Article Analysis of Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal and Is Los Angeles Style Sprawl Desirable - Book Report/Review Example

Article Review Two articles, entitled “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal” and “Is Los Angeles Style Sprawl Desirable” were reviewed. These two articles depicted some of the common issues linked to urban planning, in particular. These include urban sprawl, efficient use of land prior to affordable housing, and other relevant problems. The two articles significantly provide essential information for understanding the appropriate ways and means to take in order to implement a policy or design. The two articles specifically point out the basics of urban planning down to the relevant issues associated with them. From the point of view of ordinary people, the two articles provide relevant issues to understand in order to learn many things about the appropriate implementation of design or policy in urban planning. Urban planning, as based on the information stated in the two articles is either opposed to development or part of the development process. The Los Angeles Style Sprawl for instance is critically evaluated in the article, in order to provide the vital information that could be supposed of great help for policy makers in their process of making decision and design. The way the article presented the problems that are linked to urban planning creates an essential understanding on how design and policy making process should be rightly considered and taken into great consideration. After all, urban planning is linked to the relevant role of development and this substantially support the fact that development cannot be considered as such if in the first place there are potential harms or detriments to the society that it poses much. The two articles specifically point out the importance of understanding the probable problems connected to the improvement of an urban location. This is the reason why planning is necessary in the first place. Development could trigger some problems and not just advancement at some point, as what the two articles are trying to suggest, as far as the relevant issues they consider are concerned. The planning process is an essential part of the urban development, for what has to be done should be substantially considered at this part of the development. However, it is clear that part of the planning process should be the consideration of potential pros and cons of the proposed development plan. Here where the role of urban planning takes it place and as what the two articles suggested. These articles are not just critical consideration of the probable harms that may be brought by development, but they are trying to guide the policy makers and those who would execute the entire plan and design. It is therefore important to consider some articles like these in order to provide vital insights prior to making some additional action plan in the process. The articles, however, specifically provide as much as possible a good point of view to look at. They are specifically not oppose to urban planning and other related development plan in the urban area, but what they specifically consider is the idea of emphasizing the linked troubles that may be crucial to the implementation of any proposed plan for development. Urban planning is a great tool for development. It ensures how to place everything in order. It is a way of organizing development, specifically in a sophisticated manner, at some point. It seeks to always find the optimum area or place of development. Not only that, it seeks to forecast future development and its associated costs and risks. This is therefore the reason, why the two articles are good materials for urban planners, because of their relevant insights as to the costs and risks linked to urban planning. Urban planning is also helping development to take a right shape. Urban area is a complex space. It is a space that is not just bombarded with social interactions, but above all, it is a place for both socio-economic and political considerations. The way the articles presented this point is straightforward. In fact, the economic impact of urban development is one essential target of the issues considered by the two articles. It is good to point the costs and risks, but the articles are trying to emphasize the probable implications of developing one area. These implications remarkably state the economic standing of other factors or aspects of development. Development therefore as pointed by the articles should be encompassed by a plan. It is necessary for an urban location to target development and continuous improvement, but with a plan for it. That is why it is necessary to significantly embrace some insights as to what should be the probable drawbacks of development. It is not bad to go for development in the first place, and this is the silent thought that the article would want to emphasize. However, it is necessary to consider the potential drawbacks so as to formulate the right plan prior to development. The two articles therefore sound like much of an economic article, after they have weighed the important costs and risks linked to urban development. However, their point is far beyond that. The articles at the bottom line are trying to suggest potential alternatives for developing an urban area, which could be richly included in the entire process of planning, just prior to the actual implementation. Thus, it is necessary to consider such insights, because it specifically leads to actual development, if rightly justified and implemented at some point. For policy makers, the articles are good reads for them, because these could not only provide them with insights, but above all, a more thorough understanding of what development is all about and what does it take to achieve it without even trying to overlook some probable costs or risks in the process. The policy makers are therefore guided with the right insights concerning the costs and risks of urban planning. However, it is also essential to review the articles and even test their view points in the actual setting, if truly they make sense at all. The purpose of the two articles are just to educate its readers, particularly the policy makers in order to suggest ideas on how to substantially adhere to a balance or fair dealing with urban development. Read More