We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Battle of Gallipoli and its effects to World War I - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
Summary
Battle of Gallipoli and Its Effects to World War I Date The Gallipoli Battle of 1915 was one of the most tactically momentous events that took place during the First World War. The battle involved a land campaign that was followed soon after by a failure of the naval expedition which was meant to take the Dardanelles by the use of the navy alone…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
Battle of Gallipoli and its effects to World War I
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Battle of Gallipoli and its effects to World War I

Download file to see previous pages... A breakdown of the Gallipoli Peninsula that was carried out, identified five land systems, based on aspects of geology, geomorphology, hydrogeology and vegetation were identified in studying this battle and these have prompted many questions concerning the reasons why the allies were defeated. The landings that were made in April 1915 were created at Cape Helles and Anzac Cove, and the objective of these landings was to seizure the upper ground held by the Ottoman Empire. The land system investigation that were conducted by historical scholars have come to show that these landing areas were deprived by landscape, with steep, intensely carved slopes, thin beaches and insufficient water deliveries. A afterwards landing at Suvla Bay in August 1915 consumed additional terrain benefits, with wide landing beaches and the water supply was readily available, but the strategic advantages of a lightly held terrain were not exploited (Doyle and Bennett, 1999). In general, the Gallipoli Campaign was a failure mainly because of insufficient preparation and leadership by the allied forces that were involved in it. In addition, the poor communications, the efficiency of the Turkish armies in the siting of defensive positions according to terrain and the lack of detailed information with regard to terrain and geology available to the allied troops involved in the war ensured their abysmal failure in this battle. Despite the fact that it was a tactical failure, the landing made by the allies on Gallipoli can be considered to be one of the most significant amphibious operations in the twentieth century. Enormous in extent that lasted for over ten months, this operation was ambitious in concept and was characterized by fierce fighting from the shoreline into the peninsula's steep, broken ridgelines. The Gallipoli invasion provided plenty of experience on amphibious operations and it not only influenced how this type of warfare was conducted during the First World War, but it also worked towards the shaping of the amphibious warfare doctrine and practices in the world war that followed (Lee, 2002). The most powerful naval forces during the First World War, namely the United States, Imperial Japan, and Great Britain, all came to use the lessons learned from this battle to produce the primary concepts for their future amphibious maneuvers. This operation came to exhibit the magnitude of the strategic prospective of a naval-ground assaulting force. The idea for this operation was conceived by the British admiralty and it became one of the cornerstones for the Dardanelles campaign. It was an effort by the allies to capture Istanbul, in order to force Turkey out of the Triple Alliance, so that a route could be opened to send reinforcements to czarist Russia (Millett, 2000). After this battle, the failures that resulted from it came to be considered to be a black mark on the records of both the future British prime minister, Winston Churchill, and the British armed organization. This resulted in accusations of imperial mismanagement, incompetent leadership, and political maneuvering that have come to cloud the historiography on this subject since the end of the First World War. Because of the huge controversy surrounding this battle, a number of myths have come to be developed concerning it, and there were assertions that it ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Balance-of-Power theory in World War I & II
Balance-of-Power theory in World War I & II. The First and Second World Wars were both the result of the accumulation of conflict that began in the 19th century. Nationalism, alliance systems, and acts of Ferguson all contributed to the start of these global conflicts.
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper
COMPARISON BETWEEN WORLD WAR 1(WW I) AND WORLD WAR 2(WW II) reasons
World War I began on June 28, 1914 after the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist. The recent acquisition of Bosnia and Herzegovina by the Austro-Hungarian Empire angered the Slavic people, who wanted to be part of Serbia, and fueled the killing.
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
Mexican Americans in World war I and World war II
Mexican Americans have been serving US for many years. Historically, they were not only the part of glowing days but also shared the hard time of US in World War I and World War II. This community won several Medals for their services and left behind the foot prints on the sand of time.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
Peak Points in World War I and II
Finally, for a more personal portion, insight is given on the life of U.S. General George Patton, a controversial figure in World War II. Causes of the War History points to “militant nationalism, reckless imperialism, swashbuckling militarism” as the main causes of World War I (Boak, Slosson and Anderson 472).
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper
Causes of World War I

The author states that industrialization also increased the ability of nations to generate revenue in order to purchase armaments, train soldiers and build railways. Therefore, industrialization further  augmented  the  menace  of  imperialism, resulting  in  a  vicious  cycle  that  erupted  in  the  form  of  the  war.

4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Benefits versus Negative Effects of World War II
Despite this, there are individuals who feel that the World War II was a good war. According to McIntosh, it was a great influence to all aspects of life in America (par. 1). In particular, the war brought the economy in America back to life. A number of contradictions thus arise from the actions taken by leaders during the activities of World War II.
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
World War I
There was absolute chaos within the world and a jungle rule kicked off immediately. A new era had dawned upon these people which eventually
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
The causes of world war I
Some of the factors that played a significant role to the war include: alliances, imperialism, militarism and nationalism. Some of the decisions made by the Serbian nationalist political organizations also contributed to war:
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
World War I
killing each other since the Dawn of time; however, the invention and use of gas as a weapon, the level and extent to which artillery bombardment was utilized, and battles involving hundreds of thousands of soldiers on hundreds of miles the front were not uncommon. The horrors
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
Information Paper on World War I
Misunderstandings lead to hostilities and result in provoking actions. The important cause of World War I is the evil tidings in the mind of the human being and aggrandizement for wealth and
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Battle of Gallipoli and its effects to World War I for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us