Health Information System - Case Study Example

Health Information System Name Institution Date of submission Introduction A health information system (HIS) is not a fixed entity bar a process via which health correlated data are collected, analyzed, shared, and utilized for decision making data is changed into knowledge for an action. These values also apply to all countries, despite the level of income and amount of complexity of the health system. In Australia there is a huge interdependence amid information systems in other division or sectors and health information systems. The areas or domains of concentration that a HIS (health information system) that Australia government has to address are be categorized into four main categories or types. The categories comprise health determinants, which include environmental, socioeconomic, behavioral, and genetic factors and the appropriate environments in which the health system will operate (Soto, 2011). In health system, it includes inputs the processes and structures of the health system strategy and institute, health infrastructure counting human, facilities, and financial resources. On health, system outputs it comprises the use, quality, and accessibility of services and health information. On health outcomes, it incorporates morbidity, mortality, health status, and disease outbreaks (AbouZahr, 2012). Status of Australia’s health information system The National Health Performance Framework (NHPF), which was initially developed in 2001 and was later, revised in 2009. The key function of the NHPF is to give a strategy for reporting on the performance or act of the Australian health system at a national level. The structure may also be utilized as a guiding strategy when rising sets of performance pointers for more distinct mechanism of the health system, for instance a specific target group, or a particular program. According to NHPF, there has been success and challenges faced by health information system in Australia (Andersen, 2001). Amid June 2008 as well as June 2013, the health data Systems had different constituents focusing on specific mechanism of the health organization, but collectively on condition that a substantial organization of knowledge for speeding up health system intensification (Campbell & Heywood, 2012). A health information system ought to create information for diverse uses with dissimilar health system actors. A number of these actors function at universal decision level (for instance, tactical planning, allotment of resources, and appraisal) whilst others function at micro-management point (for instance, programme management, case management, administration, and employment of human resources) Information linked to the performance or act of health services, to the administration of resources for health, and to the legal and policy structure pertinent to health are also largely created via the health sector. Information concerning the distribution, quantity, reach and eminence of health data and service stipulation, on the resources required to offer those services, and on the utilization of services and information by the populace can be created through custom HMIS (health management information systems). Massive data-information overload Among major administrative predicament, facing the Australian nationwide health care organization is the necessity to reform practices linked with massive information overwork. The current classification is burdened with large paperwork administrative forms, client record files, transfer notes and other labor-intensive methods of data classification (WHO, 2011). An integrated computerized data system may be apparent as a good-looking solution to such trouble. However, automation must not be viewed as a panacea with the likelihood of exacerbating data overload and emphasizing privacy concerns. Recent study in Australia and the United states indicate a supposed causal link connecting computers and privacy raid. Any moves in the direction of a national health data system must oppose this perception in the course of national level education system of affected parties as well as micro-level ways such as the development of hospital privacy employees. Such worry may be seen as a subset of the larger privacy debate, as well as information policy expansion should deal with such deliberation to develop strategy to prevent unauthorized right of entry to personal information as well as to keep away from the removal and sale of insightful health data (Henningfeld, 2009). Conventional in nature as well as slow to change the physical condition care sector might be obligatory to adopt more well organized work activities through the rising proliferation of telecommunication in health care provision and a rising emphasis upon answerability and efficiency of the community health care dough (Hopwood, 2007). Economic rationalist posture taken by rulers in Australia and further nations generally can also force health workers to implement and develop additional efficient information administration practices, wellbeing indicators, and finest practice care ways than presently working by this subdivision. The profit of a nationwide health data system are far accomplished, particularly in developing a additional effective health system in the course of better identifying and thoughtful community health needs, trends and in utilizing IT to the resourcefully in collection of data intended for the expansion of more appropriate presentation, measures and arithmetical indicators (Johnson, 2013). A logical and integrated move is called in favor of the design of a nationwide health data system, which incorporate the necessary and necessary security design to meet privacy apprehensions. Protecting information solitude poses complex opinionated, economic, technological, permissible, and social problems intended for systems developers in addition to health care supplies. Study show that there are 3 components concerned in the formulation and execution of privacy: community policy, legal organization and technological factors (Leiner, 2003). Examining technical apparatus alone, it is noticeable that the essential technologies are obtainable in Australia to offer the security of health check records necessary for public policy. This tool may comprise encryption, user and information authentication ways, authorization scheme, and mechanisms in favor of the prevention of data deduction. While not any of these obtainable measures are perfect, it is intended for most applications in somewhere in the encryption ways which can provide defense for a given duration of time (Mamoulis, 2012). Australia wants to develop a coherent nationwide policy for health data infrastructure to avoid fragmented, repeated, and incompatible structure, which rely on dissimilar standards and code of behavior (welfare, 2010). Such a policy shall only work via addressing the important issue of patient privacy inside a technological framework. The relevance of IT to health service systems is a receptive social experiment touching many professions together with general practitioners, medicinal administrators, politicians, trial lawyers, computer specialists, solitude advocates and clients whose records shall ultimately exist in the system (Park, 2005). Shortage of staff The surveys in Australia revealed that in accumulation to a shortage of employees who are experts in health information scheme, general health personnel in low income and middle-income counties usually lack the confidence as well as competence to carry out HIS tasks. A causal factor is poor universal awareness of the significance of health data systems as explained by one respondent, at current, most of the capacity based supervisors are ignorant about the health data system as well as its utility. All too frequently it looks like staff have inadequate cognizance of the worth and potential community health uses of statistics; they collect facts simply because they are instructed to do so. If staff, chiefly at the lower ranks, do not distinguish the benefits of aggregating and using the facts, their motivation to gather complete and accurate facts is likely to be little (Roger, 2009). An added matter is that HIS task and responsibilities need clarity. For example, more than a few respondents note that the wellbeing information system is frequently seen only as the major factor of data-entry clerks as well as HIS specialists such as information managers and epidemiologists. It was apparent from the writing that this outlook of health data systems as an expert role has created an extensive attitude among healthiness staff that HIS everyday jobs are additional load, which are not severely part of their function. This observation is confounded may be short of HIS competencies in teaching, professional development as well as role descriptions. To offset this finding, health structures need to encourage and provide an incentive to a culture of information in ensuring that all workers within the wellbeing system are conscious of their duties in sustaining the health data system. These comprise both duties of creating and using data as well as through stewardship of structure. Workers also need to be familiar with these duties are a center component of every roles in the wellbeing system (Rotmensz, 2012). The state of poor performance of information systems in Australia Health information systems HIS have developed in a haphazard and disjointed way because of economic, administrative, donor or legal pressures. The duty for health data is divided between diverse institutions or ministries, and coordination might be hard due to administrative and financial constraints. For instance, counting deaths and births, an essential building block of a HIS (health information system) is usually done by interior or planning ministries (Smith, 2000). Special efforts are thus required to ensure sufficient organization and sharing of information amid health ministries and other divisions. HIS (Health information systems) are fragmented by disease-focused strains, which frequently relate to donor necessities and international initiatives aimed at specific areas for example malaria, tuberculosis, or HIV/AIDS. Extreme pressure for the swift availability of information frequently adds to the establishment of disease explicit data systems determined by performance based backing (Smith, 2013). Australia risks being beleaguered by numerous and parallel, data demands which can stretch accessible resources past their limits. In the health segment itself, health personnel are overstrained by extreme reporting requirements from manifold and inadequately synchronized subsystems, which cannot deliver accurate, timely, and complete information. Even though an enormous amount of information might be collected, simply a small fraction is analyzed, synthesized, and used. In acknowledgment of the possible damage sourced by disintegration along precise disease lines, different countries are seeking a superior degree of assimilation. For instance, in Australia, integrated approaches have been employed to advance the performance of scrutiny activities at all category of the health system, habitually in order to deal with various diseases utilizing similar personnel, structures, and processes. Data are frequently presented and collected in basic formats, with no any effort at the analysis or synthesis needed information for appropriate everyday longer-term planning or management (Tan, 2001). According to Tan and Payton (2010) they stated in Australia, there is slight point in engaging in the resource and time consuming procedure of data collection when there is no obligation to analyzing the information, distributing the resulting data and employing it to advance health system functioning(Tan & Payton, 2010). Additionally, the staging epidemiological information is normally designed at specialists and other professionals. It is argued that, less attempt is made to present the data in formats, which are comprehensible and relevant to the public, policymakers, or those operating in sectors a part from health. Consequently, there is an extensively recognized discernment that health information is, unclear, obscure, and sometimes conflicting. Increased information demands compound the vulnerability of HIS (health information systems), particularly when joined with administrative pressures to reduce costs and raise effectiveness. When information is not accessible in reaction to user requirements, there might be a loss of reliability. When the people lose self-assurance in the honesty and reliability of data originating from the HIS (health information system), a ferocious series of under-investment and more decline ensues (Watson, 2004).Decision-makers at all categories of the health system require information which is relevant, reliable, and timely. Unluckily, even with high-quality data is obtainable this does not guarantee its apposite utilization in the decision making procedure (kalnos, 2013). Areas for improvement to Australia’s health information system In Australia, the long listing of health information system (HIS) problems is overwhelming. Much is going wrong; therefore, need to start to make things better. New challenges are currently emerging enthused by the increasing utilization of performance based payment mechanisms linked with increased pecuniary flows to health involvement. Greater concentration to impartiality in health and the data required to attain it are also rising as ordinary requirements. Challenges also originate from the need for sub national health information in the context of the devolution of public services. It is well built that there are many confront faced by health information system. On addressing these challenges, it will help to improve the quality of health information system. Addressing human resource shortages One of the challenges faced by health information system in Australia is shortages of staff hence, having a undesirable effect on the performance of health systems, principally in terms of health service delivery. On the review of literature, it is revealed that there are moderately many papers discussing the shortage of health information system skilled work force among general health personnel and even different papers that actually depict these skills and their idyllic allocation across the health labor force. A study in Australia commissioned in 2009, was in reality one of the initial to investigate the impact of a deficiency of healthcare personnel on the collection and utilization of health information. Study reveals that in the lack of specialized health information system roles it was important that general health workers were able to perform basic HIS tasks. kalnos (2013) argued that a general raise in the number of medical personnel would tackle the medical workforce shortage and the impacts of this on health information management, as data tasks might be shared. It is noted the need for health executive to emphasize the significance of information and it is utilized amongst staff and to offer employees with more feedback and training around (HIS) health information systems (kalnos, 2013). Andersen, (2012) similarly, illustrated that a shortage of personnel with skills in health management information system (HMIS) led to augmented workloads for other front-line health personnel and nurses (AbouZahr, 2012). Butler (2009) claimed that health management might be improved to higher quality by employing newly trained personnel to handle health data. It is also pointed out that challenges is attributed to shortage of staff in that environmental health technicians and nurses perform health information system tasks, and in extreme cases staff shortages may lead to community volunteers and maids performing task of managing the data. An assessment of 10 primary healthcare centers in Australia revealed that only one facility had a data-entry clerk. All health facility reported a high-perceived workload for information collection and collation while seven of the health facility reported that collation took a personnel member about two days for each month (Butler, 2009). In addressing shortage of health management officer, it is important to recruit additional health management information system. Recruitment will be achieved by increasing the amount of investment to health facility. According to Grossman (2011), organization or health facility should train health team on managing information or data (Grossman, 2011). With adequate knowledge, it will reduce the time require in handling data and improved on the quality of health information system hence translating to improved quality of care. Health facility-level competencies Health facilities competence level has been attributed as one of the ways of health information system in Australia. In ways of defining competencies at different levels, Perrin and Skillman, (2012) recommended that employees at the health centers level ought to be able to collate, collect, and report information (Perrin & Skillman, 2012). These essential functions is maintained Hewitt (2011), who also specify that there must be a focus on often collected quality information that is verified and timely against the raw information (Hewitt, 2011). Skillman, (2012) similarly accentuate the significance of high-quality data. Baldoni (2006) illustrated that the correct utilization of standard health system outline as a center competency for health personnel (Baldoni, 2006). Grossman (2011) did note, though, that front-line healthcare workers and nurses in Australia were not capable to complete standard forms since they had not received adequate training. Grossman (2011) recommended that all key healthcare courses must incorporate training on filling of tally sheets and standard forms, and provide health personnel with fundamental skills to carry out first round data collection and data analysis. Implementation of electronic health record system Most of the health facilities in Australia have not fully adopted electronic health record system, which has negative impact on the quality of healthcare delivery. Aberer (2011) pointed out that research has revealed a number of variables that enabled countries to make growth toward the execution of a national digital health record structure that meets the uniqueness of a well-working statistical system (Soto, 2011). The primary, and the most significant factor, is the maintenance of the electronic health documentation system design and execution. There are apparent advantages for nations aiming in the course of a single nationwide deployment of single electronic health documentation system. in attendance are also rewards where there are countrywide standards for the completion of the records, therefore a minimum set of information where the content go after terminology standards; as well as national interoperability principles. One-half of research participants have a countrywide body in charge for EHR communications development with who set principles for medical terminology used inside the records and principles for interoperability. Fewer than half of nations participating in this research have succeeded in executing a system in all electronic health proceedings have key information elements using a scientific terminology standard that is for diagnosis, present medications, as well as laboratory test outcomes. Many countries are deciding on the use of numerous standards for the similar data element. Wherever data is unstructured, in addition to where statistical scrutiny is desired, the employ of human coders or stylish technologies could be needed to generate structured data. A widely noticed barrier to the utilization of data as of electronic health documentation systems is concerns by means of the quality of the information, including both a deficient in of coded data plus badly coded information (Deshaies, 2006). More than half of national reports that have, data as of electronic health documentation are at present contributing to regular community health monitoring. Less research report have information to monitor patient protection and health system presentation. In nations with primary or very few guardians of databases as of electronic health documentation, it may be simpler to enable information use by centralizing liability for database formation, information identification, and review of submission for access to the information for monitoring as well as research. In countries by a large number of workers of databases as of electronic health documents, there are probable to be challenges as of within nation variation in data confidentiality protection rules and practices; plus custodian willingness to provide data when needed (welfare, 2010). Change of Legislation One more important step shall be to hold up countries in dropping unnecessary impediments to data utilization that can happen from differences in rules regarding the defense of health data privacy and/or dissimilarity in the explanation of what is essential and supportive to assure that clients privacy obligation are appreciated in the behavior of health evaluation and research. The outcomes of this research were brought to the consideration of experts in the study expertise of privacy directive through a joint discussion with health professional in May 2012 (Duncan, 2013). Contributors to combined consultation confirmed that worldwide action of the Organization on Economic Cooperation Development could be ready to lend a hand is in the development of a danger of classification of information and data uses. This facilitate to identify instances of higher risk to clients information confidentiality, and to related to the classification with suggested information, privacy protection put into practice that will allow even very responsive data to be second-hand for research and keep an eye on that is in the community interest. There is also worth in developing a universal vocabulary so that professionals in health, data confidentiality regulation, and data technology can better tell with each one and further to reach an ordinary understanding of the dilemma and the solutions (Campbell & Heywood, 2012). Working jointly is particularly significant now as there are rules reforms on the prospects in many nations, including proposed changes to the 1995 information Protection Directive to be converted into legislation contained by EU member nations. International proceedings to help to decrease unnecessary heterogeneity in confidentiality protections will hold up all countries in mounting up of privacy-respectful arithmetic and research uses of information and will promote the progression of internationally, proportional, indicators and confirmation to improve health, wellbeing care quality as well as health system presentation (Eyer, 2009). Conclusion Health information systems are an input building block in health system. This information is used for generating well-timed and reliable statistics, which is essential for data based health provision, delivery, and management. whilst there is rising recognition that knowledgeable decisions enhances decisions for sound health data required for deciding which is often unavailable and unexploited in low and average-income nations. On status of health information system, major administrative predicament, facing the Australian nationwide health care organization is the necessity to reform practices linked with massive information overwork. Health information systems HIS have developed in a haphazard and disjointed way because of economic, administrative, donor or legal pressures. On areas for improvement to Australia’s health information system, it is well established that there are various challenges faced by health information system. On addressing these challenges, it will help to improve the quality of health information system. One of the challenges faced by health information system in Australia is shortages of staff hence, having a negative effect on the performance of health systems, principally in terms of health service delivery. List of References AbouZahr, C. (2012). Assessing and monitoring Assessing and monitoring information systems. Building health information systems , 77. Aiken, A. D. (2004). XML for data management. . Amsterdam: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann. Andersen, R. K. (2001). Changing theAustralia. health care system key issues in health services, policy, and management (2nd ed.). HIS , 56. Baldoni, R. ( 2006). Global data management. . Amsterdam: IOS Press. Butler, D. (2009). . Systems engineering to improve traumatic brain injury care in the military health system workshop summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Campbell, A. S., & Heywood. (2012). From data to decision making in health: the evolution of a health management information system. australian government jornal , 22. Deshaies, J. (2006). Health information system,. Washington: U.S: Bureau of the Census. Duncan, K. (2013). Health information and health reform: understanding the need for a national health information system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Eyer, W. (2009). PSIP: program and system information protocol ; naming, numbering, and navigation for digital television. New York: NcGraw-Hill. Grossman, C. (2011). Digital infrastructure for the learning health system the foundation for continuous improvement in health and health care : workshop series summary. . Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. Henningfeld, D. (2009). Health. australian heal information jornal , 55. Hewitt, M. (2011). Improving health literacy within a state workshop summary. Washington, DC:: National Academies Press. Hopwood, M. (2007). An evaluation of the CLINFO data management and analysis system prepared for the National Institutes of Health. health statistic jornal , 77. Johnson, S. (2013, 6 12). System health management with aerospace applications. Retrieved 11 2, 2012, from AUstralian: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468336 kalnos. (2013). Assessing the national health information system an assessment tool (Version 4.00. ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization. kalnos, F. (2013). Health data management. . New York, NY: : Faulkner & Gray. Leiner, F. (2003). Medical data management a practical guide. . New York: Springer. Mamoulis, N. (2012). Spatial data management. San Rafael,. health management jornal , 44. Park, M. (2005). Eye health in Australia. monthly jornal , 77. Perrin, D. J., & Skillman. (2012). Health performance measurement in the public sector principles and policies for implementing an information network. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Roger, v. (2009). Clinical IT in aged care interim report. Canberra, A.C.T: Dept. of Health and Ageing. Rotmensz, N. (2012). Data management and clinical trials: EORTC Study Group on Data Management. . Amsterdam: Elsevier. Smith, J. (2000). Health management information systems: a handbook for decision makers. . Buckingham: Open University Press. Read More