Personal Privacy VS National Security Personal Privacy VS National Security In the world today it is seen that the acts of terrorism have increased to the extent that they are interfering with the daily routine of human beings either directly or indirectly…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Because of this very reason different opinions have been formed regarding the methods which should be adopted to avert terrorism. Moreover it is seen that the roots of terrorism extend up to the general population and hence important measures are needed to root it out. Policies of counter terrorism are formed all over the world through which the governmental agencies aim to obtain information about individuals who are believed to be linked with the acts of terrorism. As the world has advanced it is seen that technology has had a great influence on these counter terrorism policies. The situation however gets complex when the question of intruding in the lives of people arises. The governmental bodies have been entitled by many governments to intrude the privacy of all the individuals who are considered to be linked with a certain act of terrorism. Privacy is one of the most fundamental rights laid down in almost every constitution formed by the countries. It is the duty of the governments to ensure that the citizens are getting this right regardless of the ethnicity, race, sex or religion of the concerned individual. It is this topic that has given rise to a debate between the government officials and the people who are concerned with privacy. While the government may be able to stop national threats, it’s not worth our personal privacy being violated and invaded like airport security groping young children, our personal information no longer being private and unnecessary video monitoring and surveillance. In 1787 Alexander Hamilton wrote that ‘to be safer, nations at length will become willing to run the risk of being less free’. This statement clearly means that national security threats at one time will be averted at any cost even if it harms the basic democratic rights of the citizens. With time it has been noticed that the statement was quite right as privacy has been denied to many individuals regardless of their association with any terrorist group. Previously privacy was considered as a privilege by the citizens which they could enjoy at any given cost however things have changed in the days today as the government is the sole authority which decides about the rights of individuals. In order to analyze a person the governmental bodies are using different methods through which their private data is being maintained. This data is then being used to identify the patterns or acts of the individuals and this whole process is known as data mining. If not legal, it is the moral responsibility of the government to maintain the privacy of all of its citizens, this being one of their basic rights. In some instances it is seen that the government does not apply limitations when they have to reach out to certain people. These acts include the new airport checking system which is harming the privacy of the individuals entering in different countries (U.S & Minow 2004). The rights of individuals to privacy has many benefits in itself. It protects the individuals from discrimination which may be done on the basis of the information that the authorities receive from them. And hence it can be said that the right to privacy can eliminate the social divide which may be created otherwise. Privacy of individuals
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Personal Privacy Vs. National Security Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1426183-personal-privacy-vs-national-security
(Personal Privacy Vs. National Security Research Paper)
“Personal Privacy Vs. National Security Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1426183-personal-privacy-vs-national-security.
1 Introduction Internet evolution has aided businesses to collect and store data in their databases from online business i.e. from the Internet. Customers visit websites and but products online. In order to do so, they provide information related to their credit cards, banking details, personal details etc.
The right to privacy in this context means that no individual or organization has the absolute right to divulge information relating to a person’s private life, which may portray such person in bad light. This is essential especially in protecting vulnerable persons such as celebrities and other public figures that are always under the watchful eye of the media, which is considered as always keen to make business by revealing delicate information which it considers newsworthy.
This essay discusses that at the present computer security has become a very critical issue. Security refers to the technique to discover as well as stop illicit utilization of our secret information or computer. In this scenario, some preventive measures enable us to stop criminal users from accessing and using some part of our computer system.
A whole range of methods have conventionally been proposed in order to counter this problem in the past, but all such efforts have generally went awry. The regulatory measures that have been taken with a view to addressing this issue have met with limited success.
Following this act of terrorism America became a war nation, everything in the country including policies were developed to fight terrorism. The measures taken by the government to protect the citizens were extreme. The federal government also went forth to establish an antiterrorism unit or a special police department that handles terrorist and terrorist related cases.
National security is paramount to both the people as well as the federal government. The relationship between individual privacy and national security is the basis of the controversies surrounding the topic. Although this topic is concerned with current issues that are of public concern, it is a wide topic.
Historical methods are technique or models that historians use to investigate or inquire about the past. Historians vary their method or approach of studying the subject constantly. This variation is normally determined by the period or era in which events are being studied.
The conclusion from this study states that the benefit of video surveillance cameras outweighs personal privacy reasons. Anyway, for those claiming their private space is invaded in the public, it is unexpected that one could use public space for private matters. People do not have to be insecure in front of cameras, not unless they are on a wrong agenda.
Security is one of the basic necessities of all the people so that they can live in a harmonious environment, hence to ensure security of personal and civil liberties there is a thin line which need not be crossed under any circumstances. To some extent violation of the rights of individuals as well as civil liberties to ensure the security of the nation is justified.