The Ethical Dilemma of D-generation - Coursework Example

The Ethical Dilemma of D-generation Ethics refers to the basic fundamental and concepts principles of appropriate human behavior. It comprises study of general values like the essential parity of all women and men, natural or human rights, conformity land’s law, concern for safety and health and the physical environment. Ethics denotes to well-founded canons of wrong and right that propose what humans should do, typically in terms of obligations, rights, and benefits to community, impartiality, or specific morals. Ethics, for instance, denotes to those canons that enforce the rational obligations to desist from rape, murder, stealing, assault, fraud and slander. Ethical values also comprise those, which enjoin morals of honesty, loyalty and compassion. In addition, ethical standards comprise standards linking to privileges, for instance, the right to existence, the right to liberty from injury, as well as the right to discretion. Such values are adequate canons of ethics since they are reinforced by coherent and logical reasons. Ethical dilemmas are very widespread in current’s healthcare and it often encompasses beyond the frontiers of age, gender, race and culture. Dilemma cannot be solved easily and it is more apparent when no standard alternatives are obtained. Mostly dilemma produces extremely painful and distressful circumstances to the persons who are concerned. Issues, which we witness in our society or we encounter in our every day occupation, are often augmented in the international community (Burkhardt & Nathamiel 6). The editorial “The dilemma of D-generation” from the Courier-Mail designates the moral dilemma of concerns of identity for the maturing kids born from unspecified donors. Albeit these kids have fantastic affiliation with their families, the issue of identity, history and heritage remains a misfortune. Nonetheless, nurses ought to identify the ethical concerns and identify the resolution, which arise out of these ethical predicaments. This paper will examine the ethical dilemma of D-generation using the Kobl’s model of experiential learning. Concrete Experience: Event and Moral Implications The predicament of D-generation in the Courier-Mail illustrates diverse identity concerns of children born from anonymous fathers. The technique of IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) became a good thing for numerous families with reduced or no procreative strength. The inscrutability of forming a new being within a woman’s womb has become very apparent in the international community, while the donation production of sperms has become more of a business nowadays. The potential of IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) has its criticizers because of physical and mental strains, and social pressure, however, the longing of the couple for parenthood precedes all the strains. For most new parents, embracing a newborn for the first instance shows a new light, a new generation, a genetic pointer passed down to the ensuing generation, however, to others it becomes a lifelong issue of heritage, identity, values, culture and the subject. The ethical repercussions of privacy and confidentiality of the parents is extremely crucial here while simultaneously, the right of autonomy and identity of the child remain as a quandary in these susceptible situations. Conversely, the decision-making framework for ethical quandary is very useful in analyzing the ethical dilemma from a cognitive, objective perspective, instead of a purely emotional or affective perspective (Hansen par 1). Reflective Observation: Value & Theories and Ethical Position Although IVF (In vitro fertilization) is an opportunity for infertile couples to have children, the issue of who is the birth father of the baby will always be a dilemma. The persons involved in the quandary are the parents, the healthcare specialist, sperm donor and the child. Growing up without knowing whom your father is distressing, and the agony in addition to the constant desire to seek and identify your real identity is very depressing. Most people have disclosed that they have had fantastic affiliations with their parents, with loving homes yet some things were missing, things that the parents and the loving homes could not provide – identity, history and heritage. My ethical and value position within this situation is to adhere to the ethical ethics of veracity and autonomy of the kid, which entails having the liberty to formulate choices concerning issues that influence one’s individual life in addition to the responsibility to speak the truth. The concept allied to this matter is the deontology that is based on the rationalist outlook that wrongness or rightness of a deed depends on the kind of the deed instead of its consequences. Therefore, I feel that every child ought to have the privilege to know the truth concerning their birth father once they grow up (Burkhardt & Nathamiel 37). Abstract Conceptualization: Alternatives & Possible Consequences First, the parents have the duty of conveying the verity to the youngster concerning their birth father when she or he becomes a grown-up. Secondly, the youngster can lawfully enquire concerning their anonymous birth father at any moment in their life. Thirdly, it is the privilege of sovereignty of the kid to be aware of their birth father and it ought to be well revered, as knowing their birth father is a necessity for this category of children. In highlighting the alternatives, the parents should go for the leading option since; although it is a tough circumstance, the parents have a duty to convey the verity when he or she becomes a grown-up. The possible outcomes of this deed would be, may be the parental bond could be more strengthened, out of the affection and love they have had in those years, similarly, there is a likelihood that the she or he can develop severe dejection by realizing the truth. In the second option, the possible outcome would be, by allowing them to investigate their birth father; the children could come across compromising information concerning their father. Lastly, in the third primacy of respecting the sovereignty the possible outcomes are, by telling them the verity they may be emotionally troubled by the real birth origin. Some other children may not want to know the verity and this type of information can become a load in their life that can disturb the mental and physical well-being of the child who is donor-conceived (Burkhardt & Nathamiel 38). Active Experimentation: Action Plan The quandary of D-generation is a vulnerable circumstance and it ought to be tackled very carefully. Grounded on the options as a parent I would ensure I am primed mentally and physically well before I disclose the verity to a donor- procreated child, in addition to tolerating the dread of transferring my parentage to a kid’s birth father that is very distressing a feeling. Mostly the donor-procreated children are conscious that they are from donor generation, besides most of them have already begun their pursuits. In both circumstances the donor-procreated people, parents and donors should assemble at the donor archive to provide and search for the accurate data and to ascertain the birth father. Hence, this will lessen the tremendous expanse of curiosity as well as the requisite to bond with one’s hereditary and ancestral backdrop. The donor-procreated child ought to be granted the sovereignty and choice of staying in contact with the birth father. Counseling ought to be done amid the parents and the child to ensure they are being attuned to the unfamiliar situation (Burkhardt & Nathamiel 39) Conclusively, life is the utmost supreme gift of matrimony and the living evidence of the conjoint sharing between couples. The ability of an infertile couple to be able to create life is a miraculous act. The improvement of IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) has unlocked a new capacity to infertility; moreover, the quandary of D-generation linked to In Vitro Fertilization has developed into a global concern of healthcare. Most donor- procreated children do not know their birth father and it is wrong to deny them the right to know where they originated. Everyone has the freedom to know his or her identity, heritage and culture. Therefore, dealing with the ethical dilemma involved should be tackled very cautiously without disregarding the autonomy and identity of the donor-procreated children (Hansen 7). The donor-procreated child has a right to know their birth father when they grow up and the parents should ensure that they tell them the truth. Telling the truth is the moral thing to do since situations like this ensue in the community and having the appropriate values can aid in making this kinds of decisions easy to resolve. Nevertheless, it could be hard to differentiate the wrong and right when encountered with such dilemmas, ethical thinking and the practice of value clarification could provide a guide towards moral decision-making. This is why it is advisable for persons involved to ensure that they undergo counseling so that they can tackle the situation effectively and in an ethical manner. Parents for instance could lose their child to the birth father if a child decides to live with his or her father. Such a transitioning can be depressing to the parents, hence, should be primed to cope with such a situation. Lastly, there is a need for sperm donors, children and the parents to provide the appropriate data to ease the search easier for the donor-conceived children (Hansen par 9) . Bibliography Burkhardt, M., & Nathamiel, A.  Ethics Issues in Contemporary Nursing. 2008, Print. Hansen, Jane. The Dilemma Of The D-Generation. Courier. 28 November 2010. Web. 12 December 2012. Read More