2006, p.376). Nearly all historians concur that Western Europe favourable weather conditions favoured it to develop hastily, unlike the Asian countries who lacked suitable natural resources to do farming.. According to Fitzgerald (2000, p.7) technological advancement was an additional key aspect in the expedition to make out how Western Europe came to Industrialize earlier than Asia. Basically, industrialization relied on technological development and certainly the Europeans managed to make scores of technological advances. Fitzgerald (2000, p.9) affirms that Europe’s innovation of how to generate heat as well as using it efficiently was undeniably the main Industrialization breakthrough. Eurocentric historians, affirm that the advancement concept was ‘feeble or lacking’ from Asian civilization. Rather than developing technology of past inventions, which rested on the colossus’ shoulders, Garnaut and Song (2006, p.377) posit that all inventions appeared to begin from nothing, and this offers a justification why China and other Asian counties succeeded in other historical epochs. For instance, China had offered the globe gunpowder and compass and also had created a vast coal and iron complex at the time of Song reign; yet, in what appears to be a perfect platform for Chinese to industrialize, on no account materialized. What’s more, the nonexistence of technical societies as well as the distribution of concepts is believed to have decelerated the industrialization process in Asia, even though Asian prints were well-known scores of years prior to that of Western Europe; concepts were not at all disseminated like that in the late 18th century during the Age of Reason (Jones, 2013, p.324). Besides, in Europe technological studies were supported by the government and the reliable warfare catalysts as well as competition between states facilitated the industrialization process. Western Europe environmental benefits are presumed to have brought about and stirred its industrialisation, for instance, Europe’s mines, especially those in Britain were close to their markets. Even though Asia did have huge reserves of coal, the coal mines location was far from the market making it hard for its transportation (Brien, 2013, p.164). Furthermore, pursuant to the southward general relocation in China as well as the migration of the cultural hub to ward in opposition to assail from aggressors, the coal business that had on one occasion been thriving turned out to be a backwater , based on novel ideas and trade. Besides, the climates of Asia and Western Europe as well played a crucial part in the technology development. For instance, Europe’s main setback was flooding, but a resolution was established through development of steam power-driven pump. Fundamentally, when Europe became accustomed to the new steam power-driven pump, the pump created the base for the steam power, which was utilised in the industry (Zhuang, 2013, p.36). On the other hand, Asia had the contrary setback: the setback of impulsive combustion, and although a resolution was established through sufficient aeration, the resolution lacked the similar potential for industrial development. Debates rooted in demographics play a crucial part in understanding why Asia failed to industrialise before Western Europe. Eurocentric historians articulated that Asia was more densely populated as compared to Europe who was somewhat less populated. Owing to the labour profusion, Asia is deemed to have had inferior bona fide remuneration than Western Europe and so lacked the similar desire to build up employment saving strategy. According to Thomas (2013, p.83), the argument offered by Malthusian by no means holds water since they never justified how lack of enough land as well as dense population decelerated industrialization process. However, Europe’s a huge arable land as well as its less population could have fostered industrialisation. Still, the natural catastrophes that happened in Europe such as wars, contagions, food shortages tended to polish off labour instead of farm products; thus, it is believed that this produced higher earnings as well as a more outstanding desire for automation. Eurocentric intellectuals hold the view that that Western Europe was ‘inimitably affluent’ before Industrialization. They deem that Europe possessed more resources, an enhanced agricultural production system, the specialization foundations, basic property rights, private ownership, skilled professionals, and enacted rule and regulations (Garnaut & Song, 2006, p.384). Still, some countries in Asia such as China did have property rights and private ownership from 6th century BC; therefore, such assertions on closer scrutiny are not completely exceptional to Western Europe. Notably, China owned an extremely industrious agriculture systems rooted in rice production, which according to Brien (2013, p.165) generated excess food, and permitted the Chinese to carry out their business expansively locally and globally. Zhang (2001, p.14) posits that that Asia was ahead in global economy, and so Europe were compelled to make use of their riches from their colonial outlets such as American silver as well as gold to penetrate in the economy, that was dominated by the Asians foe over three centuries. Jaimes (1992, p.19) believes that through colonial outlets managed to surpass the success of Asians in the global economy; thus, they became industrialized earlier than their Asian counterparts. Conclusion Conclusively, Eurocentric view embarks upon this question “why Western Europe industrialised earlier than Asia” from diverse perspectives. More lately, scholars have proved how Western Europe became Industrialise earlier than Asia, and many believe it is because of ‘mislaid materiality’ as well as ‘Eurocentric historians’ shortcuts. This matter has turned out to be even more clouded as scores of these features have begun to materialize in comparable ways in both Europe and Asia. In this regard, just minor disparities show up in the cloud and many believe these are not unconnected features, exclusive of the combination, and it is possible that the Industrial Revolution could not have taken place in any way. Coal resource in Europe as well as its closeness to its fiscal base is a crucial aspect that led to industrialisation. In addition, industrialisation in Europe was enhanced by the invention of steam power, which was facilitated by the surplus amount. Furthermore, the spreading out of colonisation into the America’s as well rewarded Europe with additional resources and capital to finance industrialisation. References Brien, P.K.O., 2013. Fiscal, financial and monetary foundations for the formation of nation states in the west compared to imperial states in the east c.1415-c.1839. Journal of Chinese economic and business studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp.161-68. Fitzgerald, R., 2000. Introduction: Asian business systems and economic development - trade, finance and industrialization. Asia Pacific business review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp.1-18. Garnaut, R. & Song, L., 2006. Rapid Industrialization and Market for Energy and Minerals: China in the East Asian Context. Frontiers of Economics in China, vol. 1, no. 3, pp.373-94. Hobday, M., 2003. Innovation in Asian Industrialization: A Gerschenkronian Perspective. Oxford Development Studies, 31(3), pp.293-314. Hobson, J.M., 2005. Deconstructing Rosenberg's 'Contribution to the Critique of Global Political Economy': A (Re)view from a Non-Eurocentric Bridge of the World. International Politics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp.372-80. Jaimes, M.A., 1992. Re-Visioning Native America: An Indigenist View of Primitivism and Industrialism. Social Justice, vol. 32, pp.5-34. Jones, E.L., 2013. Economics without history: objections to the rights hypothesis. Continuity and Change, vol. 28, no. 3, pp.323-46. Thomas, M., 2013. The faith and the fury: the construction of anticlerical collective identities in Spain, 1874-1931. European history quarterly, vol. 43, no. 1, pp.73-95. Zhang, X., 2001. Challenging the Eurocentric, Cold War view of China and the making of a post-Tiananmen intellectual field. East Asia : An International Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 1/2, pp.3-57. Zhuang, H., 2013. Development of the Rural Cotton Textile Industry in China since the Ming Dynasty: Under the Perspectives of Proto-industrialization. (In Japanese. With English summary.). Osaka Economic Papers, vol. 63, no. 1, pp.31-50. Read More