StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Kant and Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Kant and Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism" states that generally, the bone of contention between empiricism and rationalism occurs within an epistemology that is involved in the limits of knowledge, studying nature and sources. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Kant and Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Kant and Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism"

Kant believed that despite empiricists and rationalists following different paths, they all arrived at a similar skeptical dead end. Evidently, the rationalists had disregarded perception as utterly confused thinking that consequently rendered their theories as mere speculation, impossible of verification or refute. On the other hand, empiricists who theorized that people have access to the actual world in a perceptive sense believed that what people perceive are ideas that manifest in persons through things outside of them. For example, ideas are manifestations of impressions. Consequently, individuals only know their own ideas (Lawhead, pp. 123)

 According to Kant, he believes that people have access only to appearances. This does not imply access to illusory appearances. However, Kant believes that appearances provide people with the foundation of knowledge. Moreover, the mind contributes to experience due to understanding and the constituent pure categories. Moreover, an active role is played by the mind as well as its ability to superimpose experience on specific categories that result in knowledge. Kant further argues that people cannot know the ‘thing in itself. To this end, he goes beyond implying the inaccessibility of ‘reality.’ Over and above this, he implies it is impossible to experience anything beyond the function of the mind.

Moreover, it justifies how people acquire knowledge. The basic difference between ‘extension’ and ‘mind’ contributes to the problem as well backtracked to Descartes. The immaterial nature of the mind rouses the challenge of bridging the disconnect between the outside world and the inner mind. Hume believes that the mind is basically passive while Descartes believes that it aids in intellectual acts.

On the other hand, Kant simulates between empiricism and rationalism. Foremost, he supports Hume by stating that knowledge is impossible without experience. Secondly, he agrees with rationalists by stating that the mind plays a vital part in knowledge. On the contrary, Kant criticizes the rationalists such as Wolff and Leibniz for their illegitimate use of specific metaphysical notions. Kant is highly critical of the pretensions of the reason that cannot be proven. He equally criticizes the skepticism evident in Hume’s empiricism. To this end, he rejects Hume’s subservient role of reason (Lawhead, pp. 129)

Kant’s philosophy is not specific to the problem of whether people are aware of things in themselves. However, his philosophy is a haunting memory to all contemporary philosophy that adheres to a stringent mind-to-body dualism. Kant successfully addresses part of the contentious issues in the empiricism and rationalism debate. However, the contentious issue on how to restore the mind and its immediate and direct connection to the world is not sufficiently addressed up to the point of Husserl’s phenomenology.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1615702-kant
(Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1)
Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1615702-kant.
“Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1615702-kant.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Kant and Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism

Does Kant Adequatly Address the Problems Evident in the Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism

Name: Professor: Course: Date: Does Kant adequately address the problems evident in the controversy between empiricism and rationalism?... According to Ann (1970), conventionally there are two types of Epistemology: rationalism and empiricism.... rationalism on one hand explains that we gain knowledge through reasoning, while on the other hand, empiricism explains that we gain knowledge through sensory experience.... According to Kant, the difference (dispute) that emerges between rationalism and empiricism is the level in which we are dependent on sense experience in order for us to gain and acquire knowledge....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Rationalism (Rene Descartes) and Empiricism (David Hume)

While the major proponent for rationalism is Rene Descartes, the major proponent of empiricism is David Hume.... Lacey states that rationalism is “any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.... Like all things, there are extremes in rationalism.... Unlike rationalism which states that most truths and ideas can be attained mainly through reason, empiricism states that all ideas, knowledge and truths can be attained through experience and what can be sensed by using human senses....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Difference between rationalism and empiricism

The essay entitled "Difference between rationalism and empiricism" provides the information concerning the concepts of rationalism and empiricism.... It is stated that the epistemological philosophical theories of rationalism and empiricism can be traced to be of Greek origin.... rationalism differentiates between an empirical knowledge and prior knowledge.... rationalism is a philosophy which concentrates only on logic and empirical observations....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Rationalism and Empiricism: Differences and Successes

According to Searle, Pinker claims that there are two aspects to the debate between empiricism and rationalism.... The debate between rationalism and empiricism is still raging and has not ended.... teven Pinker and John Searle (2002) had an argument on words and rules and had involved rationalism and empiricism.... It is about the psychological side that Pinker claims, "The past tense is the only case I know in which two great systems of Western thought (rationalism and empiricism) may be tested and compared on a single rich set of data, just like ordinary scientific hypotheses....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

I Think, Therefore I Kant

Kant remained sympathetic to empiricism and suggested the duality of reason and knowledge as two separate spheres of endeavor.... Kant was also able to plot a course of philosophy toward rationalism and away from empiricism.... A close examination of Kant's ethical theory reveals why it drew such controversy and why it continues to persist.... This essay talks about the revolutionizing thinking and individual uniqueness of the works of Immanuel kant whose philosophy of reason still resonates in the Western world....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Hume: Empiricist or Empiricisms Greatest Critic

Pragmatism [that claims that 'knowledge' and 'truth' and 'foundations' are diversions and that we simply need to produce a theory that works] and rationalism (that claims there are innate [non-empirical] faculties of the reason that constitute the foundations of theoretical and empirical knowledge] are viewpoints latent but not central to Hume's analysis of 'Empiricism' expounded in his Treatise on Human Nature and The Enquiries.... From the paper "Hume: Empiricist or empiricism's Greatest Critic?...
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Varieties of Judgment in the Critique of Pure Reason

However, in The Critique of Pure Reason, Kant makes another distinction between synthetic and analytic judgments.... n this theme, Kant begins by supposing that both Hume and Leibniz had not properly between the two distinct forms of judgment and that, in fact, they had made only one distinction, which was the difference between uninformative truths on the basis of pure reason and factual matters on the basis of sensory experience (Kant 37).... In the paper 'Varieties of Judgment in the Critique of Pure Reason,' the author focuses on kant'scentral themes contained in The Critique of Pure Reason....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Does Kant Adequately Address the Problems Evident in the Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism

As the paper outlines, emerges between rationalism and empiricism is the level in which we are dependent on sense experience in order for us to gain and acquire knowledge.... Nonetheless, for kant, appearances can, and in fact, do provide us with the ground for knowledge on facts and ideas.... This is the concept, according to kant, the concept of purity of categories.... In this case when kant says that we cannot know the thing in itself he does not only mean that reality is inaccessible but also that we cannot experience anything outside in the way human mind operates Ann....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us