Portfolio of evidence - Research Paper Example

In this scenario, the participative arrangements that require action in health and safety are induction and training, communication arrangements and issue resolution. Enhancing environmental health and safety requires the use of induction and training. Using this method, then health and safety should be integrated into the overall training program. There are training programs that are normally conducted in the workplace. Integrating health and safety therefore, is not a hard exercise (Plunkett & Fournier, 1991).

These actions are done by the employees in the workplace because they are the ones who need to be trained in the various aspects of health and safety. It is the responsibility of every employee in a particular organization to undertake the training. Adequate training in health and safety will ensure that the employees at the workplace are aware of the various safety measures that should be followed as well as the precautions to be taken so as to ensure that their health and safety is not compromised.

Another group of responsible people would be the committee for health and safety that is stationed in the workplace. This committee may include managers and directors. The training exercise would take place twice in a year. The first session would be conducted through the months of February and March while the second session would be conducted through the months of October and November. The training program is not a strenuous exercise therefore making it easy to be conducted at least twice in a year.

This will help in increasing the efficiency of the training program. Furthermore, by conducting it twice a year, it will increase the number of employees who go through the training program thereby making it even more efficient. This will ensure that a large number of people go through the program thereby increasing the safety of everyone. Just like any other program that is conducted in the work place, there is a progress monitoring aspect that must be added to it. The purpose of the progress monitor is so as to ensure that the program is actually achieving its desired objectives and is not just utilizing the organization’s resources.

The progress monitors can be the creators of the program. They are the people who came up with the program and therefore know very well the objectives that the program is supposed to achieve because they set the objectives themselves. In the event that the program is not achieving the desired goals, then recommendations would be made on whether to terminate the program or make changes to the original plan. Another group of program monitors would be the management team and directors of the company.

This is mainly due to the fact that they are the people who have funded the project, they would therefore want to make sure that their investments are not going to waste. It is a way of making sure that everything is working according to plan (Burke, Clarke & Cooper, 2012). However, there are instances whereby, things may not go according to plan. The program may go off course or an error may occur. In such a scenario, then there needs to be a form of mechanism whereby a corrective action can take place thereby ensuring that everything is brought back on track.

In addition to this, recommendations also need to be made so as to ensure that such an occurrence is avoided in future. These recommendations w