Download file to see previous pages...
Disadvantages of EMR a. No singular software package in industry b. Data security and integrity c. Date and time stamp liabilities d. Lack of industry-accepted social framework e. Lack of cooperation opportunity IV. Conclusion Works Cited Introduction There are multiple advantages in the health care organization for implementing an electronic medical records system, designed to replace paper documentation pertaining to patient care, patient history, and clinical practice related to the organization. The electronic medical records system (EMR) consists of various or stand-alone software packages in which vital clinical information and patient data are input into a computerized system. EMR allows the health care organization to input exacting patient interventions, insurance information, keep track of referrals, and a host of other documentation that has traditionally been maintained in paper format. It is designed to facilitate more timely patient responses during patient/physician interventions and improve the total efficiency of the organization and those support staff members involved in the health care service cycle. ...
Growth in insurance documentation, depth of clinical analyses, and other important supplementary documentation require a significant storage space within the organization. For instance, in a typical patient/physician intervention lasting seven to ten minutes, physicians spend twenty-five percent of this time searching through paper documentation (NASBHC 1). In an organization without an EMR system, retrieval times for accessing paper charts can be extensive especially for organizations requiring 300 square feet of storage for these documents. Common problems with maintaining traditional paper systems are lost charts and poorly coordinated billing information. By installing EMR, the prevalence of lost charts can be reduced from an average of eleven percent to under one percent by facilitating more effective document retrieval (NASBHC 2). Removing large-scale storage needs allows the organization to allocate rooms to better and more efficiently serve patients rather than having a complicated paper storage system within the business. Physicians that are forced to spend twenty-five percent of their time searching for paper documentation rather than intervening with patients diminishes productivity and can also lead to patients defecting to another health care provider due to high wait times to meet with health care staff. Simon Fraser University supports this, offering that productivity is known to increase and frequency of lost patient data is reduced with adoption of EMR (SFU 2). In terms of storage and data retrieval times, the benefits appear obvious toward implementation of the EMR system. The electronic medical records system also maintains advantages in terms of increasing workflow process efficiency. In a typical health care facility
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The use of health information technology (HIT) has been considered by both the public and private sectors in order to provide better health care services, as well as lower its costs. The electronic health records (EHRs) system is one of the innovations looked upon by several health institutions and organizations that could lower the expense of health care and at the same time give improved care quality.
Tatum states, “Electronic health records are copies of an individual’s medical history that is stored as electronic data”. According to Walker, Bieber, and Richards electronic medical records improve communication of clinical data that facilitates doctors and concerned health professionals carry out their duties effectively and efficiently.
Butler and Lathram (2005) state that it is one of the main tools currently being used to fix the ailing health care system through patient monitoring which will enable doctors to shift from only curing ailments to preventing them instead. One of the main goals for using this system is to increase efficiency within the healthcare system to the point of significantly reducing health care costs while saving millions of lives.
One of these improvements is the health information technology, particularly the employment of electronic medical records in healthcare institutions. According to Elekwachi (2008), electronic health records (EHR) pertains to the broad term for the patient records, whereas, electronic medical records (EMR) pertains to records operating within an organization.
ology service providers and IT giants such as Google and Microsoft are, developing and launching Electronic Medical Records (EMR) management sites and online applications (Kolbrum, 2008) such as “Google Health” and “TouchWorks EHR” that are mostly free-of-cost (Crounse,
These physicians claim that they have problems related with costs, data entry, technicalities, usability, and confidentiality of information and the security of the EMRs. These have generated heated debate about the usefulness of
Electronic health recording aids in enhancing efficiency within the health provider’s organization. This translates to improved patient handling and effective treatment to ensuring appropriate patient management.
The results show that the EHRs have great benefits such as improved quality and convenience of patient care, Improved Patient participation and Improved Diagnostics and patient outcomes. The research indicates 94 % of providers reporting improved availability
EHR system is designed to address more than the standard clinical data and may include wide views of the care a patient is given (Amatayakul & Lazarus, 2005). EHR have can store the diagnosis, medical history, medications, dates of immunization, plans for treatment, allergies, results of tests as well as radiology images of patients.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Will Electronic Medical Records Really Improve Health Care for FREE!