The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The author of the paper states that among the many issues raised by the federalist papers, one of the primary concerns continually brought up and debated was the need to balance the needs for democracy against the risk of the tyranny of the majority. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy"

The Federalist Paper No. 51 argues, “In a society under the forms of which the stronger faction can readily unite and oppress the weaker, anarchy may as truly be said to reign as in a state of nature, where the weaker individual is not secured against the violence of the stronger; and as, in the latter state, even the stronger individuals are prompted, by the uncertainty of their condition, to submit to a government which may protect the weak as well as themselves; so, in the former state”. Madison is expressing in this last paragraph the dilemma between majority and minority protection. Too much majority protection and the society is like anarchy: The strong form coalitions and rule by force, using the state as a narrowly-concealed bludgeon. But with too much protection for the weak, it is inevitable that “hereditary or self-appointed authority” take over, and a “will... independent of society itself” characterized by a social elite will dominate, which is even worse than the majority tyranny leading to the odious state of anarchy.

Madison then argues that Rhode Island, without reform in the manner prescribed by the Federalist Papers and the eventual Constitution, is an example of this risk of majority tyranny. “[I]f the State of Rhode Island was separated from the Confederacy and left to itself, the insecurity of rights under the popular form of government within such narrow limits would be displayed by such reiterated oppressions of factious majorities that some power altogether independent of the people would soon be called for by the voice of the very factions whose misrule had proved the necessity of it”. Thus, Madison is proposing that Rhode Islands governmental form be used as an example to stray away from, lest the Constitution leads to the same risk of anarchy or majority tyranny.

The “will independent of society”, of course, is the risk of going too far away from the pole of majority power, represented by Rhode Island, and towards a regime more like an authoritarian or monarchic one. The whole objective of the Federalist Papers was to craft another solution, a different way of going between the horns of the dilemma: “[B]y comprehending in the society so many separate descriptions of citizens as will render an unjust combination of a majority of the whole very improbable, if not impracticable”. Mechanisms like encouraging coalitions, practicing the balance of power, having the division of power between state, local and federal governments, and so on create an institutional means were forming a majority so powerful to tyrannize is difficult. For example, A super-majority vote to end a filibuster or override the President means that, for a policy to be passed, it has to have broad public support: A temporary majority or coalition will not suffice.

The second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence seems to simply be a statement of Enlightenment beliefs about the rights of men and the need to create new governments and dissolve malfunctioning social contracts. But it in fact sheds some light on the idea: There are similarities and differences between Jefferson's language and philosophy, and Madisons.

Jefferson was on the balance more radical than Madison and promoted greater options for the majority. The fear among the Founders, as Madison himself expressed, was that too much majority power could lead to mob rule, but if the government was too conservative, existing elites such as Madison and Jefferson themselves would end up ruling instead of the people, and this would be just as tyrannical. Jefferson erred closer to the side of majority rule to stem this problem off.

But the Declaration of Independence also makes clear that “Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes”.  Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy Assignment, n.d.)
The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy Assignment. Retrieved from
(The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy Assignment)
The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy Assignment.
“The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy

Federalist vs Anti- federalist

... Question one. The views of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists on the role of the representatives derive from the ways in which each see therole of the federal, or central, government. The Federalists believed in a strong central government and they thought that it would protect the rights of individual citizens. In contrast, the Anti-federalists did not trust a strong central government and favored more the concept of "little republics" or states, each with their laws establishing their own authority to protect citizen rights and exercise power of government. Each of these positions had good and strong reasoning, as represented by James Madison in Federalist Letter #10 and the debating response by the writer 'Brutus'. Today... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework


...a greater one. They claimed the emergence of congress as aristocratic in nature as president was supposed to be given much power by the constitution. Members of anti-federalist group doubted the effectiveness of national government in controlling a vast country like the United States. They sorted out several problems in constitution such as insufficient representation scheme and argued that constitution would put an end to self rule in the states. Moreover, they did not believe that constitution would effectively safeguard individual rights and privileges. As a matter of fact, the absence of bill of rights was the main argument against the ratification of United States constitution. The American citizens...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Federalist Papers

...?Introduction Federalist Papers are considered as the most important source of constitutional history of United s of America and outlined the basic principles based on which the foundations of US were built. Comprising of series of 85 articles, Federalist Papers were mostly published during the period of Oct 1787 & Aug 1788. The overall purpose was not only to reshape the constitution of the country but also to ensure the ratification of the US as a combined State. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton as well as John Jay are considered as the authors of these papers though at the time of their publication, the original authorship of these articles were kept...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Textual Cohesion this paper for the purpose of examining the textual cohesion embodied in them. These are "World News" and two issues of "The Sun," all dated August 27, 2008. The newspapers all tackle the potential declaration of another Cold War by the Russian President. As mentioned, the text used in these articles will be examined according to the usage and presence of textual cohesion. With the incorporation of textual cohesion in newspaper articles, it is important to consider that cohesion is an acceptable linkage of sentences through surface structure (White 2004). Textual cohesion in newspaper articles uses reference in describing or...
12 Pages(3000 words)Book Report/Review

Community Cohesion

...and education in interaction between different cultures and structures, thus consolidating community cohesion. In "Community cohesion in crisis", John Flint and David Robertson have argued how religious and ethnic differences which occupy discourses at the national level, have now gained predominance at the community level as well. (Smith, Lepine,Taylor, 2007) Race and religious issues figure prominently on any major discussion on the UK. To assuage such forces, the UK government has stressed out on the significance of community cohesion. The UK housing policy in the last few decades have sought to tackle the needs of the Black and Minority ethnic communities (BME). A...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

The Federalist Papers

...faction primarily because of the intellectual advantage that developed as a result of these publications. Federalist Paper 10 was written by James Madison and it specifically addresses the issue of the power and inherent danger of factional interests. The overriding argument between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists rested upon the fear of too much power in the hands of a centralized government. To counter these legitimate concerns, Madison's contribution to the Federalist Papers turned out to be one of the most important. Madison's argument rested upon the proposition that one of the finest achievements of the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Federalist and anti Federalist debates

...According to Montesquieu (1748), Federalism is “confederate republic. This form of government is a convention by which several petty s agree to become members of a larger one, which they intend to establish. It is a kind of assemblage of societies that constitute a new one, capable of increasing by means of further associations, till they arrive at such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of the whole body” (, Founders). It was in 1780s in colonial America when federalism developed a political movement. The American Federalist proposed the Articles of Confederation, later altered and ratified on June 21, 1788 into the Constitution of the United States of America, as...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The Anti Fedralist Papers vs The Federalist Papers

...The Anti-Federalist Papers vs. the Federalist Papers Anti-Federalist Papers The term, Anti-federalists, catches both a connection to certain political standards and additionally remaining in favor and against patterns that were showing up in late eighteenth century America. It will help in our understanding of who the Anti-federalists were to realize that in 1787, the saying "elected" had two implications. One was all inclusive, or situated on a fundamental level and alternate was specific and particular to the American circumstance. The vital contentions energetic about it were expressed in the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Federalist Papers

...Teacher Federalist Paper No.10 Federalist number 10 was written by James Madison under the pseudonym “Publius” where he proposed themechanism of checks and balances among the several factions in government. Federalist Paper number 10 was published on November 22, 1787 where it contained the argument of the need to ratify the United States Constitution. In this Federalist Paper #10, Madison talked about the weakness presented by a faction in a government but also presented the strength of the solution. The weakness was the faction inherent in every government and the strength is the republic form of government that...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Revolutionary Leadership in Russian Revolution and the Arab Spring

8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy for FREE!

Contact Us