She owns the creative force of nature male or female for the initial nine months as such her status is more equal. But since time immemorial and even now, the ground realities are different. If her man gives her protection…
Download file to see previous pages...
In this paper an effort has been made to elaborate how Mrs. Peters breaks away from traditional gender roles for women of her era to take on her husband’s role as sheriff, but, in this process, seems to abandon being “married to the law” and is ultimately “loyal to her sex.” The narrowed down topic, for the purpose of this paper, is ‘crime solving.’
Does Mrs. Peters know about the evidence-based approach to investigations in crimes? Crime investigation and evidence acceptable to the law are alternative beats of the same heart. Her priority seems to narrow down on the possible perpetrator of the crime, and to achieve her purpose she is inclined to sidetrack the legal angle to start with. The asset of the woman is her sixth sense is invariably sharper as compared to men and she is in a position to guess what is swept under the carpet, in this case, by the murderer. Just as a lie repeated a thousand times from a platform takes on the garb of truth, when women are often told that they are inferior to men, their thinking capabilities are no match to that of men, they actually believe it.
The line of action taken by the legal luminaries and by Mrs. Peters for investigation of the crime is different and it is in tune with their thinking. The thinking of the former is conditioned by legal requirements and as for Mrs. Peters she just wants to know the truth and she too seeks evidences that the official investigators would dismiss as trifles. Both are systematic in their approach of investigation but the domain of investigation of each one of them and their perspectives vary. The legal luminaries think that the interference of women led by Mrs. Peters in the investigation is unnecessary and not worthwhile. From the point of view of the Sheriff, kitchen is the least important place but for Mrs. Peters it is the most important place. The gender perspective of the author is clearly evident
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Trifles by Susan Glaspell Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1635922-trifles-by-susan-glaspell
(Trifles by Susan Glaspell Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Trifles by Susan Glaspell Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1635922-trifles-by-susan-glaspell.
This stereotype gives the idea that it is only men who are worried about important matters or think about taking big steps, and women do not spend a minute pondering over big matters. “Trifles” was performed by Glaspell's theater troupe in 1916, and the short story “A Jury of Her Peers” was adapted from it on March 5, 1917 (Gainor 42).
Thematically, Glaspell’s play, “Trifles” asserts that women in the traditional societies had no choices to make, in their lives. They were not allowed to work in the industries, participate in crucial decision-making processes, and hold public offices and titles (Glaspell 15). Most women lived like slaves in their own communities.
It brings to light cultural practices that were held in high esteem during this period in history. On the other hand, Trifles is a one-act play by Susan Glaspell whose first performance by the Provincetown Players at the Wharf Theatre took place on August 8, 1916.
The play uses setting, choices of staging, characters, symbolism, and irony to argue that when a complex perpetrator is a victim too, moral rightness is more important than legal rightness. The play evokes emotions that create the problem of justice because of the emotional trauma that Minnie experienced as an oppressed member of her society and marriage.
The case attained global attention, because first she claimed that a black man had hijacked her car and kidnapped her sons. Later Smith disclosed that she had been affected by mental health problems that caused troubles to her judgment. She made dramatic appearances on the media pleading for the rescue of her children.
Two men, the Sheriff, and the County Attorney open the play, which is set in the socio-economic upheavals of the patriarchal American society in the wake of the 20th century (Al-Khalili 132), and the plot of the story revolves around an investigation of the murder of John Wright.
The author has used various literary elements like strong plot, setting, character, gender conflict, symbolism etc. to focus the plight of women and to question the validity of a judicial system where the evidence of crime as confirmed by men is enough to charge the prime suspect of the crime.
These aspects include the keen observation of themes, styles, and characters in a novel or narrative. The analysis sometimes involves comparison between two books or novels. In this paper, the mentioned two books will be analyzed and comparison and contrast handled with enough and appropriate lucidity.
ost horrible criminals and is presently incarcerated at the Leath Correction Institution in Greenwood County, South Carolina, on a life sentence (with possibility of parole after 3 decades of imprisonment) for murdering her two children (was convicted on two counts of murder)