Nobody downloaded yet

Is the government justified in using capital punishment - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Instructor Submission Date Capital Punishment Introduction Every individual who participates in an offense or a crime passes through corridors of justice, be it an offense against the government or the community. Different governments have varying ways of punishing offenders…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Is the government justified in using capital punishment
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Is the government justified in using capital punishment"

Download file to see previous pages The work that follows aims at showing that the government is not justified in using capital punishment to execute justice to offenders, though at some time it is necessary. Capital punishment is not the best method of dispensing justice to offenders. This is because it denies individuals of their constitutional rights. Various countries show their opposition to capital punishment and instead support a life sentence. A recent example is one portrayed by a number of Americans at Santa Cruz who voted against death penalty for a bombing suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, against whom the authorities issued a death penalty (Rankin 1). The opponents, according to Russ Rankin in the Washington Times said that it is an outdated, ineffective and wasteful method of dispensing justice. In 1972, the United States suspended the use of capital punishment following a decision by the Supreme Court. This is an indication that it is not the best method of dispensing justice to offenders. Although the state re-established death penalty, its popularity and implementation is decreasing, with only a few exceptions (Rankin 4). The method, as Rankin points has not proofed to be the best method to deter crime. On the contrary, it costs taxpayers in a state more to execute death punishment than life sentence (Rankin 5). The government is not justified to issue capital punishment because many of them may go against the rights of those convicted. For example, Lindsey Bever reporting in ‘the guardian’ talks of a 62-year old man, Graham, wrongfully sentenced to death but escapes through being shipped to a prison in California. After the US criminal justice system reinstated capital punishment since 1976, many people have lost their lives. As Bever points, it is hard to know the exact number of people who died for crimes they did not commit. As Graham reveals, discrimination reins in the American criminal justice system where people with little crimes would face execution while others with brutal offenses would be spared. In most cases, those accused of capital punishment are poor and cannot afford to fight for their rights. This happens because the people cannot hire a lawyer for themselves unless there is a counsel provision for them and most of them fight for their rights without legal documents. This is why there is a lot of discrimination in handling these cases given that those unable to pay for the cost fail to get justice. It makes it hard to justify government’s issuance of capital punishment as there is no justice rendered to those convicted. Most of the governments practicing capital punishments go against the rights of the individuals as provided in the constitution. Every individual, even those convicted to an offense have a right to life and it is against the constitution for the government to issue a capital punishment against them. However, there are circumstances under which capital punishment may seem the best method to implement justice. Depending on the weight of the offense, a government or a court may choose to execute capital punishment on the offender. For example, following the Delhi gang rape several factors made the court term the rape worthy for capital punishment. First, the court argued that those who committed the offense did it in an extremely brutal and revolting manner which raised an intense and extreme annoyance to the society (Baxi 3). The court directly links this brutal nature of the violence to the quantum of annoyance on the society. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Is the government justified in using capital punishment Research Paper”, n.d.)
Is the government justified in using capital punishment Research Paper. Retrieved from
(Is the Government Justified in Using Capital Punishment Research Paper)
Is the Government Justified in Using Capital Punishment Research Paper.
“Is the Government Justified in Using Capital Punishment Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Capital Punishment
...executed without imposition of the death penalty and murders executed after the imposition of the same occur in similar rates. The opponents of death penalty therefore assert that there should no be any reason to impose capital punishment on the grounds of deterrence of prospective murders. The opponents also deem that unless there is a clear demonstration that only capital punishment is capable of deterring crime, the state should restrain from imposing it and turn to other means of punishment for instance life imprisonment. Justice necessitates that the weighty crimes obtain the harshest punishment that our ethical standards would...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Capital Punishment
...for their bright future. Motives behind Death penalty: In present generation various reasons have been cited for the adherence to death penalty by the governments of some countries. Some of the reasons cited are mentioned below. In order to provide security to general people, the violent criminals are often penalized with capital punishment. The main motive behind the issue is to make the other criminals aware of such consequences and to diminish the increase of criminal activity taking place. It was used to prohibit people from committing the gravest of crimes and to promote overall peace and harmony in the society. Through strong measures of capital...
14 Pages(3500 words)Term Paper
Capital Punishment
...source for the Church to tolerate the capital punishment meted out by any State or government for dreadful crimes. Since Church leaders are normally bound to adhere to the Sacred Scriptures and Sacred Traditions. Accordingly, the Magisterium has never expressly supported the idea of abolishing capital punishment, but neither does it specify in any way that using it is necessarily required and should only be implemented rarely because respect for all human life is a must. This means that even the most hardened criminal whom we see as lower than any animal must be given human dignity despite his or her deeds; and should be given the chance...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Capital Punishment
...Capital Punishment Introduction Capital punishment has been a controversial Since time immemorial, debate has beenranging as to the efficacy of capital punishment and how ethically right it is. Of course there are those who feel that the sentence is justified in a number of instances. Many people for example portend that when an individual has murdered another one it would be justified if he or she was to be sentenced to hang. However, there is the other group that christens the sentencing other individuals to hang as a bestial act that should not be condoned at any time. Whatever the reasons they put...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Capital Punishment punishment often involved decapitation. Even prior to this, capital punishment was widely used and examples of capital punishment can be found in the past (or present, in 58 countries) of almost every culture. Nearly every law regarding capital punishment in the past two millennia regard capital punishment as only appropriate for serious crimes, such as murder, treason or political dissent, although there are some examples where the punishment can be used for military crimes such as desertion or refusing national...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Capital Punishment
... Capital PunishmentPunishment for crimes which are deemed cruel and unusual is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This amendment is often invoked when discussing the legal merits of the death penalty. The use of the death penalty is considered by some to be the most obvious and heinous example of cruel and unusual punishment. Those opposed to capital punishment do not believe that the government should be vested with the power to put any of its citizens to death. Opponents also maintain that the practice is racially biased, overtly costly and does not achieve the intended...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Capital Punishment
.... The most frequently asked question is; if someone wants to kill another, why would he fear being killed just like others fear but they eventually get killed innocently and mostly in cold blood? (David and Andrew 2000). The system needs to change because of many negative impacts that it has on the society as a whole. Human beings are unique in the sense that all of them react towards emotions. Criminals are no exception. They too have emotions of fear, rejection as well as pain. It is not justifiable for any human being to take the life of another. Most of the religions preach against it, although some justify the use of capital punishment. The...
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
Capital Punishment
...Capital punishment broadly refers to ‘death penalty’ for the criminal as the only option for serious crime committed by him or her. The concept of punishment has evolved as a justified step making the criminal realize his act of omission and offense that is committed and also as an attempt to give justice to the person or people against whom it has been committed. The changing paradigms of the emerging new pluralistic society have necessitated the need to study the wider implications of punishment for the various types of crimes that are becoming a regular feature of the American society. Despite increasing crimes, I am against capital...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Capital Punishment
.... The secrets behind life after death or before birth are still unknown to us. Under such circumstances, it is logical to allow the creator to take back the life created by him. In other words, only the creator has the moral right to finish the life of a person and creations like humans have no role in such things. Conclusions Capital punishment should be avoided because of the importance of human life on earth. Instead of capital punishment, life terms should be provided so that the threats from the hard-core criminals could be avoided. References 10 Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment, (2010), Retrieved from...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Capital punishment the Ottawa government had charged the US government of violating the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Services in not allowing Faulder to consult the home government before his trial. The Ottawa government also accused the US court of not examining the family history records of the accused where it was stated that he suffered a terrible brain damage at a very young age. The article also throws light on the fact that capital punishment had acquired a political status in America. In other words the politicians who favored death penalties were presumed to be the tough guys fight against crimes. Again...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Is the government justified in using capital punishment for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us