Free

# Econometrics - Assignment Example

Summary
Limit the sample so that it begins in 2002. Regress the three month treasury bill rate (tb3ms) on the lagged three month rate and the twice lagged 6 month rate (tb6ms(-2). Do the coefficients make much sense? (Okay, explain why they don’t.)…

## Extract of sample "Econometrics"

Question 3 Use the data set shorttbills.wf1. Limit the sample so that it begins in 2002. Regress the three month treasury bill rate (tb3ms) on the lagged three month rate and the twice lagged 6 month rate (tb6ms(-2)). Do the coefficients make much sense? (Okay, explain why they don’t.) Test, at the 1% level, for first-order serial correlation using the Breusch-Godfrey test. Now run the regression correcting for serial correlation by including AR(1) in the regression. Do the coefficients make sense now? Correct for second order serial correlation (add AR(1) and AR(2)). How about the coefficients now?
The regression output looks like
Dependent Variable: TB3MS
Method: Least Squares
Date: 09/17/12 Time: 15:24
Sample: 2002M01 2010M01
Included observations: 97
Variable
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
C
0.063194
0.040434
1.562912
0.1214
TB3MS(-1)
1.346506
0.090650
14.85396
0.0000
TB6MS(-2)
-0.357690
0.092599
-3.862769
0.0002
R-squared
0.985022
Mean dependent var
2.193814
0.984703
S.D. dependent var
1.628331
S.E. of regression
0.201392
Akaike info criterion
-0.336687
Sum squared resid
3.812524
Schwarz criterion
-0.257057
Log likelihood
19.32931
Hannan-Quinn criter.
-0.304488
F-statistic
3090.922
Durbin-Watson stat
1.666622
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000000
Do the coefficients make much sense?
From the above illustrations, the coefficients are sensible. For instance an increase in six months rate can lead to a future reduction in three months rate, any coefficient bigger than 1 at intervals of three months rate may bring about a significant discharge.
Testing at the 1% level, for first-order serial correlation using the Breusch-Godfrey test we get:
If we test for one lag, it is discarded as shown by the test below.
. Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test:
F-statistic
5.033116
Prob. F(1,93)
0.0272
Obs*R-squared
4.980075
Prob. Chi-Square(1)
0.0256
If we run the regression correcting for serial correlation by including AR (1) in the regression, the coefficients make sense and we get a dependant variable as indicated below.
TB3MS
Method: Least Squares
Date: 09/17/12 Time: 15:28
Sample: 2002M01 2010M01
Included observations: 97
Convergence achieved after 5 iterations
Variable
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
C
0.008697
0.090545
0.096051
0.9237
TB3MS(-1)
0.779682
0.169038
4.612475
0.0000
TB6MS(-2)
0.196326
0.157707
1.244879
0.2163
AR(1)
0.607484
0.134082
4.530678
0.0000
R-squared
0.986450
Mean dependent var
2.193814
0.986013
S.D. dependent var
1.628331
S.E. of regression
0.192581
Akaike info criterion
-0.416241
Sum squared resid
3.449118
Schwarz criterion
-0.310068
Log likelihood
24.18770
Hannan-Quinn criter.
-0.373310
F-statistic
2256.760
Durbin-Watson stat
1.978718
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000000
Inverted AR Roots
.61
From the above illustration the coefficients make sense however, if we Correct for second order serial correlation (add AR(1) and AR(2)), the coefficient are more sensible from the approximations. We can say that they go hand in hand with the projections or the expectations. Read More
Cite this document
• APA
• MLA
• CHICAGO
(“Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
(Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1681908-econometrics.
“Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1681908-econometrics.
Click to create a comment or rate a document

## CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Econometrics

### Econometrics

...?Econometrics Regression Model Question A The other hypothesis to be investigated by this regression was weather the level of education of women had an impact on their level of availability or participation in the work place. This was to be monitored using the coefficient educ. The availability and increase of other sources of income for the family was also considered to find out weather the same affected their level of commitment at work. This was done using the variable nwifeinc. The estimated coefficients had the signs as expected and were of statistical significance, this was demonstrated clearly buy the patterns displayed by the respective graphs of the variable coefficients. It therefore demonstrated beyond any...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...in the dependent variable are explained by changes in the independent variables. Including an insignificant variable as one of the independent variables may minimize the effects of the actual variable causing the variation in the independent variable. Like in the example above, if truly age is not a determinant of income as stated in equation 1, then including it like in equations 2 and 3 will minimize the actual effects of education on income. BIBLIOGRAPHY Greene W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall. Pearson Education International. Anderson D. R., Sweeney D. J., Williams T. A. (2005). Statistics for Business and Economics. Ninth Edition. Thomson...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

### Econometrics

...Part The key hypothesis in this paper is that “Democracies have bad rood conditions compared to autocratic rule holding all other explanatory variables constant”.. This means that governments in the world which are perceived or are build on democratic principles have poor rood networks. The authors motivates this hypothesis by first looking at the reasons why autocratic governments may be forced to have good roads probably to enable troops to move around in case of both internal and external aggressions. Further, the author argues that autocratic government’s belief that good infrastructure facilities tend to blind the electorate. On the other hand, democratically elected governments due to the aspect of resource distribution may... The key...
5 Pages(1250 words)Speech or Presentation

### Econometrics

...Question No. 8 Box and Jenkins utilized sample autocorrelation function and partial autocorrelation functions to identify order of an ARMA (autocorrelated moving average) model. If y0, y1, ... yT-1 are a sequence of values from a process, the sample autocorrelation function is Rt = ct / c0, t = 0, 1, ..., T-1 Where Ct = 1/T ∑ (yi – y-bar)(yi-t – y-bar) Is the empirical autocovariance at lag t and c0 is the sample variance. The sample partial autocorrelation pt at lag t is the correlation between the two sets of residuals obtained from regressing yi and yi-t on the set of values in between them. Box and Jenkin’s method has three steps, namely model selection, model estimation and model checking. Frequently Box and Jenkin’s... No. 8 Box and...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...ECONOMETRICS PART Question a) From table the correlation coefficient between health status and years of education is 0.33. When the correlation coefficient in absolute values is between 0.1 and 0.5, there is a weak correlation between the variables and when the values are between 0.5 and 0.9 there is a strong correlation. In this case, there is a weak positive correlation between the two variables. Since the coefficient is positive, there is a positive linear relationship between health status and years of education. When years in education increase, there is an improvement in health status of the individual. Question 1 (b) i. Number of doctor visits and gender The results of the regression are demonstrated in table 2....
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

### Econometrics

...work Finance and Accounting Econometrics Question Model2 (Model 2) read = 419.7 – 18.6 * noroom – 50.0 * noeng + 29.4 * fiction N = 11984, R2 = 0.204 (1.7) (2.6) (3.1) (0.6) Interpretation of the coefficient for noroom Because noroom is one of the continuous variables, its coefficient is represented by -18.6 which is a constant. If the value of noroom increases, the model value reduces Hypothesis test In order to test for the hypothesis, we use t test as follows t = (1.7-2.6)/(3.1/SQRT(18.6)) = The t score is less than 0.5 at the 5% significance level (Dougherty, 2008). This confirms the null hypothesis, that the parameter is -20 against the alternative hypothesis that the parameter is greater than -20. Question 2 The...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

### Econometrics

... Econometrics Question Required coefficients in the estimate table become evident through writing of the needed estimates using the fitted model, μ12 will be = (ΣkY12k)/n12 = (Σkμ)/n12 + (Σkα1)/n12 + (Σkβ2)/n12 + (Σkαβ12)/n12 + (Σkε12k)/n12 We then assume that averages of the errors in this context are zero (εijk): = μ + α1 + β2 + αβ12 Question 2 In the same way, the mean in table 1 will be: μ11 = μ + α1 + β1 + αβ11 Getting the estimates of table 1 mean, add the estimates at μ, α1, β2, and αβ12. Achieving this goes by multiplying the solution vector with a vector coefficients (e.g. Sum-product) Solution for Coefficient estimates Effect a b Estimate Standard Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept     21.6100 0.2958 72 83.21 <.0001 a 1... Econometrics...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...Lecturer’s and Number Submitted Econometrics In an influential article, ‘‘Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air," David Harrison and Daniel Rubinfeld study the impact of improvements in air quality on local citizens as reflected through differences in housing prices. A simplified version of their model, which is to be studied, is ln(MVi) = β0 + β1RMi + β2 ln(DISi) +β3NOXi + β4DCHAS;i + Ɛi , (1) where the level of observation is the census tract. Further, MVi is the median housing price (measured in \$1,000) for a given census tract in the Boston metropolitan statistical area. RM is the average number of rooms in owner occupied housing in the census tract; DIS is a weighted...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...APPLIED ECONOMETRICS Q1. Interpretation of estimated coefficients in model 3 from table Table shows the least ordinary squares (OLS) of regressions of log per capita income on protection against expropriation variable in a variety of samples. The values in the brackets are the standard errors, occurred during the research. On average, if a country has a protection against expropriation of 10 percent, then per capita income increases by 4.3%, ceteris paribus (100 ×0.43 × 0.1 = 4.3%). For 0.37, the concept is the same. However, negative values of the estimates (-0.62, -1.00 and -0.25) show a reduction and not an increment in per capita income. The protection against expropriation was measured on a scale from 0-10, where a...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...Applied Econometric paper s Affiliation Introduction This paper gives answers to certain questions regarding a study by Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001): Colonial Origins of Comparative Development. In their study, they claim that countries with quality institutions and secure property rights appear to have higher economic growth than their counterparts. From the econometric model adopted by Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001), the following questions will be answered appropriately. Question 1 The coefficient estimate (β1) measures how economic growth increases due to the increase in institutions ` quality. Therefore, economic growth will increase by 43% whenever the quality of institution increases...
11 Pages(2750 words)Speech or Presentation