Comparison between Articles on Marijuana Use - Research Paper Example

Government Study of Marijuana Sees Medical Benefits by Strolberg presents research directed by the government in a bid to understand the effects of marijuana on humans. In this regard, the research outcome indicated that marijuana is very beneficial when used carefully under close supervision. In this regard, it is pointed out that some of the current medication do not contain some elements such as cannabinoids, which has very high medicinal value. Moreover, the article pinpoints that there is no probability of the use of marijuana by persons who use it for medical purposes later in life. In addition, the article points out that there is no link between the use of marijuana and other hard drugs; the use of marijuana does not lead to the use of hard drugs later in life. Since there have been regulations restricting the use of marijuana, the fact that the research was directed by the government, and found results that indicated the merits derived from medicinal marijuana, then the outcome was observed as a big blow to the current regulation.

The second article, Legalizing of Marijuana Raises Health Concerns by Rabin, Roni presents an issue on legislation on the use of marijuana for recreation purposes by various states in the United States of America. In this regard, the two articles address the issue of legislation on marijuana, which might lead to an increase in the number of people using the drug. In addition, the two articles agree that the use of marijuana with no supervision might hurt the health of the consumers; “Increased potency may be having unforeseen consequences. The human brain’s cannabinoid receptors are typically activated by naturally occurring chemicals in the body called endocannabinoids, which are similar to THC. It is revealed that there is a high density of cannabinoid receptors in parts of the brain that affect pleasure, memory and concentration. Some research suggests that these areas continue to be affected by marijuana use even after the “high” dissipates” (Rabin, 2013, para 8) and “Marijuana smoke, they said, is even more toxic than tobacco smoke, and can cause cancer, lung damage and complications during pregnancy” (Stromberg, 1999, para 9).

 According to Reni’s findings, teenagers are more vulnerable to additions, especially those that begin their smoking habits at a tender age get exposed to higher risks because young people who staring smoking early tend to smoke more often. According to Roni’s records, researchers have pointed out that users that develop such additions cannot quit and even when they quit, some negative impacts affect them greatly. This is because withdrawal symptoms; lack of appetite, mood swings, depression, anxiety, troubled sleep, and irritability revolves around their life. This becomes difficult for them to bear and many of them go back into smoking to gain energy and overcome the symptoms. Such young people end up unproductive and thus, it qualifies the posing of such regulations the government use of the drug. In some states, regulations have been passed to try to control the age at which legal marijuana can be used. For instance, in Washington, only adults aged twenty-one and above are allowed legally to use the drug for creational purposes.

On the other hand, experts have different views about marijuana because the stigma associated with it has slowly eroded and more and more people use it without fear. This means many more addicts get into drug use without restrictions, Thus, Roni`s findings are in line with experts, legalization of the drug has to be revised and stringent regulations formulate to handle the great outburst victims. In conclusion, the use of drag should have revived limitations and especially legal use as a recreational drug. This will help control and reduce the number of idol youths who use the drug wrongly and end up doing bad things, including crime. This comes in the wake of research findings that reveals young people who get addicted to drug use at much younger ages of around sixteen years, perform poorly on tests of brain functions, and especially poor test confirmation on executive functions. This means that the drugs have negative effects as opposed to the findings of the first article.