Sniffing - Research Paper Example

Sniffing 21st, September According to Stevens, Doyle, and Library of Congress (2009), Eavesdropping on a telephone call, known as wiretapping, is illegal in the United States unless issued by the court order. The state does not allow wiretapping unless under parties consent. However, tape recording of telephone calls can be legal in cases where an individual is endangered with kidnapping, bribery, extortion or any other offence pertaining violence. In such instances, an individual receiving the mentioned threats can tape record without the other party consent.

In 21st century, organizations have increasingly used wiretapping to record the calling content of employees. To Orebaugh, et al (2004), Sniffing fall into the category of wiretapping as it is a form of wiretap installed to computer networks as an alternative of phone networks. The device records the content conversation without the other party consent. Many organizations use this device to fix remote sniffing programs on routers and servers, which in turn, assists in traffic flows. In my opinion, it is illegal for organizations to use sniffer to secret monitor employee activities without their approval.

Although it may be done to increase productivity, it is paramount for the other party to approve the activities carried out by the organization. My feeling about sniffer use both by insiders of organizations as well as outsiders is that, it should not occur unless a court order has been issued. It should only be carried when there is parties consent. However, when issued by the court it can be done to access employees input to the organization, and this may be helpful in enhancing productivity and company’s growth.

If I would craft a law about packet sniffing, it would ensure that it only done to the parties consent. It would include rules and regulation to follow before using it. A court order would be issued before the devices are attached to the phone or any device. In turn, this would protect employees and clients from harassment and protection against theft. ReferencesOrebaugh, A., Morris, G., Warnicke, E., Ramirez, G., & Syngress Media, Inc. (2004). Ethereal:Packet sniffing. Rockland, Mass: Syngress.

Stevens, G. M., Doyle, C., & Library of Congress. (2009). Privacy: An overview of federal statutes governing wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.