Self-Development and Adversary Cheating - Assignment Example

The main goal behind this article is to understand the transition between careers and particularly assess the self-preparation, identifying the gaps and filling these gaps by developing the activities. Another source of self-preparation is the creation of a unit professional program for individual development through education and training.

Individuals can build up their resume of experience and demonstrate motivation and desire to their leaders. The human resource development and selection board can look at these resumes.

Critical skills required for an individual build-up for the cyber domain include knowledge of computer networks, enterprise networks, cyber community, cyber command operations, cyber policies, hackers’ strengths and weaknesses, exploiting the data collection from opposite sources, kinetic military operations, and new trends in emerging technologies (Conti et al., 2011).

The authors do not encourage the students to adopt cheating from adversaries. They want the students to learn creatively about the behavior of adversaries about cheating. Conti and Caroland (2011) have precisely pointed out the realm of cheating.

Cheating techniques used by students in an exam present their intellectual advancement about how to use cheating means, even if these are not allowed by exam laws and policies. This exercise of an exam enhanced the student's capabilities to analyze the environment and benefited from weaknesses found in the system.

Trust was another security principle, which is left open for exploitation of the online as well as the physical world. The student showed a diversity of skills as they used different means of cheating in the class exam. Human beings always prove themselves as the weakest link in a given security system.

Students learned how adversaries used cheating by violating the rules. In addition to this, students learn how their instructors provide them with an environment to use cheating in exams. The exercise used in this article was only for one time and not for other exams or graded events. Realism and stress were increased as they occasionally walked among the students.

Unfair and unethical norms stem from this article as students with varying skills of cheating used different techniques. Only one student has been called an innovative that remembered the initial 10 digits of the ‘pi’ and filled in the rest of the digits randomly.