Nobody downloaded yet

Search and seizure - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Search and Seizure: an argumentative essay The Bill of Rights was made to protect the national rights of liberty and power. It is to ensure equality and that no person’s right is violated by another act or commission. The world has evolved intellectually in so many ways and thus everything that man does is enforced with knowledge and even more knowledge to defend it…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.3% of users find it useful
Search and seizure
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Search and seizure"

Download file to see previous pages Thus being free has its boundaries, boundaries that end when it crosses upon the right of another. The law makes it sure that everything in the social arena is kept into place and no person is below or above the system. Hundreds of laws, act, proclamation and amendments were made and approved by man in ill parts of the world so that every citizen must have something to abide by and keep them from the boundaries of crossing over the border of their freedom. With all these laws made and passed; reviews, controversies and intellectual battles took over and continuously takes over to assess and reassess the efficacy, efficiency and necessity of such law. One of the most controversial and argumentative laws ever made is the law of search and seizure. This paper is to state clearly an argument on whether search and seizure and racial profiling should be banned more than accepted in the United States. This paper will discuss briefly and will point out arguments based in the author’s full understanding of the provision of this law. Over the past years the conflicts on power and authority has been a controversy especially with incidences of abuses with the use of authority, most common example are the policemen and other law enforcing authority, in implementing order in the land. Incidences like police brutality, unauthorized search and arrest, illegal collection of evidences and planted evidences to frame up some innocent are just some of the negative feedbacks the society has over the authorities. These feedbacks can also be deemed as the reasons why an argument is posed over the law on search and seizure implementation over United States of America. On whether it is efficient, beneficial and lawful to implement just the way it was planned for or is it unnecessary, unjust and should be stopped and banned. Although it has been made to check on these irregularities on authority misconduct still some flaws have questioned its validity as a law that some people are asking to nullify it. Before going to the issues of why or why not the law on search and seizure should be banned in America, it is proper to discuss on some key notes of the said law. Moreover, search is defined in the provision of the fourth amendment as, looking for evidence or a person involved in a crime by a law enforcement officer in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy while seizure is defined as taking possession of a person or object by a law enforcement officer or agent (Department of Public Safety Law enforcement Academy 2012). Search and seizure is a controversial term of legality. Going through its definition, it implies lawful examination of a person’s property and things by a law enforcement officer although it does not imply specific circumstances but rather connotes that every law enforcer has the authority to go over a person’s things without any chance of refusal because it is what the law states. And provided that something that can be regarded as evidence is seen, the authority as well has the right to seize it for legal prosecution (Department of Public Safety Law enforcement Academy 2012). The conceptual framework of search and seizure is based on good will that is to allow lawful hunt of law breakers by seeking evidences that can be available to prove that these people ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Search and seizure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Search and seizure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1401804-search-and-seizure
(Search and Seizure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
Search and Seizure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1401804-search-and-seizure.
“Search and Seizure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1401804-search-and-seizure.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Search and seizures
In addition, no warrant can be issued apart from when there is a credible cause reinforced by a pledge or declaration that must describe the residence or the person to be searched or the things to be seized. The provisions of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure
The difficulty comes in the technical wording of the laws, such as when a perpetrator voluntarily agrees to be searched, or when a suspect flees from police and refuses to stop despite their request. When, exactly, is a suspect considered seized, and how will this make the difference in the evidence admitted to the court?
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Explain the 2 clauses and 3 Key elements Contained in the fourth Amendment that specifically pertains to search and seizure. be
The point of the Fourth Amendment as provided in the case of Johnson vs. United States (1948) is not to deny law enforcement the support of usual inferences “which reasonable men draw from evidence”. Its protection is so that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by officers engaged in “competitive enterprise of ferreting out crimes”.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Private Search and Seizure and the Fourth Amendment
According to the paper, Private Search and Seizure and the Fourth Amendment, in State v. Buswell, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the protection of the Fourth Amendment was limited to government action and thus any private searches conducted by private citizens were not covered by the exclusionary rule. 
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Search and Seizure
Apparently, William who is entitled to this right did not consent to such search of evidence. This being so, such evidence is inadmissible since it is considered obtained in patent violation of William’s right. More so, the case did
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Research Paper
While not intending to imply that prior to the passage of the Charter in 1982 Canadian law enforcement and criminal justice were dismissive of the civic rights of their citizenry, Roach (2000)
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Law of Search and Seizure
Certain countries, such as the United States and Canada, have provisions in their constitutions that provide the public with the right against "unreasonable" search and seizure" (Search and Seizure, 2007). Detaining on the other hand keeping a prison in custody or to confine him temporarily.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Legal Stanpoint
Obviously in the given scenario, before soliciting a warrant for search and seizure of the contraband mentioned by the informer, it is a must to ascertain the credibility and veracity of the information delivered by him. Once this is
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Student Search and Seizures
There are significant differences between search and seizure policies and law constructs associated with adults suspected of criminal behavior and those pertaining to the juvenile youth. Ethical behavior from school officials is significantly different than that of legal practices pertaining to school administration, however both must be respected in order to secure the rights of students and also promote a quality educational environment.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Search and Seizure
The persons upon whom search and seizure are committed are selected on grounds of reasonable suspicion. In most cases, the search operation does not lead to seizure of goods/property belonging to the suspected person. At the time of the writing of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers reasoned that “search and seizure is a necessary exercise in the ongoing pursuit of criminals.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Search and seizure for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us