Antitrust Law - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Antitrust Laws and Applications 1 Abstract The antitrust laws are designed to prevent unfair competition as a result of market might or shrewd manipulation. The United States’ economy is based on open competition and fair dealings, assuring competitive pricing and better products…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95% of users find it useful
Antitrust Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Antitrust Law"

Antitrust Laws and Applications The antitrust laws are designed to prevent unfair competition as a result of market might or shrewd manipulation. The United States’ economy is based on open competition and fair dealings, assuring competitive pricing and better products. Out-competing is considered acceptable, rigging the game is not. Several laws were passed between 1890 and 1940 which solidified the rules of competition among the very powerful. Although meant to abate the mighty from unfair competition, all businesses should be aware of these laws. Antitrust Laws and Applications 2 Antitrust Laws and Applications The major antitrust legislation from 1890 – 1940 included the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act and the Robinson-Patman Act. Each of the succeeding Acts clarified and built on the one preceding. Sherman Antitrust Act: The act criminalizes all agreements to reduce competition. Contracts, conspiracies and corporate vertical integration that unreasonably restrain interstate or foreign trade. (DOJ1, DOJ2) Agreements such as bid rigging, tying contracts or price fixing are illegal under this act. Monopolies, cartels and oligopolies can be unlawful under certain conditions. Any of these acts that reduce or restrain competition through predatory means is illegal. (DOJ1, DOJ2) The act reduces the strength of monopolies. Until 1890, large companies would suppress competition through anti-competitive conduct such as spot market sales, collusion with a few large suppliers or price fixing. Spot market sales occur when a large National or regional, interstate, company sells products at a low cost in one area to drive out local competition. Their losses are covered by operations in other areas where their business thrives. For example Standard Oil of New Jersey was found guilty of this practice in 1911. (Anderson and Johnson, 1999) Cartels or oligopolies thrive in conditions when very few competitors are in the same field of business. These orchestrated actions among the few, but powerful players, reduce competition by dividing markets, bid rigging or price fixing. This form of antitrust violation is the most Antitrust Laws and Applications 3 insidious because the market seemingly has competitors. Since this practice is so destructive to the economy, these violations are “per se” illegal; which means, if collusion can be shown, extra profit does not need to be proven for a conviction. If the parties participated, they are guilty. Tying contracts require a customer to purchase two products in order to get the high demand product delivered. Gasoline demand is relatively inelastic, people will continue to buy regardless of price rise. The distributer may require the retailer buy motor oil as well in order to have the right to buy gasoline. This act drives local and small motor oil distributers out of business. The Sherman Act was Congress’ first attempt to stop these predatory practices. The Clayton Act clarified and refined the Sherman Act. Clayton Act The Clayton Act outlaws mergers and acquisitions that are likely to lessen competition. The economics of expansion can be very competition unfriendly. Companies can either buy competitors or suppliers. If they merge with competitors, fewer competitors are in the market and one competitor may control the market. If the company buys a supplier, and then refuses to sell to competitors or sells at inflated prices, competition suffers. The Clayton Act allowed Congress and the Federal Trade Commission oversight of large mergers and acquisitions. (DOJ2) Robinson-Patman Act The Robinson-Patman Act guides regulators by one ethic: Antitrust Laws and Applications 4 “to assure reasonably that businessmen at the same functional level would stand on equal competitive footing as far as price is concerned.” (Clark, 1995) The Act brought economic analysis to bear on the ethic of monopoly power and collusion. (Clark, 1995) The question was asked, can a rational predatory firm expect to gain anything less than the current value of their losses sustained by price cutting their competition out of business. (Paterson and Mueller, 1984) Secondarily, will competitors enter a market knowing these predators will price them back out. The loss sustained by the price war may pay dividends when no other competitors enter the business. (Anderson and Johnson, 1999) Enforcement Violators are subject to jail terms, fines and civil penalties of triple damages to the competitors harmed by the unscrupulous practices. (DOJ2) Business Behavior There are several risk management techniques to avoid these antitrust arrangements. First, purchase supplies and materials from either unrelated firms or at “arms length”. Do not collude with competitors to rig bids, divide territory or price fix. Avoid any appearance of wrongdoing. To the extent that competitors are friendly on a personal level, business chatter should be kept to very general topics. Antitrust Laws and Applications 5 Some more subtle strategies include broadening the definition of the companies industry. If the competitors become too large or few in the cell phone business, they advertise as communications business. Now, these firms compete with email, faxes, the post office, telegraphs and land line phone companies. The percentage of control drops appreciably. To avoid prosecution, exclusionary or favoritism in selling to retailers is avoided. One master price list or discounts for volume, but allow all buyers the same purchase conditions. The FTC also deals with deceptive advertising. The company should avoid deception through forthright and honest communications with clients and the public. Antitrust Laws and Applications 6 References Anderson, Rod W. and Johnson, Ronald N. (1999) Antitrust and sales-below-cost laws: the case of retail gasoline. Review of Industrial Organization, 14: 189-204. Clark, Donald S. (1995) The Robinson-Patman act: general principles, commission proceedings, and selected issues. Secretary, Federal Trade Commission. Speech Before The Ambit Group. Web: Department of Justice (DOJ 1). Antitrust enforcement and the consumer. DOJ 2. Price fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation schemes: what they are and what to look for. An Antitrust Primer. Paterson, Thomas W. and Mueller, Willard F. (1984) State sales-below-cost laws: a legal- economic analysis of effectiveness.” AAE WP-80. University of Wisconsin. Web: Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Antitrust Law Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Antitrust Law Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Antitrust Law Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Questions in Antitrust law. Case examples

...Questions in Antitrust Law Question Antitrust laws are body of governing principles that seek to enhance favorable business environment through promoting fair competition as well as protecting consumers in addition to wronged competitor businesses against anti-competitive practices within the business environment. Antitrust laws aim at removing aspects of monopoly within business environments and unfair business practices (Hylton 45). According to Hylton (47), actions that are deemed to be capable of hurting business operations and/or consumers are regarded those that contravenes antitrust laws. Such...
19 Pages(4750 words)Essay

Antitrust Law HW

...?Antitrust Law Anti-trust laws make it illegal to continue such business practices that encourage monopolistic behavior. The Sherman Antitrust Act 1890 outlawed "every contract, combination…or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce" between states or foreign countries (, 2011). The Sherman Act pronounces such contracts, alliances, and planning illegal that limits flow of commerce between states and in foreign trade as well. Firms in competition cannot reach agreements on price-fixing, manipulating bids, and selection of customers. Monopolistic firm behavior is criminal, therefore, not permitted by the Sherman Act. When competitor companies enter into...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Antitrust Law Case

...? Antitrust Law Case Antitrust Law Case Antitrust laws can be defined as acts adopted by congress to ban or hinder business practices considered being monopolistic or restraining interstate commerce. A clear example is the Sherman antitrust Act of 1890 between states or foreign countries. The Clayton Act 1914 amended by Robinson Patman Act 1936 prohibits discrimination among customers through pricing and does not allow competition. Interstate commerce includes business within a state that affects the flow of that trade thus making it explicit. The antitrust laws are defined as state and...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Antitrust Law: Railroad Antitrust Immunity

...? Antitrust Law Antitrust Law Introduction Antitrust law consists of three key aspects ly, prohibition of abusive behavior through a company dominating a market or anti-competitive actions that can result to such domination. Anti-competitive practices controlled in this manner can encompass predatory pricing, tying, refusal to deal, and such. Another aspect is supervision of mergers as well as acquisitions of big companies and this includes some joint ventures. Transactions that are regarded as a threat to the competitive procedure can be banned or recommended subjects to “remedies” for instance an requirement to divest part of combined...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Does google violate the antitrust law

... Does Google Violate The Anti-Trust Law? The antitrust law is setup in the US to preserve the rights of businesses of having a chance to compete equally in market. The antitrust law is violated if an activity exists that brings one company ahead of its competitors in a way that monopolies pitch in. Google was charged with antitrust and anti-competition statutes as they were thought to arrange their search results in a way that brings their own products and links above others. Since more than 70% of search on internet is carried out on Google and many businesses depend on online advertising, several giant companies feared they will not show up in search results because Google tends to advertise its own products and hence is giving... an...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Business Ethics; Constitutional Law; Antitrust and Monopoly

...requirements. Upcoming business enterprises must comply with these rules and regulations (Steven, 2008 p.78). Antitrust in the business world explains how it seeks to make sure that business enterprises compete fairly in the market. This in the past, has had an effect on the economy of many countries in the world. With beliefs that free, commercial trade is advantageous to consumers, businesses and economy, this law restricts monopolization and restraints of trade activities. Four main areas emanate from this: pursuit of monopoly power, agreements between competitors, contract arrangements between buyers and sellers and business mergers (Keith, 2007 p.120). A monopoly is a market whereby there is only...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Business Property and Antitrust Law

...Introduction This present paper analyze on how business property and anti-trust law affects the decision-making and operations at Microsoft Corporation. Impact of business property law on decision-making and operations at Microsoft Corporation In regards to the nature of Microsoft Corporation’s business, the business property law affects their decision-making process and operations, as they cannot integrate patented intellectual property into their range of products and services, and a violation of this law can make the corporation liable to huge fines. Impact of anti-trust law on decision-making and operations as Microsoft Corporation According to...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Antitrust Practices

...ANTITRUST LAWS F.T .C investigating Antitrust against Google Reason for Antitrust investigation The Federal Trade Commission raised the ante in its antitrust conformation with Google. This commission prepared that the government was to sue the search giant. The main focus for F.T. C was whether Google manipulated search results in a quest to favor their own products. This made it quite difficult for other competitors and their products to get a fair share of representation and marketing on a results page. F.T.C investigators were looking for a wide range of Google business malpractices like displaying results that favor Google commerce services like...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Antitrust Law for FREE!

Contact Us