Legal Week 4 Discussion - Assignment Example

School: LEGAL WEEK 4 DISCUSSION Lecturer: LEGAL WEEK 4 DISCUSSION There is common saying that two heads are better than one. It should be based on such proverbial understanding that the issue of peer review exists in the health care sector as way of ensuring that peers in the delivery of health care share common ideas, knowledge, recommendations and professional critique (Bond and Bond, 2004). Dallon (2000) explained that is a complex system encompassing the review of medical staff members of the quality and effectiveness of service performed by colleague professionals.

The issue of the effectiveness of peer review in ensuring that quality health care is delivered continues to go on.Peer review can indeed be said to be an effective program within the health sector in achieving quality health care. This is because through peer review, there is a professional back up of the actual health care service that is delivered to service users (World Health Organization, 2011). This is to say that peer review makes it possible for there to be validity of professional medical outcomes, whereby the decisions and actions of medical staff members are subject to third party scrutiny to ensure that all forms of lapses are identified and corrected.

In such a situation, the patient or service user becomes the eventual benefactor, getting an assurance that there is always a back up for guaranteed health care.Peer review can also be said to be very effective in promoting peer learning. What this means is that through various peer review methods, professional medical staff are able to learn from their colleagues and peers through the corrections and critique they pass on them. Meanwhile, within the professional medical practice, continuous learning has been noted to be an important process that ensures that service providers are always equipped with the latest service standards to use in rendering quality service (Bond and Bond, 2004).

Meanwhile when the service provider is guaranteed to be of high quality, this can be translated into the quality of care (World Health Organization, 2011).ReferencesBond J. & Bond S. (2004). Sociology and Health Care. New York: Churchill Livingstone.Dallon C. W. (2000). Understanding judicial review of hospitals physician credentialing and peer review decisions. Temple Law Review, 596, 1World Health Organization (2011). Aging and life course: Our aging world. Geneva: United Press Limited