Unprecedented: the 2000 Presidential Election - Movie Review Example

Bush being declared the winner. The movie-producers critically examine what went wrong before, during, and after the disputed election decision. It explores the topic of voter rolls, ballot design, vote recounting, and the actions of the judicial system in the United States particularly that of the Supreme Court. The movie is based on the hotly contested 2000 presidential election in Florida. The movie brings out a disturbing picture of an election marred by suspicious irregularities, electoral injustices, and sinister voter purges in a state governed by the winning candidate's brother. George W. Bush stole the presidency of the United States and got away with it.

It basically highlights those on the front lines from the African-Americans who were not allowed to vote for various reasons. The movie examines the fierce fight for the Presidency in Florida and the undermining of the democratic system in the United States of America. The film explores a series of events that had a huge effect on the outcome of the 2000 presidential election. It argues that the election process was marred with massive irregularities in policy and the whole election process (Martel 20).

The movie critically analyses the substandard 2000 elections and criticizes the manner in which the whole election process was carried out. It clearly documents that the election was not carried out in a democratic manner. . lm for example cites Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris for their various acts of malfeasance to prove that the election process particularly in the state of Florida was flawed. According to the film, Secretary of the State of Florida Katherine Harris and her acquaintances employed all possible mechanisms at their disposal to make sure that all individuals not legally entitled to vote could not do so.

The film claims that supporters of President Bush used a wide ranging data collection system to prevent ineligible voters from taking part in the election process. The film clearly indicates how certain people such as former convicted criminals were denied their democratic rights of choosing their leaders. The film evidently argues that people who shared or had any kind of relationship or shared names with convicted criminals were forbidden from casting their votes. The film further argues that minor issues such as ensuring the right names were in the voter register to prevent inconveniences were intentionally not dealt with.

Florida engaged database service providers to get rid of voters from the voting rolls when their names appeared to be those of ex-convicts despite warnings that the innocent were being purged along with the guilty. Sometimes the records were clearly a reflection of intentional errors in which one name was assigned a sentence date seven years in the future; the date was assumed to be in error but not the name. The cases of mistaken identity were not discovered until citizens reached the polls, when it was too late to prove their identity and rectify the errors.

The film therefore questions the integrity of the electoral board of United States. The film tries to prove that there were links between Governor Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris, and the Republican