The unprecedented crowd that thronged the stadium and her friend kept her son experiencing great urge to walk alone. While walking through the entrance after the match, a friend tapped her back and just that moment she…
Download file to see previous pages...
The above scenario offers an example of cause-effect relationship in which one act directly yields effects. The woman let go the hand of the son who was adventurous and took the opportunity to walk around alone with the effect of becoming a missing person case. In this context, it can be observed that cause-effect relationship is subject to the concepts of necessary and sufficiency (Trapp,et al,pg.87).
Cause: A man who was almost being attacked by robbers escaped death narrowly on the hand of the mob that mistaken him to be the criminals. The robbers attacked the man in a corridor sandwiched between two walls. He raised alarm through shouting and calling for help. The members of the public took position at the end of the corridor awaiting any person who would appear running and lynch under the possibility of being the robbers. Unfortunately, the robbers jumped over the walls and vanished into the nearby woods. The shaken victim took to his heals and just as he popped out of the corridor, the mob descended on him with kicks and blows. It took the intervention of the police to disperse the crowd before he could give a convincing explanation that shocked the public. He was the victim and the robbers wittingly escaped over the walls. The likelihood of walking through the corridor and being attacked by the robbers are correlated but that did not cause the members of public to attack him.
Trapp, Robert, and William J. Driscoll. Discovering the World Through Debate: A Practical Guide to Educational Debate for Debaters, Coaches and Judges. New York: International Debate Education Association, 2005.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Premise: There is a presumption of innocence until found guilty. Conclusion: Casey Anthony should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a fair trial. My friend’s argument is: Premise: Caylee Anthony was missing for over 30 days. Premise: A parent that does not report their child missing for 30 days is guilty of murder.
ample of a testimony without any interpretation from the poet’s view point, though the selection of this narrative is by itself an interpretation of the existing history, and an act of rewriting history to fore ground the marginalized narratives within the events of holocaust;
The mother, who feels the stinging pain at heart for the unborn children and laments their loss, stands for motherhood and love.
Citations and how they relate to the argument: 1. (line 3) the line speaks of the unborn children and
etter understand what is being said, they are still unable to grasp the fundamentals and purposes of the argument if the biggest thing they have to rely on is a picture or a graph. Though the author believes that these sorts of techniques can contribute more to written text,
The topic was whether or not Manchester United would be able to beat Arsenal in one of the matches. Since his favorite team was Arsenal, he had obvious reasons to support Arsenal. On the other hand, I have always remained
Randy Barnett is one of the scholars who justify boiler plate enforcement. He argues that people cannot consent to the legally bound even if they don’t know what the terms are as long as they aren’t radically unexpected.
According to the theory of contrast
The difference between Hansen’s presentation and that of others is that he is talking from experience and something which he has personally dealt with in line of duty. This makes his argument much more effective