StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Deciding Right from Wrong - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Deciding Right from Wrong" briefly analyses the rights and wrongs with the help of some ethical theories formulated by some eminent scholars and philosophers. Since the evolutions of the human being on earth, the history of the right and wrong started…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.7% of users find it useful
Deciding Right from Wrong
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Deciding Right from Wrong"

? Deciding Right from Wrong Larry Stewart Regis Ethics in Information Technology MCSI 610 Deciding Right from Wrong Since the evolutions of the human being on earth, the history of the right and wrong started. Bible says that, the first human Adam committed a wrong thing when he ate a fruit which was denied to him by God. Adam committed the first sin or wrong thing under the influence of evil forces. In other words, evil forces were there even before the creation of the first human Adam. Since the first sin committed by Adam, the segregation of the right thing from the wrong thing has started in the world. However, even after thousands of years, we are still unable to make universal principles with respect to rights and wrongs. The rights of some people are the wrongs of the other people. For example, keeping more than one wife is a sin or a wrong thing for Christians whereas Muslims find nothing wrong in it. Based on individual perceptions, many scholars and philosophers tried to segregate between the rights and wrongs with the help of some ethical theories. This paper briefly analyses the rights and wrongs with the help of some ethical theories formulated by some eminent scholars and philosophers. “The concepts of ethics fall into two main categories; notions having to do with morality, virtue, rationality, and other ideals or standards of conduct and motivation; notions pertaining to human good or well-being and the "good life" generally” (Slote, n.d, p.2). Killing of enemies in a war is perceived as a right thing even though killing of innocent people are perceived as a wrong thing. Moreover, capital punishment is accepted as a morally right thing by many countries whereas some other countries reject capital punishment, purely on moral grounds. In other words, some people believe that killing of an antisocial element is good for the rest of the people in the society and hence such killing should be made legal, considering the future wellbeing of the other people. Most of the countries give capital punishments to terrorists because of the above notion. However, some people are of the view that taking the life of another person cannot be justified under any circumstances because of the immense value associated with human life. In their opinion, we are only creations and only the creator has the authority to make any modifications on our lives. Moreover, killing of criminals will deny them the opportunity to correct themselves. Some of the Muslims have the belief that killing of enemies of their religion is a sacred act. In short, killing of people is justified under some circumstances by some people whereas others object it under any circumstances. In other words, moral theories associated with killing of other people are widely differing in different places. “The categorical imperative of Immanuel Kant, tells us that we may not use or mistreat other people as a means either to our own happiness or to that of other people” (Slote, n.d, p.2). Moreover, Kant argued that "Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law"(Categorical Imperative, n.d). Kant believed that the moral principles were applicable universally. In his opinion, it is impossible to have a moral principle right at some places and wrong at other places. Nobody knows from where we come and where we go after death. As per Kantian theory, human being has a special role in the creations and hence moral principles with respect to human cannot be applied to other living things. However Kant strongly criticized the segregation of good and evil based on the personal beliefs or the religious beliefs. In his opinion,"Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end”(Categorical Imperative, n. d.) “Utilitarian consequentialists regard pleasure or the satisfaction of desire as the sole, intrinsic human good, and pain or dissatisfaction as the sole, intrinsic evil or ill, and they conceive our moral obligations as grounded entirely in considerations of pleasure and pain” (Slote, n.d, p.3). Utilitarian always analyses things based the utility of the outcome. They believe that the moral validity of an action is determined by the outcome of the action. In other words, capital punishment can be justified under utilitarianism since such a punishment will give Earlier in the twentieth century, ethics, veered away from its past in the direction of metaethics because of the influence of logical positivism. “The positivists held up experimentally verifiable science as the paradigm of cognitively meaningful discourse and claimed that any statement that was not empirically confirmable or mathematically demonstrable lacked real content” (Slote, n.d, p.6). However, the theories of metaethcis are also not free from controversies. “In cases where one's telling a single lie will prevent three others from telling lies, one will not decide what to do by simple arithmetic” (Solomon, 1995,p.10). Most of the modern scientific discoveries have proved beyond doubt that the things we learned about this universe are very small compared to the things which were unknown to us. Earlier, science believed that earth remains stationary and the sun rotates around earth. Later science revised the above theory and argued that sun remains stationary and the earth is rotating around the sun. Now science again modified that theory and argued that both sun and earth are rotating and nothing is remaining stationary. What is next?. .. In short, most of the scientific theories about this universe is undergoing changes periodically and we cannot rely on such changing theories to segregate between the rights and the wrongs. “Virtue theories seem to be attractive within bioethics because of the analogies between the notion of health and overall biological fitness and the general notion of human flourishing that lies at the heart of virtue theories” (Solomon, 1995, p.17). Conclusions The segregation of rights from wrongs is a complex task because of the complex parameters associated with the human actions. Since man is a social animal, all our actions will affect others as well. Our right actions may affect other wrongly. In other words, it is not necessary that our rights might be perceived in the same manner by others. In my opinion, an action which brings good to the individual and the rest of the society can be treated as right whereas actions which results in mixed outcomes should be treated as wrong. References 1. Categorical Imperative (n. d.), Retrieved from http://hercules.gcsu.edu/~hedmonds/lecture%20notes/kant%20lecture%20notes.htm 2. Slote M.A. (n.d.). Task of ethics, Retrieved from 3. Solomon W.D. (1995). Normative Ethical Theories, Retrieved from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Deciding Right from Wrong Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words, n.d.)
Deciding Right from Wrong Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1405690-deciding-right-from-wrong
(Deciding Right from Wrong Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Deciding Right from Wrong Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1405690-deciding-right-from-wrong.
“Deciding Right from Wrong Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1405690-deciding-right-from-wrong.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Deciding Right from Wrong

Defining Law, Ronald Dworkin

Legal formalism embraced the concept that a judge's decision, or holding, would always logically follow from the legal rule being applied to a particular set of facts, leaving little or no room for interpretation (Himma, 2006).... According to Dworkin, judges should look to the "political structure of their community" when deciding hard cases by, first, ensuring that their interpretation is in accordance with the community's existing legal practices, and, second, that the interpretation is presented in the best moral light (1982)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge

The withdrawing of the sea from the coast only reminds him of the ignorance of people and their diminishing faith in god.... An author of the essay "An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge" claims that 'belief' is the extent to which we think is the truth and 'truth' is the extent to which things really are....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Utilitarianism and Individual Rights and Justice

Actions are moral if they promote general happiness, and they are wrong if they will reduce general happiness.... Utilitarianism values happiness or utility, which is defined as “pleasure and freedom from pain.... Higher pleasures pertain to pleasure from activities that exercise the intellect, feelings, imagination, moral sentiments, and other essential moral values.... Among several actions, the right action promotes The assumptions of utilitarianism are: 1) Human well-being is a common good; 2) Everyone should be included in the assessment of utility; and 3) The right actions promote what is good for society....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

What Is Right and What Is Wrong

The essay “What Is Right and What Is wrong” focuses on a large question that involves ethics.... Deciding what decision is right and what is wrong determines the outcome.... rdquo; Who determines what should be right and what should be wrong.... These decisions are faced every day and what is right and what is wrong, depends on who will benefit more.... If the decision is made to either cancel or continue the services to keep another, this will stop 100,000 families from receiving food....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Major Issues on the Purpose of Business

The companies should have used different consumers from parts of the world or nation to obtain information.... Retrieved October 2012, from http://hbr.... Retrieved October 2012, from http://hbr.... Through right positioning, it was able to revive its declining profits (Mullins & Walker, 2009).... Companies encounter decisions which involve deciding which consumers have a positive customer lifetime value and are… Businesses do so by producing goods and services that meet the requirements of people or the customers....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Deciding what is wrong and Right

This paper, Deciding what is wrong and Right, stresses that Ethics entails the level of right things and wrong that humans ought to do.... Therefore, ethics has to do with the feelings that tell one what is right and what is wrong.... Scholars like Aristotle, Plato, Kant, and Mill touches on the right or the wrong act as understood in ethics.... Aristotle argues that for our actions to be moral or immoral, right or wrong, we must have a certain level of health and wealth....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Human Rights and Natural Law Theory

In the nineteenth century, human beings were not recognized under international law; their rights were derived from the rights of states.... The writer of this essay "Human Rights and Natural Law Theory" aims to investigate whether there are contradictions between human rights and natural law theory....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Desiring Canada: CBC Contests, Hockey Violence and Other Stately Pleasures

Other than employing direct force to ensure the citizens abide by what the state feels is right for its own benefit as opposed to the good of the citizens, states ensure application of hidden means to ensure attainment of such agenda.... This research will begin with the statement that an earlier statement by Pierre Trudeau in the late sixties became famous owing to its attribution that there lacks a particular place for the state inside the nation's bedroom seems a performative contradiction....
9 Pages (2250 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us