Wood, in this book, sheds light on the six revolutionary leaders in the course of American history, whose contributionschanged the landscape of the modern world to such an extent that they may be called the founding leaders …
Download file to see previous pages...
Wood. Wood, in this book, sheds light on the six revolutionary leaders in the course of American history, whose contributions greatly changed the landscape of the modern world to such an extent that they may be called the founding leaders of the modern day American political system. Wood brings the life of these men into focus and retells a story from their perspective. In the opening paragraphs of the book, Wood comments that life in modern America hampers the development of true visionary leaders such as the ones he discusses subsequently in his book. The most interesting aspect and a contradiction in Wood’s book develop right from the beginning when Wood remarks on the absence of revolutionary men in today’s world. He wonders as to why the world does not have leaders such as Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson when the political system has gone to such a level. While Wood passes this statement at the beginning, he goes on to construct his book based on how history and men within this history progressed from wilderness to a modern way of living and how, with a change in the functioning of the society, it progressed. When it is progression that Wood is discussing in his book, it is a contradiction that Wood believes that there is a need for leaders of the past in today’s world when today’s world is a much better world in the view of Wood. It may also be possible that when Wood wrote the book, his question may have been to doubt the world about the lack of men such as America’s founding fathers in today’s political system. Wood may have asked the question in all honesty and by writing the book, he may have inspired politicians of today. This book serves as an excellent point of example for today’s politicians and tells them frankly what they lack. Thus, Revolutionary Characters does not only provide information to history lovers but also serves as inspiration for today’s political leaders. It tells the aspiring leaders what made America a superpower today, and if they wish to continue ruling as a superpower, they need to take example from the founding fathers and their characters. That being said, Revolutionary Characters by Wood was an interesting book to read. This is because of the manner Wood presents his view in the book. He explores a characteristic of the founding leaders, which is often ignored. In most history books that we usually come across, leaders are shown as people with a great mass following. What prompted his following is often left remarked upon. Writers assume that the readers know what makes leaders so great. Wood, however, explored the basic premise when he said that character is the one main driving force behind these leaders. Wood has, thus, brings a personal touch to the book when he explores characters rather than history. Even though many books have been written on these founding leaders and some have even explored the personal motivation factors behind these leaders, Wood does it with reverence. When he discusses leaders such as George Washington, he lets his own opinion run free. He remarks that Washington was perhaps the greatest president. Since Wood does not back up with statement with ample proof about the greatness of Washington, it becomes clear that when calling Washington the greatest president, Wood is merely giving his own view of the leader. Also, when Wood excludes Thomas Paine and Aaron Burr from his list of great founding fathers, this again points to how Wood presents his own biased version of the founding fathers of American history. Additionally, Wood’s reverence to leaders is limited to their political greatness. It does not extend into their personal lives. This is evident in the way Wood presents the information of the illicit affair of Hamilton but does not let this
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In the Pacific campaigns that followed, Mitsuo Fuchida became the air operations officer. In this book, the author’s thesis revolves around narration of the biography of Mitsuo Fuchida. The biography makes account of the dazzling events of wartime in which Mitsuo Fuchida played a heroic role.
The book gives the true picture of Southerners’ experience with the revolution. The civil war in America had separated the North and the South. The Northerners were led by Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party and made many obstructions to the state rights of the Southern Provinces.
He proceeded sternly to state that “parallels do indeed exist between Adam and Adapa, but they are seriously blunted by the entirely different contexts in which they occur” (1981, p.92). The article is mainly geared towards disproving claims to the verity of a great parallelism in the characters.
Indeed, one of the characters, Holden Caulfield, has become perhaps the most infamous character in all of literature. Many real people, often of a disturbed nature, have found a home within Holden's search for an identity.1
Holden Caulfield does not appear to be a very sympathetic character on first glance.
Tan's decision to have several mothers and daughters telling their different stories reflects her awareness of ethnicity as a constantly shifting social construct and her commitment to community. In four chapters, The Red Candle, The Rules of the Game; Four Directions and Double Face Amy Tan portrays that Waverly are apt to accept modern values and beliefs followed by the American society.
The author states that in King Lear, he has created some of the most Machiavellian characters in his gallery of masterpieces: Goneril, Regan, the utterly villainous Edmund. All of them are monsters in their own right, but what is remarkable is that they all start out as normal people with whom the audience could have some degree of sympathy.
Considering that many of these characters contrast vastly in the first place, it is only reasonable to assume that each of these characters have a different reason to be drawn to Toru.The first two people to consider are Naoko and Kizuki. Naoko was Kizuki' girlfriend in high school, and Kizuki was Toru best friend.
It brings out the 'truth" inside of us.
The same questions have been tried to address by Richard Yates in his novel entitled Revolutionary road. The novel, written in 1961, illustrates the gradual weakening of a marriage which led to its final breakdown.
Schiff suggests that this is "an unconstitutional redistribution of wealth" (par. 3). He suggests that this is not the way to pay for healthcare because it is making one group pay for what another groups needs. However, in Obamas words this
not only to include the traditional Marxist segregation of class but extended to other spheres of life such as image, language, experience, working environment and taste as conveyed by Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares. Celebrity chef shows has become not only as a manner to teach
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Revolutionary Characters by Gordon S Wood for FREE!