StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy Henslin defined a bureaucracy as “a formal organization with a hierarchy of authority, a clear division of labor” and as an organization that emphasizes on “written rules, communications, and records” and “impersonality of positions.”1 In addition, Henslin pointed out that the great sociologist Max Weber recommended in 1947 that bureaucracies must acquire four features.2 First, it must have “clear cut levels” with assignments flowing downwards and accountability flowing upwards.3 Second, it must have a division of labor.4 Third, it must have written rules.5 And fourth, it must have written communications and records.6 As go…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy"

Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy Henslin defined a bureaucracy as “a formal organization with a hierarchy ity, a cleardivision of labor” and as an organization that emphasizes on “written rules, communications, and records” and “impersonality of positions.”1 In addition, Henslin pointed out that the great sociologist Max Weber recommended in 1947 that bureaucracies must acquire four features.2 First, it must have “clear cut levels” with assignments flowing downwards and accountability flowing upwards.

3 Second, it must have a division of labor.4 Third, it must have written rules.5 And fourth, it must have written communications and records.6 As governments can be generally characterized to have the four characteristics that both Weber and Henslin had emphasized, it can be argued that the influence of Weber on public administration is clear. The 1947 work of Weber in Henslin’s bibliography was the book, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, first published in 1913 but republished in 1947.

According to Kenneth Allan, Weber pointed in out in 1968 that there are six preconditions for bureaucracy: the preconditions involve increases in size and space of the population being organized, complexity of tasks, use of markets and money economy, communication and transportation technologies, use of mass democracy, and volume of complicated and rationalized culture.7 Allan emphasized that there have been “historical shift” to bureaucratic organizations consistent with Weberian prescriptions, implying that this is also the case for public administration.

8 Allan also quoted Weber to have said in 1968 that the “pervasive presence of bureaucratic organization has forced people to rationally control life” as well as become specialists.9 The views of Max Weber on bureaucracy and public in the 21st century continues to be influential such that in June 2010, the Quality of Government Institute based in the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, designed a cross-national study on public administration based on the theories of Max Weber. The University of Gothenburg study measured public administration performance of 58 countries “according to their degree of Weberianism.

”10 In the study, Dahlstrom et al. concluded that in the 58 countries included in their study sample, “institutional designers and policymakers interested in meritocratic bureaucracies tend to follow the standard view of Weberianism.”11 In a 34-page work on what the author described as a “comprehensive outline” of Weber’s work on administration” and with a view towards advocating “Weberian Public Administration,” Eugenie Samier pointed out that Weber’s contributions to public administration are in three dimensions: history, values, and the use of authority or the use of a combination of three forms of authority.

12 On what Samier called as Weber’s contribution of “history” to public administration, Samier emphasized that in Weberian public administration, “history provides evidence” on the correctness of a public administration action. Samier elaborated that “while Weber’s approach is often regarded as sociological, it is actually a comparative historical-sociology derived from and applied to actual empirical cases.”13 Thus, Samier suggests that public administration must derive its practice on what is indicated to be correct from the standpoint of practical experience.

In line with this, Samier argued for a “historically grounded approach for public administration.”14 According to Samier, a historically grounded approach to public administration means that it must be recognized that public administration is continuously influenced by changing societal forces, public administration arises from a historical context, and that specific public administration styles are produced from the “unique particularity” of the “characteristic social action of the individuals comprising them.

”15 In arguing for Weberian public administration, Samier argued that Weber’s emphasis on the role of values for public administration had been at three levels: values embedded on individuals or public servants by history and culture, the role of values in determining what situations will be considered as “problems” and how problems will be defined, and the principle that individuals and institutions are “ultimately moral agents.”16 In arguing for Weberian public administration, Samier criticized that too often, authority is derived from the legal/rational.

17 In contrast, Samier argued that public administration must also derive authority from traditions and charisma. The author elaborated that authority on the last two can be derived by “maintaining social fabric, advancing liberal and democratic values, and most importantly in combating a thoroughly disenchanted world in which people find themselves.”18 In addition to the materials discussed, several other works have recognized the contributions and impact of Weber to bureaucracy and public administration.

In particular, William Anderson pointed out that one of the important contributions of Weber on bureaucracy studies is that Weber broke away from the tendency to be merely descriptive and promoted the use of “conceptual instruments for comparisons and measurements.”19 It can be argued that the work of Dahlstrom et al. had been along Weber’s prescription because the Dahlstrom et al. study used conceptual tools in assessing whether public administration proceeded according to Weber’s prescriptions in 58 countries.

The study of Alajloni et al. affirmed of the continuing relevance of the ideas of Weber to bureaucracy and public administration.20 The study of Olsen for a journal on public administration theory and research advocated the use of Weberian conceptual framework for public administration professionals.21 The article elaborated concepts on bureaucracy for the public administration profession which are consistent with Weberian views. Further, the study of Vinni (2007) has explicitly recognized that there are many in the public administration profession that continues to believe in the relevance of Weberian views despite the newer frameworks for public administration.

22 This was also the point of the study of Wren et al. (2002) as well as Whimster (2008, 236).23 Bibliography Alajloni, Mahmoud, Ziad Almashaqba and Marzoug Ayed Nemer Al-Qeed. 2010. “The Classical Theory of Organization and Its Relevance.” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 41: 60-67. Allan, Kenneth. 2010. Exploration in Classical Sociological Theory. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press. Anderson, William. 2004. “Mises versus Weber on Bureaucracy and Sociological Method.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 18 (Winter): 1-29.

Dahlstrom, Carl, Victor Lapuente and Jan Teorell. 2010. “Dimensions of Bureaucracy: A Cross-National Dataset on the Structure and Behavior of Public Administration.” Quality of Government Working Paper Series 2010: 13. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Henslin, James. 2004. Essentials of Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson. Olsen, Johan. 2005. “Maybe it is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 1-24.

Samier, Eugenie. 2005. “Towards a Weberian Public Administration: The Infinite Web of History, Values, and Authority in Administrative Mentalities.” Halduskultuur 6: 60-94. Vinni, Rauno. 2007. “Total quality management and administration of public administration.” International Public Management Review 8: 103-131. Wren, Daniel, Arthur Bedeian, and John Breeze. 2002. “The Foundation of Henri Fayol’s Administrative Theory.” Management Decision 40: 906-918. Whimster, Sam. 2008. Understanding Weber.

London and New York: Routledge.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1433149-max-weber-bureaucracy
(Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/management/1433149-max-weber-bureaucracy.
“Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1433149-max-weber-bureaucracy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Impact of Weber on Public Administration: Bureaucracy

Max Weber Biography

The most important of weber's work are the “Protestant Ethic thesis” which was about a non-Marxist genealogy of present capitalism and “Rationalization thesis” which talked about the analysis of the dominance of west in the present times.... On top of that, he had influence on social theory and social research (weber, 2009).... weber emphasized on cultural influences as the bedrock of capitalism (Kalberg, 2002).... In search for religion insight, weber's publication of protestant ethics, he was able to identify the non-development of capitalism in the societies: ancient Judaism, religion of China and religion of India and was able to analyze the social stratification of such societies....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

Comparison of Mises versus Weber on Bureaucracy and its Consequences on Society

Thesis Statement: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the opposing perspectives of Ludwig von Mises and Max weber on bureaucracy and its consequences on society.... bureaucracy “denotes the general, formal, structural elements of a type of human organisation” (Weber (2) 50), particularly relating to governmental administration.... Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973), the Austrian… nomist and social philosopher, and Max Weber (1864-1920), the German sociologist, philosopher and political economist had different methodological approaches to the study of ‘bureaucracy' based on its sociological and economic perspectives....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Concept of Bureaucracy

With regard to public administration along with social science background, the term bureaucracy defines various inconvenient or bothersome features that possess by the contemporary organizations.... With reference to the case scenario, the death of Kristin can be duly considered as an unfortunate and a disgraceful event which reflects an essential learning regarding the role of public administration.... This is generally adopted and executed for the purpose of mitigating any sort of rational situation and offering effective solutions concerning various management issues that… In relation to the definition of weber, “bureaucratic organizations are the most rational means of carrying out imperative control over human beings....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Bureaucracy and Scientific Management

This paper 'bureaucracy and Scientific Management" focuses on the fact that in today's society, bureaucracy is an organization model and is an inevitable part of it.... nbsp;… Weber was by no means a partisan of bureaucracy but he was largely concerned by the rapid spread of this system throughout the state and business institutions were the society was becoming an iron cage.... It should be born in mind that bureaucracy limits the freedom of human and it is a formation of a static institution....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Why Is Bureaucracy's Relationship to Democracy So Conflicted

This paper "Why Is bureaucracy's Relationship to Democracy So Conflicted?... focuses on the fact that the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy continues to face diverse conflicts.... There are several concerns of tension, disagreement, and conflict involved in issues pertaining to bureaucracy.... Both democracy and bureaucracy present unethical properties in the political arrangement.... bureaucracy's relationship to democracy is so conflicted because of the paradoxical relationship that involves satisfying both the emotional and societal interests....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Concept of Bureaucracy as an Effective System of An Organization

nbsp;… The work of Max Weber on bureaucracy has a huge impact on public administration.... Van Riper (1997 cited in Du Gay, 2000) has argued on the work of Max Weber and have stated that it does not have any influence on American public administration.... The model of weber treated as the descriptive version of the organizational model of Taylor is based on the scientific management theory.... The goal of the paper is to provide an overview of the bureaucracy, describe its history and application....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Impact of Weber on Public Administration - Bureaucracy

impact of weber on public administration: Bureaucracy Henslin defined a bureaucracy as “a formal organization with a hierarchy ity, a cleardivision of labor” and as an organization that emphasizes on “written rules, communications, and records” and “impersonality of positions.... As governments can be generally characterized to have the four characteristics that both Weber and Henslin had emphasized, it can be argued that the influence of weber on public administration is clear....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Scientific Evaluation of the American Public Administration

This essay analyzes the scientific approach and its impact on the US public administration.... hellip; public administration definition has remained difficult owing to its close interaction, associations, and influences from fields like political science, law, human relations, and social science.... Owing to the numerous fields from which public administration borrows, there are many approaches to public administration.... In order to define public administration, Katsamunska classified public administration approaches as classical and modern....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us