Slave Counterpoint by Philip Morgan - Book Report/Review Example

Currently, he teaches at a university in the United Kingdom where he is the professor of black history. He has also served as a professor of American history in the Oxford University. Morgan is renowned for his hard work and contribution in the academic realm as he is expected to make the further scholarly contribution in academia. The slave counterpoint earned him a number of awards including the Jacques Barzun award that was awarded by the society of American psychology. He also won the Bancroft award in the year 1999 among other prizes (Morgan 11).

He is still pursuing his scholarly ambition as a professor and also as a renowned author. Slave Counterpoint is about black culture in the period during the eighteenth century. He talks about the plight of the slaves who were subjected to a significant amount of suffering even after the abolition of the slave trade. He wrote the book to make a significant comparison of slavery in the South Carolina region and Chesapeake despite the fact they were similar in an institutional constitution. He used a study to determine if there were differences between the slaves in the two regions that he selected.

He determined that there were substantial differences between the slaves judging by their contrasts as illustrated in his study. There were a couple of questions that he intended to answer to come up with the appropriate response regarding the differences between the slaves. He explains his choices of the regions were informed by the fact that the slave societies in the two regions were similar and significantly different at the same time. His methodology was based on the accounts of the two societies about one another’s activities (Morgan 131).

Morgan states that there were a number of forces that played a significant role in influencing the situation in the Chesapeake and low country slave associations. The forces include the settlement systems, dominant staples, and supply patterns of slave and the mentalities of the planters. The population profiles of the slave were also essential in determining the role of the forces in the lives of the slaves. This study was meant to focus on the ways of life of the slaves such that he would understand their way of life.

This involved categorizing the project into three fundamental principals in relation to their lives in the plantations. The categorized principles were associated with the relationships between the blacks and the whites who coexisted in the plantations. There are a significant amount of pros and cons that need to be considered before a systematic analysis is allowed. The author focused on issues concerning sources of variation and change while not making substantial consideration of the chronology of the events.

He provided an account of the origin of the plantation slavery that they had been subjected to all the time. This study was focused on the history of the North American slaves who were held in the plantations to perform farm tasks (Morgan 539). There was a need to provide adequate detail in the significance of the principles on the lives of the slaves. The two slave societies provided their own accounts of what their owners had subjected to while at work. It is clear and evident that they were aware of what was happening and that the white people and black people.

The author has emphasized the need to avoid situations that would stop stifle the faith their own benefits.