According to the concept of the Shareholder Wealth Maximisation, the main objective of the management of a firm, a company or any business enterprise is to maximise wealth for its shareholders. This concept has been the basis of the ancient and original theory of business functioning…
Download file to see previous pages...
While on the other hand CSR refers to the obligation that a business has towards the society for using it as resource. In this era of global business, maximisation of shareholder's wealth has frequently exposed violations to the responsibility that a business has towards the society. (Roe M.J., 2001)
The dawn of Globalization was characterised by reformative measures in economies, mobilization of funds and growth at unusual pace. After the initial precipitation it appeared that much had to be evaluated in terms of gains and losses as a whole. Accordingly, the concept of Shareholder's Wealth Maximisation has been critically evaluated by many and subsequently other theories have been developed. However, moving on to the other approaches a better understanding of the market conditionals is needed.
In business economies the markets are divided according to the structural variations. There are perfectly competitive markets which is the majority and there others such as the Monopoly, Monopolistic competitive markets and the Oligopoly markets. The shareholder maximising theory has created much stir in the perfectly competitive markets such as the U.S. The points are discussed in the later part of the study. However in a monopoly market the maximisation theory can be alarming. The shareholders in a monopoly market will try to maximise the profit by producing less and hiking price. The additional premium will be increasing the shareholder's wealth if primacy norms are higher. If, however, the primacy norms are weaker the above condition will enhance the Nation's wealth.
As the world is now a global village the differences in the different market no longer exists. Therefore everybody is more worried on the system and approaches to functioning rather than on the place. The instances of the bankruptcies, fraudulent practices, concentration of wealth has given rise to other schools of thought in the objective of a business.
An overlook at different economies will point out broad groups in the style of functioning. There are traditional and radical players, there are modern and flexible counterparts and there are nations who have mixed approaches to structural formation. For example countries like U.S. or U.K. are known for their shareholder wealth maximisation culture, on the other hand countries like Japan and Germany are known for their Stakeholder Maximisation concept. The shareholder maximisation theory rules that the managers of a firm will conduct fiduciary duties towards the maximising the investors in the firm. The Stakeholder Concept states that the managers' goal should not only be to maximize the shareholders' wealth but also take into consideration the stakeholders. The stakeholders of a firm are the employees, suppliers, customers and the local communities. (Allen F. & Zhao M., 2007)
The Stakeholder concept, popularized by R. Edward Freeman, gave the world an important aspect to think. The theory was powerful enough to change the structural framework of economics and law. The importance of capital always existed in the world of business but it undermined the contribution of other factors
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Shareholder Wealth Maximisation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1520395-shareholder-wealth-maximisation
(Shareholder Wealth Maximisation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Shareholder Wealth Maximisation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1520395-shareholder-wealth-maximisation.
Any credible explanation for increasing the wealth of shareholder and owners as the primary objective of management should, basically, be a moral one. The most credible explanation for increasing shareholder wealth was given by Milton Friedman. In essence, shareholders own the company because they own equity shares.
The escalating protests in Wall Street in the United States demonstrate growing public outrage against corporate greed and white-collared crimes. This paper will argue that instead of wealth generation for shareholders, the underlying principle that should inform decision-making processes of corporations should be the improvement of corporate governance and addressing elite deviance.
Innovative approaches to managing corporations were sought for these vital economic contributors to remain relevant. A number of options have been pursued, including entrepreneurship, flattening of hierarchies, downsizing, outsourcing and encouraging culture change in corporations.
As a part of corporate and management strategy; organisations tend to find alternatives creating more value by maximising shareholder wealth (King, Slotegraaf, Kesner, 2008 pp 24-45). The discussion aims at underpinning and analysing the role of mergers and acquisitions as a strategic mean of creating value and maximising shareholder wealth in comparison to the alternative organic growth.
"Shareholders" are legal persons (humans or corporations) that own a business. Ownership is derived by investing funds or assets, or buying stakes from previous owners. Shareholdings represent a limited legal claim on the ownership of a business, its assets and liabilities.
It should be noted that shareholders gain from their investments through accumulated earnings per share and dividend distributed by the business organisation. Externally, investor value is maximised through the increase in capital gains or the stock price.
The last word 'wealth' according to the dictionary means any resource that has some value in terms of utilization and trade. If the whole axiom is to be translated it would be 'to gain the highest achievable value for the owners of the company. Therefore in order to achieve this axiom, managers especially finance managers take decisions that are in accordance with this statement.
WACC is usually in most cases expressed as percentage in form of an interest rate, if a company works with a WACC of ten percent, it's usually interpreted that it cannot invest in projects or investments paying with returns less than that percentage. This can be in other words be the opportunity cost of capital, this is the cost on returns of investing capital in a company or else where.
Banks need to use financial management techniques in making investment and accepting new projects. Banking operations also account for major risks that bear capacity to affect a bank's cash flows, earnings and shareholder wealth. This emphasises the importance of risk management in the banking sector.
This paper will argue that instead of wealth generation for shareholders, the underlying principle that should inform decision-making processes of corporations should be the improvement of corporate governance and addressing elite deviance.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Shareholder Wealth Maximisation for FREE!