Analysis of Rosenzweig vs Givens - Assignment Example

Rosenzweig claimed to have incurred many household expenses with regard to the apartment. Givens claims that the amount given to her was a gift since they were in a relationship. Rosenzweig countered her claim by saying that he was married at that particular time, and he had kids.
Issue: Legal question raise on appeal
Rosenzweig said that the amount used to purchase the property was obtained from a loan, and they both were supposed to pay for it. Givens claimed that at the time the contract was signed, she was a student and could not be involved in such an act.
 
Rule: The answer to the legal question raised on appeal
The court dismissed the claims that Givens was unknowingly induced into the mortgage documents (Larkson, Miller, and Cross 293). The court said that at her age she understood the nature of transactions and hence she was required to participate in repaying the loan.
Rationale: The reasoning behind the rule.
Any contracts made by people aged above 18 years are binding, and the signing parties must take full responsibility for the contract requirements Read More