Why Did Britain Decide to Apply to Join the EEC - Term Paper Example

Why did Britain decide to apply to join the EEC? Twenty-two years after the foundation of EEC the United Kingdom eventually became a member of the EEC. The United Kingdom up to its participation at the end of the Second World War, European integration is an alliance which explains why the British period, beginning the first movement. This essay will clarify the reason for British delay in joining the EEC Pre- dominant part of the United Kingdom in the world; 1960, subsequently years of economic and political faintness, the successful efforts of the EEC to join in its configuration, in the section is separated into old context. At the meantime why Britain wanted to participate and then why France refused Britain’s application for a period of time. At the finish of the Second World War, United Kingdom’s international reputation, it was an associate of valued international organisations. It was the key ally of the United States and its international strategic role of head of the British Empire detained. British pound was one of the world’s top currencies. It had Europe’s largest economy subsequently the war, and its living standards were very extraordinary. And unemployment rate was a small and comparatively stable trade price. Since a realistic approach to transnational politics, national self- interests of countries as expressed by some authors is, in the nineteenth century, Britain’s part in international organisation as a self-governing state that reflects the legacy the British national interests, and initial development due to its position as an imperial power. It had been a sovereign state of transnational system. British politicians and civil servants were aim of United Kingdom holds a special place in the world affairs. United Kingdom had always upheld a superior place in the order of peacetime and despite a weakening in the place equalled to the United States and the Soviet Union, its government and diplomats sustained to believe that it will endure to play a role. United States of America, United Kingdom, and the let-down of international organization and to keep order in the world to draw in isolation, even in the United States afterwards the Second World War, the avoidance of withdrawal, the British foreign policy had an essential occupational. Winston Churchill’s Britain three circles to the influence, his place in the world of analysis, and others of British Empire and also united Europe since Winston Churchill, as one of the apartments has been expressed as a superior connection with United States of America. Britain’s place as a factor connecting the circles at the crossing of the centre, and that none of first importance, and relations were. Churchill, in his dialogue in Zurich in the 1946, France and Germany, the European Union named on to take the lead in the generating, but fairly to become a portion of it was open. A newspaper article Britain wrote in 1938, ‘’ we are not Europe, but does not contain interest of his linking and connected to, absorbed European Coal and Steel Community talk Commons House, the Labour Government and Conservatives are united in refusing membership of close to trade union. In a sense, United Kingdom’s only these two had finished the nationalisation of industry. Coal and Steel Community to argue a general common market, spreading the effective six countries had set up the ECSC; United Kingdom took part in the discussions, but still denied to become one of the establishing members. There were three main elements for this outcome: First, the Commonwealth and Atlantic Axis in Europe looked more essential. Second, anxiety over the performance of the United Kingdom economy and growths in Western Europe merely in the late 1950s, consideration concentrated on the alignments and trade relationships with the external rather than in terms of internal circumstances were analysed. Thirdly, the European Defence Community in 1950, unsuccessful effort to form a six – by and the upcoming of the founding of a new Community thrive doubted, nevertheless, the failure of the idea of the European Defence Community to work six conventional as the idea of moving the EEC. Britain essentials it was weak. Under the heaviness of financial crisis, it is an instance of Britain’s falling significance in the world politics East of Suez had left it a protective part. Until then, two core reasons for Britain’s empire in order to continue, material and manpower, and nuclear bomb, the main of its power ‘independent deterrent ‘was a possible source of a will. Nevertheless, other scenarios for Britain as a third power in the world subsequently 1960s could not find a distinct way. In fact, for numerous people in Britain, close to the political relations will lead to the refusal of the EEC to join in plans to endorse the idea. Einzig, Paul puts it, such as: They are totally the states of the British and the complete sovereignty resolutely faced to relinquishing any portion of a base. I want to say. With its partners in a real and long-term political integration, economic integration has fetched the achievement of the inventiveness. Indeed about being a portion of Europe British roots go deep. Mayne states: Although the roman occupation, Roan law accepted crusading never be completely collared in continental Europe, United States President Kennedy, getting started with complete support of the United States, British Prime Minister Harold Macmillian, on the 31 of July in 1961 and gave a speech to House of Commons that Britain is a participant of the sign to make the decision to implement the EU norms. The first application was submitted on the 9 of August in 1961 the three European Communities. French opposition to United Kingdom’s participation was not accepted. Elysee Palace on the 14 of January in 1963, at a press conference in Paris, Charles De Gaulle, and Britain’s Common Market said his entry; he stated the reasons of the refusal: ‘’ I like that after you create a free trade area with six other states, communities , after having previously refused to participate at this time we ate building, as well as under some pressure to prevent the application is made after the actual beginning of Common Market. He, in fact, industrial and commercial activities continue , and only slight agricultural ones, (England), the sea, and the distance from the most diverse countries often change it, its markets, its supply lines are connected with. In 1964, the Labour Party gained the election with a very small majority. The new British Prime Minister Harold Wilson’s EEC application from the very same causes the first was banned by De Gaulle in 1967. Sutcliffe points out, ‘De Gaulle, but I respect the decision of other members of the EEC, particularly in the Benelux, a reconciliation of England’ I felt could be reached. EEC ministerial conference in The Hague in 1969, approved to open the way for more memberships. Nevertheless, United Kingdom Government was not sure about the French attitude. A peak in May in 1971, Heath and Georges Pompidou, and only about a month after a decent working association, to apply this to the British struck back immediately. British Prime Minister Heath, wanted to enter as soon as possible, and then opened from the inside, to resolve the remaining difficulties. The first twenty – two years later, on 1 of January in 1973, Britain eventually became a member of the European Economic Community. Conclusion: After the Second World War, the world’s top economic and armed force in the last century, Britain, the United States by the challenge and did not take long to become the leading force in the world. United States of America, federal and united Europe: Britain, Churchill’s spheres, as labelled by the three unions by placing himself into the centre subsequently the war, it is constant the traditional globalist policy. As a dominant power in this world, about the strategies of the upcoming would be harmful for their own determinations, at the earliest in Europe did not allow a narrow group of the British. EEC, worried about the performance of the British economy, economists and states in Europe external arrangements and economic reliability of a highly fruitful commercial relations that led to the focus on the idea of free trade in Britain outside the EEC presented alterative programmes were not approved, and seven was not fulfilled with the groups of the EFTA. A grouping understanding can be built about six out of a common tariff barrier will harm United Kingdom’s economic ministers was formed. Communities England will be in the United States and the European leader in the Trojan horse of an ambitious proposal to end the European economic assimilation creativities due to this awareness, was refused twice by the French President De Gaulle. However, shortly after the resignation of De Gaulle from office, the new French President Georges Pompidou released the way for Britain to become a member of the EEC. References: Childs, David (2012) Britain Since 1945. London: Routledge (Chapter 5 and 6) Ellison, James R.V. (2000) ‘Accepting the Inevitable: Britain and European Integration’, in Kaiser, W. & Staerck, G. (eds) British Foreign Policy, 1955 - 64, pp. 171-189. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Bulmer, Simon, George, Stephen and Scott, Andrew (1992) (eds) The United Kingdom and EC Membership Evaluated. London: Pinter. Daddow, Oliver (ed.) (2003) Harold Wilson and European Integration: Britain’s Second Application to Join the EEC. London: Frank Cass. Denman, Roy (1996) Missed Chances: Britain and Europe in the Twentieth Century. London: Cassell. George, Stephen (1991) Britain and European integration since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell’s Publishing. George, Stephen (ed.) (1992) Britain and the European Community: The Politics of Semi Detachment. Oxford Clarendon Press. Does the balance of power maintain international order rather than peace? H Bull, The Contemporary Relevance of the Balance of Power in H Bull, The Anarchical Society (1977), ch 5 pp 101-24. M Mandelbaum, The Nuclear Revolution: International Politics before and after Hiroshima (1981). JX1308.M2 Read More