We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Comparative on Rousseau's Social Contract and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
Name: Course: Date: Rousseau's Social Contract and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty Jean–Jacques Rousseau and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers who have concentrated much on the subjected of freedom and liberty, with both of them evaluating their meanings and the possible limitations to these two concepts…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
Comparative Essay on Rousseaus Social Contract and John Stuart Mills On Liberty
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Comparative on Rousseau's Social Contract and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

Download file to see previous pages... The two philosophers have also delved into the relationship that exists between the government and liberty, while also investigating the valid basis for limiting liberty. Mill’s position on the concept of liberty is based on the observation that the majority in the society has the opportunity to dominate the minority, and thus subject them under their own authority (Mill, 12). As a result of this observation, Mills advocates for individuality, where individuals possess their own rights that are not interfered by the society, and thus can be able to shape their own destiny without depending on the influence of the society, which is highly driven by the tyranny of the majority. On his part, Jean–Jacques Rousseau observes that man was born in freedom, to be absolutely free, but he is always in chain whenever he is (Rousseau,). In an attempt to devise the right ways of developing a political community, he devised the fundamental concept of the liberty of people. Pitched on the argument that only the people can develop the rules that should govern them, and anything short of that is unacceptable. Therefore, this discussion seeks to compare Rousseau's Social Contract and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty, with a view to assessing their points of congruence and departure, in regards to the concept of liberty and the freedom of man. ...
Therefore, it is the institutions like that of private ownership of property that has made man bad (r). This is because, with the introduction of such institutions, man has been corrupted and made mean, so that he attempts to own as much as he can, without any due regard for the others. If there were no private ownership of property, man could not be such corrupt or mean, because he could only use what is enough for him, and leave the rest for others, thus creating equality for all. Therefore, the existence of institutions has destroyed man’s pity and benevolence. Thus the fundamental basis for Rousseau’s belief in liberty is equality and security, where man can obey himself, while still uniting himself with all, and retaining the ever unlimited freedom (Rousseau, 33). According to him, only institutions create inequality and insecurity. Mills on the other hand observes the fundamental basis for liberty as individuality and individual basic rights, which he observes are the basis for the good citizenship, which translates to a healthy society, and consequently to the freedom of mankind (Mill, 24). He observes that individuals should have the freedom from constraint by the government, but that is associated with self rule. Therefore, Mills differs with Rousseau regarding the fundamental basis of freedom, by arguing that individual rights grant man freedom, and by extension makes the society free. On his part, Rousseau argues that individual rights make an individual a slave of oneself, by making him obey his self desire (Rousseau, 56). According to Rousseau, liberty is beneficial in the sense that it enhances equality and security. This is because, when man has ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Liberty: the conflicting views of John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx
In both instances the individual cannot be practically existent outside of the community, nor can civil society itself exist without being composed of a network of individuals. Both Marx and Mill share this fundamental acceptance, however each chooses to focus on a different aspect of the relationship for emphasis.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
John Stuart Mill
The constraint may be physiological, moral, social , religious and in all the cases it limits the human being. John Stuart Mill discussed this problem, of liberty-constraint in his essay: "On liberty". But the interest for this concept has appeared since childhood.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
John Stuart Mill's principle of liberty
we may conditionally divide into two parts. Its first part declares that one has the right to do whatever he or she wants and be free from the interference from other people, and the second part states that the only allowable justification for an interference into ones actions is the prevention of harm from being inflicted on others.3 Even today, this two-sided principle of liberty seems to belong to the set of basic values our society would wish to be governed by4, and therefore this principle may be expected to be the basis for public policy, insofar as we perceive public policy as intentions and actions of a government authorised by citizens to govern the society.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
John Stuart Mill's On Liberty as applied to an issue of modern times
Prerequisite to Mill's notion of Liberty was the principle of individual intellectual and physical development; more particularly, as stated so succinctly by Mill, "Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign" (1859: np). To be sure, Mill was most concerned by what he characterized as the threat of tyranny posed by the majority.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
John Stuart Mill and Liberty. How morality is related to liberty
John Stuart Mill is considered among one of the fathers of liberalism, who proposed the concept of an expansive liberty with minimal restraint. His work 'On Liberty' is a complete set of principles that addresses the ideal nature and extent of liberty to be exercised by society over an individual.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Is John Stuart Mill's ulitilarianism a sound basis for his liberal feminism
This principle is one that views actions as right and moral to the extent that they promote pleasure and exclude pain. It sees rightness and wrongness as existing on a continuum, upon which neither
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Does ultilitarianism clash with John Stuart Mill's theory of liberty
He is contemptuous about the majority rule, but at the same time holds the masses in esteem. He measures the majority rule in the same yardstick of the despotic rule and asserts that both lead to tyranny. The sum and substance of his conclusions are, he
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Comparing both Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill's philosophical positions
Immanuel Kant, a famous historical philosopher in the 18th and 19th century, proposed the ‘Categorical Imperative or Practical Imperative’ (Maj, 2002). In his ethical theory that takes on a deontological approach, Kant placed an emphasis on the “Good Will” of
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Comparative Essay on Rousseau's Social Contract and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty
Jean–Jacques Rousseau and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers who have concentrated much on the subjected of freedom and liberty, with both of them evaluating their meanings and the possible limitations to these two concepts. This essay compares two articles on the topic of freedom, liberty and other controversial issues of the government.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
John Stuart Mills Utilitarianism
Individuals who employ higher faculties often get less contented even though their pleasure is of higher character than of an animal. This paper is a discussion of the mills statement that “it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Comparative Essay on Rousseau's Social Contract and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us