StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Enforceability of the Contract between the Mother and Her Child - Assignment Example

Summary
The paper "Enforceability of the Contract between the Mother and Her Child" discusses that in the case of Coward v MIB (1962), a friend agreed to take petrol money and in exchange for a job which later turns out not to be the case has the friend failed to give him the job. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Enforceability of the Contract between the Mother and Her Child"

Student’s name Course code+name Professor’s name University name City, State Date of submission TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 1.0 Problem one 3 2.0 Problem two 4 3.0 Problem three 6 4.0 Problem four 7 5.0 Problem five 9 1.0 Problem one a) What is/are the issue/s you need to consider? The issue to be considered here is the enforceability of the contract between the mother and her child. What is the different between the social agreement, domestic agreement and commercial agreement? b) What is/are the relevant legal rule/s relating to this problem For many years, the law of contract have explicitly distinguishes between the domestic agreement and commercial agreements. In most cases the law assumed that there is no intention to create any kind of legal relationship in the cases of social and domestic agreements. Some of the cases include Jones v Padavatton (1969)1 in this case the Judge decided that the member of the family do not intend to make agreement among them to have legal agreement. In this case, the mother persuaded here daughter to resign as a secretary and read for a bar in England and in the process the mother would provide for her. But later the mother change the agreement terms and provided a house instead2. c) What is/are the main case/s related to this problem? The main case is lack of performance of the part of contract agreement. Though the child has performed his part, the mother has failed to fulfill her part. Hence breaching the contract she has made d) Based on this information, if Chloe sues her mother for breach of contract, will she win in court? What is your answer – Yes? or No? Explain your answer. No. there family agreements does not meet the threshold of legal contract has they are being made without intention to be legally enforceable. This is presented in the case of Jones v Padavatton (1969)3 and the case of Balfour v Balfour (1919) ,here the court decided that the husband did not make this agreement with the intend to make legal agreement. 2.0 Problem two a) What is/are the issue/s you need to consider? (1mark) The issue here is misrepresentation of the fact which amount to fraud. Since Tony gave an offer to Julie which Julie accepted? The acceptance was to specific conditions which the tractor had to meet before it could be accepted by Julia; Tony gave Julia wrong information concerning the goods to be bought hence fraud. Fraudulent misrepresentation or a deceit is where one makes false statement made either knowingly or not believing in the truth about it or careless and reckless without minding the truth or fact in it. The case of the same is Derry Vs Peek (1889)4 b) What is/are the relevant legal rule/s relating to this problem? (1mark) Incase the misrepresentation is fraudulent in nature or, rebuttable presumption that it induced contract; then it is actionable by law and the person who has make that inducement is personally liable. The case in hand is Dadourian Group International Inc.Vs. Simms (Damages) (2009)5. In our case, Tony induce Julia to enter into a contract of buying the tractor but Tony knew very well that the tractor does not meet the requirements in which Julia needed it for. c) What is/are the main case/s related to this problem? (1 mark) The case is misrepresentation of fact which amount to inducement of hence punishable by law. Tony owe July duty of disclosing fact concerning the contract but if July would have known the fact the Tony would have not been affected by not telling Julie what she already knows before entering into the contract this is the same case in Keates v. The Earl of Cadogan (1851); and also in Turner v. Green (1895) the same case was also in the case of Bell v. Lever Bros. Ltd. (1932) d) Based on this information, if Julia sues Tony for breach of contract, will she win in court? What is your answer – Yes? Or No? Explain your answer. (2 marks) Yes, she would win the court case. Since Julie is innocent in this case therefore is up to her either to rescind or to affirm contract if he rescind the contract then they will go back to square one and if she confirm the contract then she will be deemed to have accepted the contract as it was therefore loses every right to be compensated. 3.0 Problem three a) What is/are the issue/s you need to consider? (1mark) The issue of the discussion here is whether the social agreement is enforceable by law as Russell fails to owner the agreements to pay his friend $1000 after he has sold out the car. The question to be asked here is whether the friendship promise and agreement which Russell mad amount to contract which is enforceable by law or not. b) What is/are the relevant legal rule/s relating to this problem? (1mark) In the case of Coward v MIB (1962)6, a friend agreed to take petrol money and in exchange of a job which later turns out not to be the case has the friend failed to give him the job. The court held that, an agreement which was mad out of friendship to work in exchange of petrol money was a friendship arrangement therefore lacks contractual intention. The same case applies in our case. The gift of $1000 if the car is sold above the target price is out of friendship hence lack contractual intention hence not enforceable by law. c) What is/are the main case/s related to this problem? (1 mark) The main case is that of Coward v MIB (1962)7, his friend failed to take his work in exchange of petrol money as initially agreed upon. d) Based on this information, if Greta sues Russell for breach of contract, will she win in court? What is your answer – Yes? or No? Explain your answer. (2 marks) No, he will not win the case, this is because the agreement is out of social relationship or friendship which had no intention to make contractual agreement hence he will lose the case. Similar decision was held in the case of Coward v MIB (19628 where the court said that the friend’s agreement lacks intention to enter into contractual agreement. 4.0 Problem four a) What is/are the issue/s you need to consider? (2marks) Is whether he actually consented to the risk or not, this is majorly in law of tort where volenti non fit Injuria applies. Secondly, the act by elephant amount to inevitable accident where no precautions could have been taken to prevent it by the defendant or not. b) What is/are the relevant legal rule/s relating to this problem? (2marks) The general rule here is that, no one can complain to any harm he has personally consented to. The owner of the car actually read the instructions that the management will not be liable incase of any damage the car gets in the parking, by going a head to park, then that implies that he has personally consented to the risk hence no case against the management. In the second part, there is no negligence in the part of the management as the accident is inevitable. c) What is/are the main case/s related to this problem (2marks) In the case of Stanley vs. Powell (18919) the bullet rebound back after heating the tree and heat the complainant hence the defendant was not liable because what happened was as a result of accident. In the case Khimji Vs Tanga Mombasa Transport Co. Ltd (1962)10, the driver yielded to the pressure from the passengers who wanted to cross the swollen river hence they consented to the risk of crossing the swollen river. d) In each scenario, based on this information, if Guy sues the NRL for breach of contract will he win in court? What are your answers – Yes? or No? Explain your answer. (4 marks) No the guys would not win the case since he willingly consented to the risk by parking the car as in the case of Stanley vs. Powell (1891) and in the case of case Khimji Vs Tanga Mombasa Transport Co. Ltd (1962)11. 5.0 Problem five a) What is the issue you need to consider? (1 mark) The issue to be considered here is whether the contractual agreement had existed between the two parties or not. If the contract had existed then, the legal actions of breach of contract existed and if not then, there is no contractual obligation between the parties b) What is (or are) the relevant legal rule (or rules) relating to this problem? (1 mark) The breach of contractual agreement is punishable by law and remedies include compensation and specific performance of the contract. c) What is (or are) the main case (or cases) related to this problem? (1 mark) Breach of contract occurs if the parties to the contract fail to perform their duties resulting to the breach. Some cases include, Bettini vs Gye 12and in the case of Poussard Vs Spiers13 d) Based on this information, if Susan sues Mac for a breach of contract will she win in court? What is your answer – Yes? or No? Explain your answer. (2 marks) Yes Susan would succed in sueing Mac since the breach of contract exist in their agreement but Mac have decided to rent the house a gain without her permission have leasing the house to her Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Enforceability of the Contract between the Mother and Her Child

Essential Elements of a Binding Contract

The objectives of the contract theory are to show how a contract is formulated and enforced.... The main obligations of an offeror in a contract include specifications of the terms of the contract.... The offeror must specify the duration of the contract and the day that the contract will expire.... If any of the parties does not bind by the rules of the contract, there exists a breach of contract.... The courts rely on the words that a party said when he/she was entering into the contract, the actions of the party before he/she entered or what the appearance of the party looked like before entering into a contract....
25 Pages (6250 words) Research Paper

Canadian Public and Private Law and International Law

They may be based on negotiated terms between the parties or on standard wordings as many insurance contracts are.... ( Civil Law in Canada {Torts}) A person may carelessly bump into another causing him/her to fall, sustaining injuries.... Contract Law Artifact Canadian contract law refers to that branch of civil law that pertains to the conditions required for a valid enforceable contract or agreement between parties.... Analysis Binding contracts are freely entered into agreements between individuals, groups and/or businesses to perform a specified service or provide a designated product to the other contracted party/parties in exchange for consideration, that is, money, benefit, right or interest, or some forbearance, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Bilateral, Unilateral, Unenforceable, Voidable and Void Contracts

The validity and the enforceability of the contract depend on the provisions of the laws that cover the kind of contract that was formed.... Likewise, a third party who has no participation or connection in the formation of the contract cannot be sued.... A bilateral contract is one in which both the contracting parties formulated and agreed upon the terms and conditions of the contract.... There was an exchange of promises between the nursing home and the laboratory and the performance of the promise by one party will give rise to the performance of the promise of the other party....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

X and Y Attorneys at Law

This brings us to your matter and the question of the enforceability of the verbal agreement.... This case study "X and Y Attorneys at Law" focuses on the oral agreement between the marketing and sales manager and the brewery.... In some firms, in particular, partners need to understand that they need to coach employees on an ongoing basis, not just mention their shortcomings at appraisals," (Younsun) The major issue you have at hand is a no-compete contract where the contract was an oral agreement....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

Definition of the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel

The paper "The Contract Can Be Considered a Promise" discusses that a promise in a particular contract might not be legally enforceable if it lacks the presence of a proper consideration made between the two parties.... However, it can be observed that there are exceptional cases wherein contracts have been enforced under law, despite the absence of proper or visible consideration between the two parties1.... the contract can also be considered as a promise made by one party to the other, wherein each of the parties is liable to enjoy both the benefits as well as detriments associated with the same....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Principle of Confidentiality in Relation to Mediation

The paper 'The Principle of Confidentiality in Relation to Mediation' looks at an important feature of mediation – proceedings.... For a successful mediation, parties to mediation have to freely exchange their views without the risk of sensitive matters adverse to a party being disclosed.... ...
12 Pages (3000 words) Dissertation

Law of Contract Assessment

Based on the validity of the contract, the legal position derived from the contract is fairly defined in this case.... The question of building construction is extraneous to the contract and going by the facts of the case, the performance of the contract is not contingent upon the building permission.... The competency of the parties to the contract is not under question.... Also, 'the plot is restricted to 'educational purposes' only' cannot be treated as a defect in property as the reservation for various purposes is common; SkyReach could not allege concealment of information, and the contract is also not conditional on a specific use of the plot....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

The Law of Contract Concerning Belinda and Adam

These prerequisites allow the enforceability of the contract between Belinda and Adam.... Furthermore, the contract between Belinda and Adam must be of a legal nature.... Legal jargon defines the 'guilty party' as one who breaches the contract whereas the other party is known as the 'aggrieved party' or the 'injured party'.... Accordingly, we assume (since it's only indicated that 'Adam and Belinda' entered into a contract and had an agreement) that before entering into the contract on 1st January 2011 there was, firstly, an offer (Gibson & Fraser, 2010)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us