12 Angry Men, follows the murder trial of a teenaged Hispanic boy who is being tried for the murder of his father and focuses on the juries deliberation of the case. The boy has little in the way of an alibi, and all evidence proveshim being akiller. …
Download file to see previous pages...
If he is found guilty, the boy will receive the death penalty. The twelve jurors are tasked with determining whether or not the boy is guilty, and all but one are prepared to immediately declare the boy guilty. Juror number 8 (who is later identified as Mr. Davis) is the only member of the jury to cast a not guilty vote, forcing the jurors to consider the case in more detail. He does this despite believing that the boy is probably guilty because he feels that the process is important, as the jurors are supposed to reach their verdict beyond reasonable doubt. As the film progresses, the jurors review the case in detail and one by one come to the conclusion that the boy is in fact innocent of the charges. They eventually give a unanimous vote of ‘not guilty’, acquitting the young man. The 12 jurors are ordinary people who are strangers to one another and a brought to the same place to weigh up the evidence and to draw a unanimous conclusion. They bring with them their own biases and opinions. The main character in the movie, juror 8 is faced with an ethical dilemma, while he believes that the boy being accused is guilty of the crime, he feels that as a jury, him and the other jurors have a responsibility to consider the case that was presented to them, and whether the evidence supports the case. Under the United States Constitution, any accused of a crime is entitled to due process before a verdict or punishment is given. Juror 8 feels that not evaluating the case in detail is violating those rights, and persuades the other jurors to examine both the case and their personal biases surrounding it. The dilemma faced by juror 8 is to find a verdict for the crime that is reasonable, while he has to work with the individual personalities and biases of the other jurors. Ethically, juror 8 relies heavily on deontology . While his personal opinion is that the boy is probably guilty, he feels that as a jury they are obligated under law to give the case a reasonable consideration. As a consequence of this he casts an initial vote of ‘not guilty’. He does not cast the vote because he believes it, at this point he does not know one way or the other, but instead casts it in order to force the other jurors to discuss the case in more detail. It becomes evident as the film progresses that juror 8 and some of the other jurors begin to believe strongly that there is not sufficient evidence to convict the boy, and indeed that the boy is innocent of the crime. Here he exhibits strong evidence of virtue ethics . He believes that it would be wrong to convict the boy of murder when the evidence does not clearly support the fact. To solve this dilemma, juror 8 resorts back to the ethics of the law, evaluating each piece of evidence systematically and discussing with his fellow jurors. An example this is the evidence given by an eyewitness, who said that she had observed the boy murder his father. One of the jurors observed that she had marks on her nose indicating that she normally wore eyeglasses. Juror 8 presented a logical chain of thought to the other jurors, arguing that it was unlikely that the witness slept with her glasses on. The witness had reported casually looking out the window and seeing the murder, while the lights went out a second later. Juror 8 argues that she probably did not put her glasses on between waking up and observing the murder, as they were said to occur immediately after each other, and as a consequence saw the murder without glasses, in the dark, from 60 feet away. This argument was sufficiently strong to cause most of the jurors who did not already believe so to have reasonable doubt. A second dilemma that juror 8 faced was one particular
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“12 Angry men: The role of Ethics Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/education/1391643-ethics
(12 Angry Men: The Role of Ethics Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“12 Angry Men: The Role of Ethics Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1391643-ethics.
12 Angry Men A Review The film 12 Angry Men (1957) observes and reports on the jury system of the United States. The 18 year-old Spanish defendant draws five older gentlemen and seven middle aged men as his jury of peers. One juror is foreign born and one is from poverty.
Chestnut, as many people know, compiled a rich diary of day-to-day life during this period. Chestnut was a fanatical observer, a considerate reviewer and an arch critic of the affectation and apparition. When the war was over, Chestnut embarked on expanding her patchy narrative, an extensive process during which she enhanced her literary tactics and worked hard to enhance the illusory efforts.
The film 12 years A Slave uses Christianity and various racist pathologies to reveal the extent of slavery among the capitalistic society. Slave masters in the Antebellum South are portrayed as God-fearing as they use the bible to justify the various institutions they belong to.
Skills in leadership are applicable to many aspects. In a certain group, it is natural for one to stand out as a leader, but not necessarily to lead. Many people are mistaken by defining leadership as only a position and not seeing the importance that the result effective leadership could create.
When one thinks of the greatest translations of a book to film, two very often spring immediately to mind. It is not surprising, therefore, that in his glowing review of this film the renowned critic Vincent Canby referred to both when called All the President's Men "an unequivocal smash-hit-the thinking man's Jaws" (1976).
It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three
Within this context, the film Of Mice and Men, released in the year 1939, is noteworthy because the director Lewis Milestone deals with the theme of human relationships and tragedy from a different angle of view. Thesis statement: In the film Of Mice and Men, the
The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the
The setting is a room boiling in the summer heat with no air-conditioning except for a small fan and some windows. As the temperature rises the intensity of the situation begins to unfold. The story line provides examples
The same is the case in the film as the twelve jurors make their decision by systematically changing their belief on the guilt of the defender. Eleven of them decide that the boy is guilty without considering any of the evident effectively. They do so owing to the
5 Pages(1250 words)Movie Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Movie Review on topic 12 Angry men: The role of Ethics for FREE!