The Equality Among Religions - Essay Example

Faith Club Essay Suzanne thinks that faith is sometimes strengthened with doubt after all, faith is a belief in somethingthat is “unprovable.”  For someone who’s scientifically minded, like her, it’s a giant step to believe in something that you cannot find solid proof of. Suzanne was talking about an author (Pagels) who “called into question the holiness of Jesus, saying that only John calls Jesus the Child of God.  The additional gospel authors simply use the term ‘Messiah,’ which means ‘of God,’ and could refer to a prophet.” Suzanne further wrote, “I had found myself wanting to discard beliefs that wouldn’t please neither Priscilla nor Rayna.” Hereafter it illustrates how Suzanne discard her belief to please others, it was not an interfaith dialogue since she didn’t talk about things that may make others uncomfortable. Then Ranya, not surprisingly, complaints further. Complaints about Ramadan and not being able to fast in it because she was lonely. She only stops whining when she finds an Imam who allows her to carry out beliefs and rituals that have nothing to do with Islam. While Pricilla did believe that God in in all of them. The most Leonard Swindler’s “Dialogue Decalogue” which are important most in important for successful interfaith dialogue are first and Fourth commandment. The first commandment explains how the primary purpose of discussion is to study, that-is transformation and growth in the insight and appreciative of reality with the performance consequently. Slightly, the actual fact that I learn that my conversation partner believes "this" rather than "that" proportionally changes my attitude toward her; and a change in my attitude is a significant variation in me. We come into into conversation so that we can acquire, change, and develop, not so we can force transformation on the other, as individual despairs to do in debate a hope comprehended in inverse proportion to the frequency and ferocity with which debate is entered into. In addition, since in dialogue each partner comes with the intention of learning and fluctuating herself, ones partner in fact will also amend. Therefore the goal of debate, plus greatly more, is accomplished far more effectively by dialogue. The fourth commandment further explains how in interreligious, inter-ideological dialogue we must not compare our ideals with our mates repetition, nevertheless somewhat our mate’s ideals with our partners ideals, and our drill with our partners practice. In The Faith Club, these two commandments manifested in the Faith Dialog between Suzanne, Rayna and Pricilla when they were discussing about their religious views in different perspectives. Question two Belief about God. Judaism, Christian belief, and Islamic are monotheistic beliefs, majorly they believe that there is only solitary God. The Jew and Islamic beliefs critically stress the oneness and unity of God. The assertion of the cohesion of God by Christians is sometimes misinterpreted, because Christians believe there is the Holy Trinity the one God being triune. Nevertheless, this is not a rejection of monotheism but an affirmation of the complexity of the Godly Actuality. These religions believe that this God is the origin and source of all that be existent. God’s carefulness about the whole creation and desires the happiness of all. God is fair and is providing basic rules for our guidance so that we may be good together with virtuous, according to Gods intention. He is also merciful; by means of Gods grace we are given strength to be more like what we ought to be Gods Guidance: All three religions believe in Golden Rule: doing to others what we wish other people do unto us. These three religions stand-in modesty, moderation, and honest work. We are to submit ourselves to the willpower of the Soul Creator. All three religions closely link religion and ethics. Faith is to be manifested by showing concern for the well-being and self-esteem of others, in a life of amenity to others, and in peculiar and social moral behavior. The Future: No matter how difficult the past and present-day may be, the three religions are self-confident about the forthcoming. Wicked and misery cannot eventually triumph. God has provided a condition (or state of being) for which our three religions have unalike identities, on the other hand we settle on the tenure Heaven. This future will bring about Gods unchallenged rule; unconditional bliss for all who live with God. In regard to interfaith dialogue, I think it is more important to begin talking about the commonalities between traditions, or to begin by discussing the differences between them. Since a good deal of Jewish-Christian dialogue has occurred during the last sixty years. It has been fruitful not only in helping Christians and Jews understand each other more accurately and more fully, but in prompting Christians to rethink some aspects of their own religious tradition. Christians have come to appreciate aspects of the biblical tradition that they may have disregarded or underrated. They have also come to regret some misrepresentations of Jews and Judaism disseminated by Christians down through the centuries misrepresentations that have often had tragic penalties. The tenacity of Covenant’s Discussions, the Christians in Dialogue with Jews and Judaism is to summarize some of the results of sixty years of study and discussion. The biggest differences among the traditions is that as monotheistic religions, sharing common ancestors, belief in divinely given written scriptures, and common rituals and practices, such as regular prayer and charity; valuing pilgrimage and sharing many common holy places; promising that behavior will receive its proper rewards and punishments in the future, on earth and in an afterlife; balancing and integrating strands of mysticism, legalism, and pious devotion; the three religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam would appear to be naturally suited to co-existence and even to mutual reinforcement. Question Three St. Edward’s University has a lot of diversity when it emanates to race. There is existence of individuals from all over the world in St Edward’s University. Each societal class, politically aware beliefs, religion, and sexual orientation are in one way or another in representation. The student’s body is very accepting because you see everyone talking to everyone. I would describe St Edward’s University as pluralistic. This is because , St Edward’s University has a long history of commitment to diversity and societal justice, in harmony with Catholic social teachings emphasizing respect for social self-esteem of human beings, social equality, defense for the susceptible, stewardship, and the search for reality, where on earth that exploration might lead. These obligations, pronounced in the St. Edward’s Mission Statement, are most directly addressed in the Cultural Foundations structure of classes, devoted to helping students progress a balanced understanding of and appreciation for their own and other cultures. In order to help in encouraging pluralism at St. Edward’s University, the following equal opportunities Statements of Principle should be in place. First, discrimination on the basis of race, creed, culture, gender, academic ability, physical ability or social background is unacceptable in our school. Secondly, every person in school will contribute towards a happy and caring environment by showing respect for and appreciation of each other, as individuals. They should endeavor to educate, develop and prepare children for life, whatever their race, creed, culture, gender, academic ability, physical ability or social background. An equal opportunities philosophy will be practiced by all members of workforce. They should encourage the principles of fairness and justice for all through the education that we provide in our school. And lastly, we ensure that all pupils have equal access to the full range of educational opportunities provided by the school. Work Cited Idliby, Ranya, Suzanne Oliver, and Priscilla Warner. The faith club: a Muslim, a Christian, a Jew-- three women search for understanding. New York: Free Press, 2007. Print. Read More