Nobody downloaded yet

Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) - Coursework Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Case of Holmes v. South Carolina Criminal Law Hypothetical Facts: In the year of 1989, a woman of 86 year of age was assaulted, raped and robbed at her residence in South Carolina. The injuries resulted from attack led to the death of the woman in the following year…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)"

Download file to see previous pages However Holmes denied the charges and confessed that the crime was committed by a third party named Jimmy Mc Caw White. Holmes was of the opinion that the police framed him in this crime. Defendant also produces several witnesses who claimed that the third party was found in the premises of the crime scene during the hours of crime. Holmes produced several witnesses to prove that he was innocent in this case and was trapped by the police. He also asserted that the forensic results were manipulated by poor handling by the police officer. Issue: Is Holmes guilty for the death of the old women in South Carolina? Any case in order to be justified needs solid evidence against the person who is guilty. Moreover there is argument from the defendant that police his trying to frame him .Holmes suggested that The crime was committed by a third party and also produced witnesses for the same. The only proof against Holmes was the palm print, fiber of clothing and DNA elements found at the vicinity and on victim respectively. .It was a known fact that the police officer handling the case dealt with evidence collection in a negligent manner. He collected the samples with bare hand and henceforth the results were not trust worthy. The issue before the court is that, on what basis they can prove the guiltiness of the defendant as to the crime. How can the court claim that Holmes committed the crime on the women? Court draws conclusion based on evidence found at the crime scene .With regard to this case all the forensic evidence provided was unreliable due to the poor handling of samples by the police officer. Rule: According to federal rule of evidence, rule 702 is a key one. Cornell University of law(2010) states that “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case”. Analysis: The Federal rule of evidence is crucial here as the whole case is centered around the validity of the forensic evidence found on the vicinity and victim. Once a crime is committed there should be strong evidence against the defendant in order to sentence the defendant. Even though, the evidence is found, the authenticity of it cannot be established due to the manipulation of them by the police officer. . The forensic result of the crime scene was not authentic as the police officer collected the samples without using gloves. This is against the law as samples are not obtained following the principles laid down by the civil procedure. Since the reliability of the evidence is very questionable, the court cannot pass any order against Holmes which prove him guilty Conclusion: Since the U.S. Supreme Court was not satisfactory about the credibility of the forensic results, there are no grounds to accuse the defendant of the crime. At the same time the probability of the involvement of the third party was ruled out on the basis of evidence found on the crime scene. Finally it can be concluded that Holmes involvement in the rape and murder could not be established due to lack of genuine evidence. Work cited Law School, Cornell University. (2010, December). ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) Coursework”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1405167-brief-the-case-of-holmes-v-south-carolina
(Brief the Case of Holmes V. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) Coursework)
https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1405167-brief-the-case-of-holmes-v-south-carolina.
“Brief the Case of Holmes V. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) Coursework”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1405167-brief-the-case-of-holmes-v-south-carolina.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)

CLS v. Martinez, 561 U. S

...?A LEGAL BRIEF ON THE RECENT U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING IN CLS V. MARTINEZ, 561 U. S. On June 28, the United s Supreme Court gave a ruling on the CLS vs. Martinez, 561 US ___130 S.Ct. 2971, 177 L.Ed.2d 838 (2010). The case was filed by the Christian Legal Society (CLS) at the Hastings College of Law at University of California on the ground that official governing groups should accept all the students regardless of their beliefs and status to acquire recognition. The respondents were Leo Martinez, Acting Chancellor and Dean of Hastings College of Law, University of California; Jacqueline Ortega, Student Services Director; the Board of...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio

...? Case Brief: Terry v. Ohio of the of the For many years now, Police in the United s have engaged in investigative practices which are commonly known as ‘Stop and Frisk’. This process normally involves the stopping of a person or vehicle with the purpose of interrogation or a brief investigation. This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine

...? Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine Table of Contents I. Facts 3 II. Issue 4 III. Decision 4 IV. Reasons 5 References 8 I. Facts Wyeth markets the drug Phenergan, the generic name of which is promethazine hydrochloride, which is indicated for nausea, as an antihistamine medication. In its injectable form, it can be administered either as a drip, known as an IV-drip, or as a vein-injectable, in a procedure known as an IV-push. It is known that Phenergan can cause gangrene when it is able to get into the artery of a patient, because of its corrosive nature. Such is the case with the plaintiff Levine in this case, whose right hand and later the whole forearm was...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief

...?Terry v. Ohio Case Brief The short of Terry v. Ohio can be explained as the U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the 4th amendment prohibition pertaining to unreasonable search and seizures. The decision of the court states that the 4th Amendment right is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect in the street and proceeds to frisk him even though there is no visible probably cause to arrest the person. Rather, the act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous. This was the decision that the courts reached when...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Case Brief - MATHEWS v. ELDRIDGE, 424 US 319 (1976)

...?Case Brief - MATHEWS v. ELDRIDGE, 424 US 319 (1976) AND CITATION The case i.e. MATHEWS v. ELDRIDGE, 424 US 319 (1976) is a proceeding of Supreme Court, related to the termination of benefits linked with social security of Mr. George Eldridge on his disability. The petitioner in this case was Mr. F. David Mathews, while the defendant was Mr. George Eldridge (OYEZ, “Mathews v. Eldridge”; Legal Information Institute, “Powell, J., Opinion of the Court”). FACTS OF THE CASE MATHEWS v. ELDRIDGE, 424 US 319 (1976) is a litigation of the Supreme...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

North Carolina v. Norman

...? North Carolina v. Norman Introduction Despite all the efforts taken by feminists, women still suffer from terrible discrimination. Even in the most developed countries they are severely abused by men everywhere: at work, in families or simply in the street. When a woman is abused in the street or at work, which are public places, she usually applies to court as there are many witnesses of the abuse and she was abused by an alien. When a woman is abused in her family by her beloved husband, the situation is much more difficult. Hundreds of women are killed by their husbands every year. Others simply suffer violence and humiliation and prefer to keep silence to save their family relations with sadists,...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Case Brief - McGurn v Bell

...Case Brief RE: McGurn v. Bell Microproducts, Inc. Facts George McGurn met with the president of the Bell microproducts who gave the position of the company. At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause specifying that in case his contract was terminated he will be given half his commissions plus six months’ salary. Following several discussions with an official from Bell, Bell issued him with a contract devoid of the termination clause which he rejected. During one of these discussions, McGurn said that a termination clause covering his initial...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief U.S v. Hinkley

...Case Brief U.S Vs Hinkley Facts On March 30, 1981, a man d John W. Hinckley Junior shot the then US President Ronald Reagan in an attempt to assassinate him. During the process, he hit and wounded four people who were present on the scene: President Reagan, the Presidential Press Secretary, a Secret Service Agent and a Metropolitan Police Officer. Hickley was immediately arrested and subsequently faced trial for prosecution in the Legal Court of the Columbia district of the USA. Hinckley’s lawyers argued that he was suffering from schizophrenia and his actions were a result of his impaired mind. The defense attorneys also presented medical evidence in the Court which supported their claim. On July 21,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Case

...Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council Case Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council Case In the year 1986, Lucas purchased 2 residential lots on a barrier island in South Carolina. He had the intention of constructing homes for single families, such as those already built on the adjacent parcels. In 1988, the state legislature enacted the Beachfront Management Act. This barred Lucas from building any habitable structure that was permanent on his purchased parcels. This resulted in him filing a suit against the state agency that was respondent, contending that while the act was lawful, the construction...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina

...in the school premises (J.D.B v. North Carolina, 564 U. S. ____ (2011)). Rationale The court does not consider the questioning of J.D.B. in the school premises as custodial setting. The court also found that the case of J.D.B. did not require adherence to Miranda warnings. In stead, the trial court found J.D.B. guilty of the theft crime, which was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. The court adopted a different path to reach the case decision although it had been held in previous court decisions that a child’s age rightly informs Miranda custody issue. A child’s age is a significant factor, irrespective of the fact that interrogation...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Coursework on topic Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) for FREE!

Contact Us