Disease Outbreaks and Food Poisoning - Coursework Example

A law was passed that ensures every piece of meat or poultry bared inspected for wholesomeness by the U.S. Department of Agriculture stamp. The following claims made, Nestle concluded that the government is responding fast in protecting people's lives from harmful bacteria. Moreover, since humans are at the top of the food chain, they are prone to many dangers associated with food poisoning (Nestle 11-30).

On the other hand, the government has not exhausted its operations in ensuring the protection of feed supply to animals bearing in mind that they are what people eat. Cattle and chicken feed on plant-based products that might contain harmful materials and are transferred to people’s bodies in the food chain. In addition, these animals are given drugs that question the safety of our food. Even with an effort of the federal government to call upon the inspection of animal feed producers, national food safety agencies have failed to maintain these regulations. How can we be sure of what we eat if the government does not protect our health? Nestle's ideas are more convincing because they make people aware of the dangers they expose themselves to while consuming meat, poultry and fish, especially where the source is unknown.

The omnivore’s delusion is also another problem pointed out by Nestle about what animals and poultry eat. Nestle calls for people to adopt crop farming because it increases nitrogen concentration in the air and acts as a good food source. When more people turn to crop production, prices of food in the market decrease and farmers struggle to produce the best quality products. Farmers also get advice on various ways to raise food depending on the market demands. Crop production, in a preferable manner, increases food safety, mainly when farmers use accepted chemicals. In addition, crops, especially beans, act as alternative protein sources, reducing reliance on meat and poultry. Moreover, the amount of nitrogen in the world cannot support the whole population calling upon people to adopt crop farming to ensure environmental sustainability (Hurst 6-7).

Nestle also uses rhetorical choices to persuade readers to care for their health. She has used demonstrations and animal logos to show how certain animal products are contaminated and unsuitable for human consumption. At some point, Nestle compares USDA-regulated and FDA-regulated products in terms of the safety of beef and poultry. The regulations offered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) are incredibly different, questioning the credibility of their actions in ensuring food safety (Nestle 56-60).