The Impact of Absorption and the ABC Method on Decision-Making - Research Paper Example

The impact of absorption and the ABC method on decision-making Submitted by: ACC 612: Spring American Table of Contents Table ofContents 2 Introduction 3 Literature review 3 The role of management accountants 3 The absorption and activity-based costing systems 5 Conclusion 12 Works Cited 14 Introduction Cost allocation is an essential tool for the management which is simply defined as a process of identifying, aggregating, and costs assigning to cost objects. A cost object is any activity or item for which you want to measure costs separately. Cost allocation provides important information for decision-making, promote efficient use of resources and it is required from standard setters for financial reporting. It is also used to distribute costs amongst departments, profitability calculation for departments and can be used in the derivation of transfer prices amidst subsidiaries. The cost of direct materials and direct labors are easy to trace to products. However, allocating indirect overhead costs are very complicated and not easily traced to products. Such indirect costs require predetermined overhead rates to be allocated. In this study, I will focus on the impact of traditional and activity-based cost allocations on decision makers. Literature review The role of management accountants Decision-making is a function preceded by a series of information gathering and analysis. The business environment is becoming more dynamic and volatile not to mention the ever increasing competition. Companies operate under the famous accounting concept (the going concern), which implies that the business’ operations should continue indefinitely. However, the life span of a business and more importantly, the performance are heavily influenced by the decisions made. Therefore, decision-making is a critical function in the organization. The managerial accounting is the organization’s department charged with the responsibility of providing the necessary information for decision-making. Consequently, the management accountant’s role is significant in the organization (Kaye, 1988; pp. 1-5). Managerial accounting includes the following activities: data distinguishing proof, measuring, information examination, and correspondence. The transmission of the data is important to upgrade educated choice making to encourage the accomplishment of the associations targets (Sawsan and Mostafa, 2012; pp. 1-5). It is the commitment of the administration bookkeeper to guarantee the usage of the procedure specified previously. The role of the administration bookkeeping and the administration bookkeeper are to plan, organize, control, direct, communicate and motivate. To start with, Planning is the essential capacity of the administration by a method for which the supervisors choose the objectives to be fulfilled and the course of activities to convey the objectives (Sawsan and Mostafa, 2012; pp. 1-5). Planning creates a mechanism that cautions the directors of conceivable future danger and, along these lines, persuades them to settle on an educated choice reliably. The managerial accountant serves to form systems the provide information necessary when making decisions concerning the products, the target business sector, and the proper costs. In addition, the administration bookkeeper dissects the capital planning recommendations (Sawsan and Mostafa, 2012; pp. 1-5). The second function is the control. It is the procedure that includes the examination of the real execution and the planned budget to recognize any conceivable deviation. The remedial action is executed on the occasion a deviation is recognized. Controlling can be characterized as the procedure of ensuring that the actual occasions exactly reflect the planned occasions (Kaye, 1988; pp. 1-5). The administration bookkeeping upgrades the procedure by giving execution assessment reports that contrast the genuine execution and the expected result of every activity. The administration bookkeeping is additionally anticipated to inform the directors about those particular exercises whose execution veer off from the arrangement (Kaye, 1988; pp. 1-5). The third function is organizing. It includes the establishment of the structure within which the obliged exercises are to be performed and the delegation of responsibilities to the relevant parties. Organizing includes the making of choice units, for example, office, segments, and branches. In this case, the management accountant is required to give data regarding the performance of each of these divisions. The fourth role is motivation. It includes the persuasion of human conduct so that the representatives relate to the destinations of the company and settle on choices that upgrade the accomplishment of objectives. It has been resolved that the representatives can be propelled by spending plans and execution reports delivered by management accountants. In any case, the targets must be a wellspring of inspiration when they are challenging, but, attainable in reality (Clinton and White, 2012; pp. 2-5). The fifth function is communication. The methodology of correspondence guarantees that data is shared starting with one individual then onto the next or starting with one division then onto the next. The management accountant improves the communication process by keeping up an effective arrangement of correspondence. The administration bookkeeping data framework is an illustration of a proficient data framework. The availability of necessary information ensures informed decision-making (Clinton and White, 2012; pp. 2-5). The absorption and activity-based costing systems Costing frameworks are data frameworks particularly for supervisors. They need a particular sort of data, for example, machine hours, direct work hours, and units delivered, to be of worth. Item costs and other data are dead set by the particular costing framework. In this manner, the outcomes got would rely on the costing framework utilized; subsequent to the same information could be connected or utilized as a part of distinctive ways. For this situation, the customary absorption costing framework or the activity based costing framework (ABC) (Gagne and Discenza, 1992; pp. 2-5). First, comparatively, when ascertaining the cost of production based on the absorption costing framework, all the expenses brought about by the creation procedure are identified with the items. Consequently, the variables of the framework are the aggregate yield cost and the units created. The quotient of the two variables is the generation cost of every unit. Then again, the activity based costing framework presents different new angles, for example, the cost drivers. Give us a chance to plunge deeper into the system for a superior comprehension of the distinction (Sartorius, Eitzen and Kamala, 2007; pp. 1-9). In order to execute the activity based costing framework, one ought to be acquainted with the accompanying terms: activity, activity cost pool, and cost drivers. An action, in this connection, is any activity, occasion, work or exchange that welcomes costs in both the assembling or appropriation process (Broad, and Crowther, 2001; pp. 2-7). Activity cost pool can be characterized as the overhead expenses credited to a specific sort of movement, for example, materials requesting expenses and machine establishment costs. Keeping in mind the end goal to attain an effective usage of the activity based costing, the accompanying steps are compulsory: activity identification, doling out the expense of assets to exercises, yield identification and allocation of activity expenses to yields (Sartorius, Eitzen and Kamala, 2007; pp. 1-9). Amid the first step (activity identification), the company ought to take part in a more profound examination of the working procedure of every responsibility center. Every procedure may include one or more work methods needed to deliver a yield. Amid the second step, appointing the expense of assets to exercises, the business takes part in following expenses to cost questions with a specific end goal to determine their reasons. Amid the third stage, yield identification, an association participates in the distinguishing proof of exercises that utilization its assets. Finally, the fourth step, assigning action expenses to yields, the activity expenses are allocated by action drivers to the yields in light of the level of interest in such exercises (Sartorius, Eitzen and Kamala, 2007; pp. 1-9). Taking into account the depiction, activity based costing unquestionably gives extra data concerning the production costs. The supplementary data given has shown how vital they are in the determination of item costs. Also, the extra data strikingly shows the expenses identified with items, consequently, improve the managerial decision-making. Along these lines, following the traditional absorption costing gives no such discriminating data, the execution of the activity based costing technique is situated in light of the managerial advantages it has for the Association (Cardinaels, Roodhooft, and Warlop, 2004; pp. 1-8). Second, activity based costing enhances the administration of operations in the company. As said over, two discriminating strides in the ABC framework are the distinguishing of expense pools and expense drivers. The present day framework then provides for the apportionment of the overhead expenses to the expense pools and exercises. The capacity to assign the production expense to the separate expense pools makes it simple to manage and control the pertinent expenses and accordingly, diminish the total manufacturing expenses. Evidently, the expense pools are diverse (Gagne and Discenza, 1992; pp. 2-5). In this way, the definition of control measures ought to be custom-made to each of the expense pools. The traditional absorption costing system makes the methodology inconceivable. Nonetheless, because of the presentation of the activity based costing framework, it is conceivable and simple to define control measures customized at every expense pool. The methodology enhances viability with which the organizations operations are improved, thus, improves decision-making (Letza and Gadd, 1994; pp. 2-7). Third, the activity based costing framework enhances the viability and productivity of the company. The way that the framework makes it simple to determine the wellspring of undesirable results amid the manufacturing process makes the detailing and execution of the fitting restorative measures exact. The capacity of the organization to instantly execute medicinal measures is a showing of the viability. The cutting edge framework is more productive in expense administration than the traditional absorption framework. Hence, the ABC is the proper system for lessening the working expense. The methodology hence makes the organization more productive (Letza and Gadd, 1994; pp. 2-7). Dynamic organizations work at negligible cost and keep up the quality of items. In marketing, the consistent conveyance of value is an effective strategy. In light of the intense competition among adversary organizations, the reliable quality conveyance is an aggressive quality. Along these lines, the procurement of unrivaled quality is a discriminating fixing in building up a resolute stage for supportable profit. It was likewise said that productivity means working at a negligible expense (Cohen, Venieris, and Kaimenaki, 2005; pp. 1-4). The ABC framework makes it simple to decrease the working expenses, hence expanding the productivity levels. Gainful organizations appreciate gigantic budgetary adaptability and flexibility. Such organizations are fit for seeking after productive ventures that build their future worth, thus, development rate. Basically, the execution of the ABC framework makes this conceivable. Hence, the ABC system facilitates effective decision-making (Letza and Gadd, 1994; pp. 2-7). Fourth, the ABC framework upgrades the budgeting procedure. Budgeting is an idea that alludes to the procedure of monetizing an individuals or associations arrangement to encourage the accomplishment of destinations inside a characterized period. Budgetary planning can be considered as a brief estimation and checking of seemingly perpetual key arrangements of the company (Broad, and Crowther, 2001; pp. 2-7). Strategic planning involves the plan of vital arrangements that state and depict the objectives to be sought after and attained to concerning the corporate strategy system. Accordingly, through budgeting, a long haul corporate arrangement can be transformed without hesitation. Since the ABC system facilitates the budgeting process, it ensures effective decision-making. To have the capacity to set up a financial plan for a company, the administration ought to be mindful of the accompanying four stages: data gathering, Planning and organizing, budget preparation and control measures (Benjamin, Muthaiyah, and Marathamuthu, 2009; pp. 2-6). Step one – data gathering – the chronicled information is transformed regarding different issues, for example, the business objectives and targets, and the general business environment, for example, rivals and the monetary components (Schick, 1985; pp. 1-5). The gathered data identifies with the past execution of the organization and ought to be liable to further investigation. In this way, the administration ought to expect particular variables, for example, deals level, the normal interest level, and value levels, to help the planning methodology. Suspicions are made taking into account the past data. The ABC encourages the determination of precise expense. It, accordingly, upgrades the social affair of precise data and facilitates decision-making (Schick, 1985; pp. 1-5). Step two – planning and association – planning includes the detailing of objectives to be attained to by the company. Also, it incorporates the procurement of a progression of exercises to be actualized to encourage the accomplishments of the planned objectives (Shulian and Jun, 2011; pp. 1-6). When the planning procedure is finished, the process of organizing is launched. Organizing includes the ascertainment of the accessible assets, monetary, physical and human. In this stride, keeping up productive correspondence process between the gatherings partaking in the budgeting process is basic to the achievement of the procedure. Productive correspondence methodology upgrades the trading of complete and exact data on matters, for example, the level of human and monetary assets accessible in an association. The step is, therefore, significant in the decision-making process (Shulian and Jun, 2011; pp. 1-6). Step three – spending plan preparation – in this stride, the verifiable data accumulated about the company’s past execution is joined with the suppositions, the organization’s destinations and strategies and the data on asset accessibility. The consequence of the data mix is utilized in forecasting, for example, the income levels, the item request levels, and the use levels. ABC framework gives real data suitable to frame the premise of the specified projections (Piercy, 1987; pp. 2-4). Step four – control – the actual result of an organizations exercises can be analyzed against the budget. That is; the financial backing can be utilized as an instrument that pushes for the accomplishment of an associations destinations. A variation would occur because of different components other than falsely recorded data. ABC framework guarantees a practical determination of such information. Along these lines, the current framework is of basic significance to the administration process (Piercy, 1987; pp. 2-4). Fifth, as said above, ABC framework upgrades the budgeting procedure. Accordingly, it can be derived that it guarantees the accomplishment of the reasons for budgeting. The accompanying is the reasons of the financial backing: coordination, correspondence, control, motivation, clarification of responsibility and authority and planning. To begin with, budgeting guides the planning procedure. Planning is characterized by the procedure of setting destinations and objectives and the course of moves to be made keeping in mind the end goal to guarantee the accomplishment of the objectives. In light of the definition, a financial plan shows the organization the bearing toward attaining to its goals (Gordon and Loeb, 2006; pp. 1-9). Second, the budget can be used as a control tool. The Riptide PLC management team can use the budget to measure the organization’s actual performance against the planned performance (target/ budget). In addition, a budget is majorly used to detect variances and formulate the most suitable corrective measures depending on the situation. An example of a corrective measure is implementing measures in a bid to reduce the cost incurred when manufacturing product XYI. Therefore, a budget can be used as a control tool, or it can induce the act of control. Thus, it is important. As a result, the purpose works in tandem with the purpose mentioned above (Gordon and Loeb, 2006; pp. 1-9). Third, the budgeting process enhances effective communication between various levels of management and between different functional departments within Riptide PLC. The enhancement of communication is achieved because the process involves liaison and discussion and consultation among all management levels. This ensures a proper coordination of activities. Therefore, budgeting can be used to facilitate communication within Riptide PLC thus it is of great significance. Consequently, the purpose complements the above-discussed purposes (Shulian and Jun, 2011; pp. 1-6). Fourth, budgets act as a motivator. The budget spells out the courses of action to facilitate the achievement of goals within a time frame. Managers are after that stimulated to utilize the allocated resources to meet the organization’s objectives. Managers are more motivated in instances where feasible goals are set. However, during instances where the budget presents a seemingly infeasible goal, the company’s management becomes demotivated. The achievement of the company’s objective is partly dependent on changing the costing method from absorption, which is the current system, to Activity Based Costing method. Since it is possible to change from one costing system to another, it is, therefore, possible to achieve the company’s objective. In turn, the management would be encouraged to work tirelessly to achieve the company’s objectives (Schick, 1985; pp. 1-5). Fifth, coordination among the functional divisions of the organization is fundamental. The budgetary process is not finished without the consideration of the money related estimation of exercises in every functional division inside the organization. The methodology may oblige cross-checking of information between functional divisions within the company. The movement makes a level of collaboration, hence expanding coordination of individuals between different functional divisions within the organization. Thus, coordination, as a reason, collaborates easily with alternate purposes of planning (Shulian and Jun, 2011; pp. 1-6). Last, the clarification of obligation and power is critical to the organization. It helps center endeavors of different managers on a particular errand, subsequently lessening the possibilities of copying endeavors. Likewise, wastage of assets is minimized. An unmistakably settled hierarchy of leadership lessens power struggles, accordingly minimizing clashes between distinctive levels of supervisors within the company. Consequently, the process of decision-making is made frictionless (Schick, 1985; pp. 1-5). Conclusion As described above, ABC system provides additional information necessary for decision-making. The system facilitates both accurate cost estimation and budgeting. The company directors need accurate information for decision-making. Unlike the traditional absorption costing system, the ABC system provides such information. Thus, it enhances effective decision-making. Works Cited Benjamin, Samuel Jebaraj, Saravanan Muthaiyah, and M. S. Marathamuthu, 2009. "An Improved Methodology for Absorption Costing: Efficiency Based Absorption Costing (EBAC)." Journal of Applied Business Research 25.6 (2009): 87-104. ProQuest. Web. 12 May 2015. Broad, Martin, and David Crowther, 2001. "Activity Based Costing in Universities - an Inappropriate Technique?" Journal of Applied Accounting Research 6.2 (2001): 55-89. ProQuest. Cardinaels, Eddy, Filip Roodhooft, and Luk Warlop, 2004. "The Value of Activity-Based Costing in Competitive Pricing Decisions." Journal of Management Accounting Research 16 (2004): 133-48. Clinton, B. D., and Larry R. White, 2012. "The Role of the Management Accountant: 2003-2012." Management Accounting Quarterly 14.1 (2012): 40-74. Cohen, Sandra, George Venieris, and Efrosini Kaimenaki, 2005. "ABC: Adopters, Supporters, Deniers and Unawares." Managerial Auditing Journal 20.8 (2005): 981-1000. Gagne, Margaret L., and Richard Discenza, 1992. "Accurate Product Costing in a JIT Environment." International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28.4 (1992): 28. Gordon, Lawrence A., and Martin P. Loeb, 2006. "Budgeting Process For Information Security Expenditures." Communications Of The ACM 49.1 (2006): 121-125. Kaye, G. R., 1988. "The Role of Management Accountants in Information Strategy." Journal of Information Technology 3.4 (1988): 251-64. Letza, Steve R., and Ken Gadd, 1994. "Should Activity-Based Costing be Considered as the Costing Method of Choice for Total Quality Organizations?" The TQM Magazine 6.5 (1994): 57. Piercy, Nigel, 1987. "Advertising Budgeting: Process And Structure As Explanatory Variables." Journal Of Advertising 16.2 (1987): 34-40. Sartorius, K., C. Eitzen, and P. Kamala, 2007. "The Design and Implementation of Activity Based Costing (ABC): A South African Survey." Meditari Accountancy Research 15.2 (2007): 1-21. Sawsan, Saadi Halbouni, and Kamal Hassan Mostafa, 2012. "The Domination of Financial Accounting on Managerial Accounting Information." International Journal of Commerce & Management 22.4 (2012): 306-27. Schick, Allen G., 1985. "University Budgeting: Administrative Perspective, Budget Structure, And Budget Process." Academy Of Management Review 10.4 (1985): 794-802. Shulian, Deng, and Peng Jun, 2011. "Reforming The Budgeting Process In China." OECD Journal On Budgeting 2011.1 (2011): 75-89. Read More