StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis of Crito Dialogues by Plato - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Analysis of Crito Dialogues by Plato" paper argues that significance and modern implementation may be seen easily. Modern society lacks ethical decisions and just laws. There are laws for common people – which appear to be not that strict laws for higher officials. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
Analysis of Crito Dialogues by Plato
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis of Crito Dialogues by Plato"

Crito There were always contradictory issues tat were not easy to resolve and to discuss. Speaking on ethical issues, theyusually involve some kind of a confrontation of opposing interests. When the parties opinions and decisions come into a conflict, there are always options that determine the outcomes. Ethical dilemmas are based on the consideration of what moral just is. In Crito Socrates has a conversation with his fried Crito who intends to take him away of death; he makes attempts to persuade him to leave the prison and to save himself. Socrates backs his denial with a multitude of sound questions so that Crito realizes the presuppositions that have lead Socrates to such kind of the decision. Socrates says: “Tell me, then, whether you agree and assent to me first principle, that neither injury nor retaliation, nor warding off evil by evil is ever right.” Socrates says that doing unjust is never appropriate – even repaying for some abusive acts. Man has always act just; never can he do evil, even suffering does not permit to act evil and unjust. The major premise is that man ought never act unjustly. The second is that man has an obligation to abide by the judgments of the state and not to seek individual exceptions to the law. That is why Socrates decides to abide the state and not to escape to save himself. I support his perspective, as if everyone acted like that, the world would be much better. Objection. Regarding the first premise that states that man ought never act unjustly, people may oppose such statement as there are many unfair cases, in which, they believe, they can respond evil with another evil. Or a greater one. History traces many lines when power and violence decided the way the world developed; there are achievements built on blood and bones (for example, the Great Wall), deceptions solved the wars – yet they began them widely. Even some sacred Hindu texts say it is just to revenge. People often think being kind is not beneficial; somebody may use it for own profit. Being clever and strategic is more valued nowadays. It does not mean people are evil; just they observe always the possibility some other people may deceive or betray them. In case they face injustice and evil, they often think that it is appropriate and permitted to act accordingly – evil and unjust. They may believe such behaviors would put an end to misbehavior. But actually, usually such approach enhance evil and hatred and raise the gap that emphasizes the conflict between just and unjust, good and evil. Replay. I support Socrates perspective as I believe there are two approaches that are different in their core. One is about being a consequence, while another is being a reason. First means that person is consciously or (more often) unconsciously reacts accordingly to the situation provided. They accept no responsibility or even usually do not consider the consequence their actions will lead to. They might believe that if they were abused, they have the whole right to act accordingly – which often leads to ruination. It does not lead to any good. I cannot say they is no way ruination can be needed – it is required really sometimes as it provides place for new. But actually, being conscious on the outcomes the action imposes means regulating own behavior accordingly to the free will – moral aspect, not reactive emotional reactions or egoistic persuasions. Acting just imposes also not repaying injustice with injustice, evil with evil – even when they cause severe suffering it is not the case; also carrying out just deeds and agreements. Regarding the second premise oblection, people may say that when the laws are unjust, there is no need to adhere them. They may harm own interests but support the states ones. There are wise rulers, yet there are unjust rulers – greedy or egoistic. People, seeing injustice try to circumvent the law to support own right and benefits – when the state is evidently not follows the same goal. Nowadays the initial goal of the state is to enable joint development for the greater good for everyone. Thus, state serves its people – even though exploiting them. But widely the top only has access to better life conditions. They define the decisions and development that takes place. People may be angry and do nothing – yet they may confront or circumvent some aspects of currently available law to secure own rights and life. Replay for this objection I would start with the point that even the law was not fair, people have to abide them. Thus it is evident that law, which must be adhered by all, has to be universal and applicable to everyone – this is inevitable condition for the state to survive. In case it cannot cover all the issues, it cannot be acknowledged as universal. Retaliating against the state harms the state and thus is doing evil to the state. Individual exceptions to the laws harm and undermine the states authority. Each individual makes an agreement with the state to abide by its judgments. Thus, such agreement is a just mutual transaction of giving and taking. Doing evil to the state even when the state does evil to a person ought not to be done. Searching for individual exceptions is not just. Refusal to abide by the judgments imposed by the state is equal to breaking a just agreement. All has to be made based on agreements – ruining them is unjust. Agreement means an obligation to adhere to the agreed norms and laws. Socrates supports ethically right choices – even if they lead to own death. Behind this his answer many doctrines and perspectives might be attached. For example, Utilitarianism that states that in case the outcomes lead to the greater good for the greater amounts of people, such deed is ethically right. Socrates himself could not betray own views. There is always a conflict of interests within any type of the conflict. They usually may be of different scale. Sometimes it is a conflict of the two peoples interests; sometimes it is a fight of a human and the larger system – as state. Even more, personal interests may confront with the higher level ideas – like ethical aspects that concern more the soul. Can a human be after betrayal of own core essential values? The priorities have to be set accordingly. Significance and modern implementation may be seen easily. Modern society lacks ethical decisions and just laws. There are laws for common people – which appear to be not that strict laws for higher officials, for examples. Law implies there is no exceptions. It is not just that political figures have power not to rule to increase prosperity of the state but to fulfill own welfare. Also, searching for the ways to outflank the law leads to the matter laws become stricter. For example, when some people illegally hide their profits and avoid paying taxes, government may increase taxes for those who pay them. It becomes even more unjust. I think every person has to start with own responsibility. I acknowledge it is difficult, yet always hardly possible to change the world and its order. In case consistent changes would take place, it would definitely enhance the society and existing order. In case laws would be revised and provide fair and just agreements, people would more gladly accept and adhere them. Less the intend to decline the law, the better the state may be. Thus, summing up, understanding the underlying reasons and abiding the law will help to improve the existing system. References “Crito,” The Dialogues of Plato, trans. B. Jowett, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. (1871). New York: Random House. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Crito Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Crito Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1695675-crito
(Crito Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Crito Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1695675-crito.
“Crito Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1695675-crito.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis of Crito Dialogues by Plato

What Is Justice For Socrates And Augustine Who (Or What) Is The Highest Authority To Judge

As a consequence he produced no written works of his philosophy; however, his student plato produced many written dialogues of Socrates' philosophy.... plato was a student of Socrates from a young age and wrote many dialogues based on the philosophy that he learned.... In the years surrounding 380 BC plato established a school which forwarded education with focuses on math, music, athletics, philosophy and sciences.... Beyond plato, the only other writer who recorded the philosophy of Socrates was Xenophon; however he did not always portray Socrates philosophically....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Philosophy: Socrates Dialogues

plato employs the method of dialectic and discusses within a scope of ethics (plato and Cooper 1).... This displays the foundation of wisdom as a meek acceptance of our lack of knowledge (plato and Cooper 20).... The most essential element that Socrates portrays is the immortality of an individual's soul (plato and Cooper 55).... Name: Task: Instructor: Date: Socrates dialogues Socrates meets Euthyphro at the courts where he tells Euthyphro that he has been indicted for disrespecting the gods and misleading youths....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Interpretation of Speech by Socrates: The Apology of Plato

Apology by plato is an It is believed that the words by Socrates were not recorded when he was speaking, but with the detailing of dialogues it is sure that Plato was present during the time of trial.... It is also possible that Socrates' defensive speech might be much stronger than reported by plato.... This term paper "Interpretation of Speech by Socrates: The Apology of plato" is about the statement in which Socrates explains the manner of his speaking....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Sophists and Socrates

This paper ''Sophists and Socrates'' tells that The second period of the Greek philosophy covering V and VI centuries up to X one, as opposed to the unilateral direction of previous philosophy, begins also unilaterally, namely it begins with the statement of anthropological problems.... ... ... ... The political life started to develop in the Greek republics has put forward new interests, much closer to an individual....
24 Pages (6000 words) Essay

Apology versus Crito

plato's Socrates in the “Apology” declares that he would continue to philosophize even if the court ordered him not to, as he does not believe that one must obey the laws of the state.... On the contrary his opinion directly conflicts with the passage from “crito” where Socrates chooses to obey the states laws and refuses to escape from an unjust conviction.... Apology versus crito ...
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Text and traditions'Portfolio task' :

However, the analysis of his decisions, reasoning, and motives shows that it is his behaviour and choices that led to his misery.... In fact, the examples taken from philosophical studies and literature of Ancient Greece, which is believed to be the cradle of civilization, show that it is free will, the acts of autonomy that The stories described by Sophocles and plato about Oedipus, the literary character, and Socrates, one of the founders of Western philosophy, prove the above-mentioned....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Socrates about Wisdom

Its task is to justify the need to search for the truth that is possible using dialogue as a comparison and analysis of the various points of view.... His teachings and ideas of wisdom can be found in the treatises of his pupil plato, in which Socrates is the protagonist.... Based on the study of plato's dialogue called Apology, it can be argued that Socrates understands wisdom primarily as ethical knowledge.... onsidering wisdom, Socrates argues that the first step to wisdom involves ignorance (plato 26)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Story and Analysis of Plato's Apology

The paper analyses philosophical areas linked with the teachings of Socrates in Apology, a particular dialogue in Ancient Greece penned by plato.... The author of this paper "The Story and analysis of Plato's Apology" discusses the concepts of philology such as Axiology, Epistemology, and Ontology.... In a similar regard, epistemology is a particular domain of study that deals with the analysis of knowledge to comprehend human behavior....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us