Warfare Dependence: the Problem and Solution - Essay Example

Task Welfare Dependence Introduction Welfare dependence has been on a rising tendency recently in many countries where the effects of war are still presented. Most families in the countries entirely depend on the welfare relief aid in taking care of most indispensable needs, with the aid contributing the highest percentage of total income spending. The issues have brought up concerns in most countries having the problem and solution have been put across to fight the problem finally. Warfare dependence can be attributed to many reasons as to why families pick up this answer as the excellent solution for their problems. The matter has various indicators which may be similar for different countries around the globe. Welfare dependence has been caused by various factors in dissimilar nations, and consequently, intervention has been on the rise to address the matter. Causes of Welfare Dependence Similar to poverty, welfare dependence can be considered a scale that has different variations in scope and intermission (Kendall 2). Different families are considered dependent even in instances where they may dependent partly or entirely on the welfare programs. The resources may be larger or smaller in totality, as compared to derived incomes from these programs. The extent of dependence of families on the welfare programs can be assessed simply through the amount of times that families partly or entirely depend on these programs. The results from these evaluations can be utilized in the future for policy developments. Certain parameters have to be fixed for proper assessment of the dependence levels for dissimilar countries, similarly to the case of the poverty level measurement (Douglas 3). Welfare reliance has at the recent time been profoundly attributed to alcohol and drug misuse. The findings have emerged through research on examining the close linkage between these two different elements. However, it is not certain that the people dependent on welfare will any time soon leave the schemes in order to engage in job opportunities, even with the previous debates concentrating more on explaining the matter in terms of employment competence and human resources (Schmidt et al 221). The notion that rose from the United States concerning provisions of wellbeing assistance has significantly affected the recipients of these benefits. The notion was that the recipients of welfare assistance would in some way stop being dependent and seek out employment in an attempt to triumph over their problems. However, over several years since the implementation of these programs, the assistance programs recurrently conceived to the fact that it only aims at weakening the determination of recipients. The notion made the government remain reluctant on the provision of support, therefore, providing restrictions to the groups obtaining the assistance. In the initial years of establishment, only a small group made it into being regarded as poor. With the Great Depression, the situation changed drastically, and more people were taken as underprivileged by the program. The program now aimed at assisting not only the deserving poor but also the poor within the societal context. The inclusion of a bigger group in the society transpired due to escalation in terms of unemployment and poverty levels. The claim that single mothers having children are reliant on welfare has turned out to be just a different manner of exclaiming that they are evading vocation. Compassionate critics have commented that work enticements built into welfare agendas have never been triumphant principally because persons have been positioned in low-wage occupations that do not develop expertise and present inadequate earnings to sustain a family. Consequently, a job cannot present an uncomplicated way out from welfare reliance for all women. However, the subject has brought substantial concerns in countries that had managed to implement these programs to help the poor. The subject has led to development of arguments concerning the principal reason as to why more people have continued to turn into the welfare program, as well as the views of the people who work to provide to the welfare budget. The welfare budgets have been on high up, with the reason for the rise being the augment in the beneficiaries of the programs. The life on the welfare program has been becoming more and more comforting for the so-called beneficiaries. However, the populaces who provide these funds continue to suffer in their work environments. Interventions In some nations, various restructurings have been employed in an attempt to trim down the massive spending on welfare assistance programs. Other countries have started to work on the development of the system that has no much encouragement on inclusion of people who may just enter into the program to bear the benefits. In Britain, the welfare rolls are not just awarded to any other person even with claims of being single mothers (Field 18). The system has more emphasis on the provision of welfare roles for the people of working age, than for retired people (Henman and Perry 5). The country has developed welfare rolls on the conditional requirement of seeking for a job. The welfare has transformed over time and led to the domination of the program by the working age from the former, retired claimants (Field 18). The transformation has led to fall of the job market for the skillful and semi-skilled people within the society. Most people still argue that the welfare programs are responsible for the poverty sequences and the predisposition of the underprivileged to remain reluctant on alleviation of their problems. Many citizens, including politicians, have argued for the same in an attempt to make the government aware that the program worsens the position for the underprivileged citizens. According to the people supporting the claim, the administration only provides incentives to the poor through the program only to make them continue being poor in order to continue receiving the incentives. Further to that, the programs have also discouraged marriage, as well as working (Duncan et al 467). This is because once a person gets a job, the earnings from the program are reduced by a substantial amount and the same applies to case someone gets married. Reflection In my opinion, the program has enormously added up to the poverty levels in countries that have implemented this system, since people have no drive. The people become reluctant to undertake any jobs to maintain their share intact. They, therefore, avoid any activities that may compromise their ability to receive intact welfare shares. The changes in the structure of how the funds were distributed show a lot of improvement on the deficiency level reductions, meaning that provision of smaller amount of the assistance may seek to motivate the populace to work better. The dependence on the welfare funds has to be carried in a manner that specifies the groups that have to receive the incentives to prevent the younger generations from coming up with strategies to stay in the program by avoiding work and marriage (Duncan et al 467). The government has to realize the truth behind the whole program and come up with apposite measures to guarantee that only the needy receive these incentives. The program can in some way be converted into a mutual benefit program where the program provides job opportunities for recipients after some time in the program. Taking this measure may serve to ensure that the group gets involved with nation building, as well as self-developments in terms of gaining skills. The program may help considerably help to eliminate the problem of poverty cycles, since the recipients have the motivation required to bear irreproachable results. The welfare recipients also may start having the brains of implementation of developments, and establishing business enterprises in their areas of residence through the skills gained in the mutual work programs. Conclusion Provided with the various ways that led to the development the welfare program together with the prevailing situation on the matter, one can possibility suggest a way of dealing with the government. While some nations have been on the verge of tackling the formidable challenge, other governments have been reluctant, pretending not to see the implication of provision of incentives to people who have the capability but have no intentions of working to keep their incentive share (Duncan et al 467). The only thing that we will expect is that the government will take a better action towards alleviating the problem. Alleviating the problem will serve to make life enhanced for the recipients and their children in the future, as well as help in the removal of the rooted vice of poverty. Works Cited Douglas, Sarah. Introduction and Overview. May 9, 2007. Web. Dec 13, 2011. Available at < http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators07/ch1.pdf> Duncan, Greg J. et al. Welfare Dependence Within and Across Generations. Dec 12, 2011. Web. Dec 13, 2011. Available at: < http://www.sciencemag.org/content/239/4839/467.full.pdf> Field, Frank. “Welfare dependency and economic opportunity”. Family Matters. Vol. 54 Spring/Summer 1999: 18-23. Print. Henman, Paul and Perry, Julia. “Welfare Dependency? A Critical Analysis of Changes in Welfare Recipient Numbers”:Australian Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 37, 2002. Print. Schmidt, Laura. “Addiction and Welfare Dependency: Interpreting the Connection”. Social Problems. Vol. 49, No. 2 (May 2002): 221-241. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2002.49.2.221. Swenson, Kendall. Indicators of Welfare Dependence. Sep 19. 2009. Web. Dec 13, 2011. Available at < http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators07/rb.pdf > Read More