StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Should there be any specific limitations on the powers of the president - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
There has been a lot of debate recently and in the past concerning the limits of presidential powers and what American legislators can do to stem abuse of power by the president. Over the past 40 years, since the Nixon presidency, there has been renewed interest in presidential…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Should there be any specific limitations on the powers of the president
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Should there be any specific limitations on the powers of the president"

Module Should there be any Specific Limitations on the Powers of the President? INTRODUCTION There has been a lot of debate recently and in the past concerning the limits of presidential powers and what American legislators can do to stem abuse of power by the president. Over the past 40 years, since the Nixon presidency, there has been renewed interest in presidential powers, potential abuses and how best to limit them, if possible. According to most scholars, Congress is the biggest and probably only obstacle between the president and abuse of power.

In this paper, the writer will discuss the dynamics involved in presidential powers and argue whether there should be specific limits on presidential powers.Thesis Statement: There should be a specific limit on the powers of the president.DISCUSSION Americans hold consultations in high regard, and it is even required by the Constitution. Consultation, decision-making and deliberation are fundamental concepts in the Constitution, with frequent mentions of participation and collective approaches to situations.

Even the Constitution itself is the result of consultation among past leaders (Meter 102). Successive presidents have disregarded the need for greater consultation and acted without consulting Congress or the Senate. Limiting the president’s power should be a priority for the American public and Congress to prevent impunity from creeping into the presidency. More often than not, presidents get away with individual decisions that go against the consultative spirit of the Constitution (Meter 96).

WATERGATEThe Watergate scandal brought a halt to the “imperial presidency” and the concentration of presidential power. However, it appears that this halt was only temporary. In the wake of the scandal, Congress enacted multiple laws meant to change the political process. Revelations during the Watergate inquiry into money-laundering convinced Congress to allocate public financing of national elections, limits on private campaign donations and spending, public revelation of sources of financing, and to implement campaign finance regulations through an autonomous Federal Election Commission.

The Watergate scandal acted as an eye-opener for Congress, pushing it to do more to protect American people from power-hungry executives. The decision by Nixon to order wiretapping of Democratic Party headquarters symbolized to Congress and other legislators – the early indications of concentration of power and increasing abuse of power by presidents. Nixon clearly violated the law and ethical standards of the office of the president of the United States by ordering domestic espionage, which is illegal in the United States.

His impeachment and subsequent resignation were a watershed moment in the quest to limit presidential powers, and Watergate is an example of why presidential power should be limited. Watergate led to many attempts to curb presidential powers. For example, today, to make it simpler for the Department of Justice to probe crimes in the executive arm, Congress now requires that the attorney general appoint a special prosecutor to probe accusations of illegal activities by the executive. Congress also formed a Congressional Budget Office and explicitly barred a president from impounding funds without prior approval from Congress.

Congress also created more committee discussions and passed the Freedom of Information Act to allow the American public and media to request the declassification of state documents. KILLING OF AMERICAN CITIZENS AND HIT LISTSThe Constitution clearly forbids the president from ordering the killing of American citizens, especially on American soil. However, in 2010, the New York Times reported that President Obama had ordered the killing of an American cleric – Anwar al-Awlaki – for engaging in and encouraging terrorist activities in and against the United States (Shane 1).

According to the article, it is extremely rare – virtually unprecedented – for a president to approve an American for targeted killing (Shane 1). However, the president did. Reasons given for the move were that international law, which the US is subject to, allows the use of lethal force against persons or groups that pose a potential threat to a country. Proponents of the move also argued that Congress ratified the use of military force against Al Qaeda after 9/11, and this includes people cooperating with Al Qaeda.

Since people on the list are seen as military enemies of the state; they do not receive the protection of the ban on political assassinations that was first ratified by President Gerald Ford (Shane 1). However, this is just a way for the president to circumvent the law, which still outlaws the president from ordering the targeted killing of American citizens. This is another case of abuse of power. The case of hit list also applies in this case (Becker and Shane).CONCLUSION Congress has a responsibility to the American people to protect their interests and safeguard the country from being engulfed by vested interest.

The president’s office is honorable and should be respected, but it is not an absolute position (Meter 338). Imperial presidencies begin with personal decisions such as taking the country to war without consulting the right entities. There should be a specific limit on the powers of the president; especially concerning military activities. Works CitedBecker, Jo, and Scott Shane. "Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will." The New York Times. The New York Times, 28 May 2012. Web. 16 Nov. 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?emc=eta1&_r=0Meter, Larry A.

United States v. Nixon: The Question of Executive Privilege. New York: Chelsea House, 2007. Print.Shane, Scott. "U.S. Approves Targeted Killing of American Cleric." The New York Times. The New York Times, 6 Apr. 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Should there be any specific limitations on the powers of the Essay”, n.d.)
Should there be any specific limitations on the powers of the Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1664526-should-there-be-any-specific-limitations-on-the-powers-of-the-president
(Should There Be Any Specific Limitations on the Powers of the Essay)
Should There Be Any Specific Limitations on the Powers of the Essay. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1664526-should-there-be-any-specific-limitations-on-the-powers-of-the-president.
“Should There Be Any Specific Limitations on the Powers of the Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1664526-should-there-be-any-specific-limitations-on-the-powers-of-the-president.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Should there be any specific limitations on the powers of the president

The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty

Despite the absence of the fixed constitutional frames in the written form, which would limit the British Parliament' activity, it has long been admitted that it is impossible to take any political measures for limiting legislative or executive powers.... However, it is essential to note, that the British Parliament is now more limited in its rights not on the judicial, but on the political reasons, and the sphere in which it is not able to implement its unlimited powers is increasing....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Creating the Constitution

The limitations on the power given to each of the three branches of government are known as the system of checks and balance and it is precisely the limits on power, rather than the authority given, that oils the machinery of democratic progress.... Even today, in the atmosphere of an imperial President and lack of a strong legislative body, the idea that the president or Congress would actually engage in tyrannical methods seems far-fetched, but the framers of the Constitution who saw firsthand how absolute power could corrupt, it was truly a revolutionary leap forward....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Significance and Limitations of the Royal Prerogative

The following are some of the powers vested under the Royal Prerogative:  (1) Calling for and dissolving of the parliament, calling of elections; (2) Giving of royal assent to legislation; (3) Preparing plans to confer benefits to citizens; (4) Granting of clemency, pardoning of convicts, or reducing penalties thereof; (5) Entering into treaties, declaring war and making peace, controlling the issuance of passports and preventing foreigners from entering the country; (6) Controlling, organizing and disposing of the armed forces; (7) Appointing of judicial officers, ministers, and other public officers; (8) Procuring of ships; (9) Printing of authorized versions of the Holy Bible....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Importance Of Constitution And Bill Of Rights

By creating a system of checks and balances involving endowing the three branches of government with their own specific powers and lack thereof, the government of the United States possesses both the advantage of not putting too much power in the hands of a single individual, but it also has the effect of often grinding down the process of instituting change to a near-halt....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The US Health Care Reform Act - Federal Government Expectations, Central Government Powers

The US Constitution prevents the president, acting through Congress, from encroaching upon the sovereignty of the states and forces them to accept the health care reform law.... Despite strong opposition, the health care reform law was still passed due to the president's legislative power and influence.... rdquo; This power is limited, however, because 2/3 majority of the Congress can override the president's vetoes and still pass a bill he might be against....
2 Pages (500 words) Term Paper

Presidency/ executive branch revisited

The few vague paragraphs in the US Constitution specify the powers of the president.... That vagueness in the specifications of the powers of the Presidents provides the latent strength to the President to act.... It relates to the executive powers of the American President.... The minimalist approach to the president's job description is perhaps not due to the ignorance by the framers of the Constitution, but a deliberate act to let the president grab powers, when considered necessary to grab it in the interest of the Nation....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Powers Vested on the Central Government of the US

Based on the nature of the constitution and the provisions on the powers of the federal government, the American system has created a limited government scenario as the mandate of the federal government are limited by the fundamental constitutional provisions (Ginsberg, Lowi and Weir 47).... hellip; The nature of the distribution of powers in the US has created a limited constitution kind of government in which the powers of the national government are limited only to specific areas that are of national interest....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Presidential Powers of Iran and the United States

he nature of the distribution of powers in the country has created a limited constitution kind of government in which the powers of the national government are limited only to specific areas that are of national interest.... hellip; The supreme leader has the power to appoint and dismiss the judges, supreme commander of the Islamic revolutionary guard corps, and other positions without consultation with the legislature while the president of Iran is instead the deputy commander in chief and chairman of the military of the republic....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us