StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now" focuses on the critical analysis of the implementation of the second amendment in 1776 and now. The US Constitution has undergone several amendments overtime to meet some targets and solve emerging issues…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now"

The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now The U.S Constitution has undergone several amendments over time to meet some targetsand solve emerging issues. One of the amendments is the Second Amendment that states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Baron 1). The Amendment has created a lot of controversy with regard to the debate on the issue of gun control. According to proponents for stricter gun control, the amendment seeks to protect the rights of States to uphold militia groups. However, the opponents of the regulations respond by asserting that the aim of the amendment was to guard an individual right (Barnett 2). English common law has recognized the significance of proper arms control for a long time. The founding fathers believed that citizens have a right to own arms when working in the militia. Such right ensures the presence of maximum protection and security since people can defend themselves whenever need arises (Cornell 10). The Supreme Court of the US has upheld the amendment in its three decisions in the years 1876, 1886 as well as in 1939. Therefore, the founding fathers advocated for collective rights interpretation whereby people were allowed to own arms only when in a group such as the militia but not individuals. The founding fathers had in mind the dangers of permitting individual citizens to purchase and own guns in the society. According to them, such permission would promote weapon related violence, and thereby make the society an unsafe place to live in. This collective right interpretation had prevailed in America for over a century, and therefore, it had been recognized and used in three Supreme Court rulings (Cornell 15). However, this meaning remained no-contentious until in 1960 when an additional individual right to bear arms for self-defense was recognized. Therefore, the assertion of the individual right has made Americans to currently consider that the Second Amendment warrants their right to own a gun (Charles 27). The individual rights model has either undercut or blocked passage of laws that regulate purchase and use of guns over the last twenty years. For instance, the assault weapons prohibition of 1994 was permitted to expire after ten years due to intense pressure from gun rights activists and organizations (Doherty 31). Even though the gun’s lobby persistence that the long common laws and traditions have existed supporting an individual’s right to own and use weapons, the English law has regulated guns from the 14th century (Gonzales 45). This is because of the existence of Game Laws that restricted ownership of weapons only to the wealthy people who had substantial income and owned huge lands (Baron 3). Therefore, the middle class as well as peasants were not permitted to own or use weapons such as guns. Currently, gun lobbyists argue that the English Bill of Rights presented to the monarchs by the House of Commons in 1689 guaranteed everyone to own and use weapons (Anderson and Horwitz 35). However, the law restricted the ownership to Protestants who were of the right social class. Further, the Bill of Rights acknowledged the need for the law to regulate weapons. In this regard, the Bill of Rights does not recognize ownership and use of weapons among the middle class as well as the common citizens (Labunski 53). The privilege to possess and use weapons—more so, guns—was left to the wealthy people in the society. In Britain, the law on gun control has been maintained while in the US, there has been growing resistance to regulation of possession and use of guns. The most recent case occurred in March 2007, when the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recognized the individual rights model (Smith 36). It decided that the ban on handguns since 1976 in Washington D.C. has been in violation of the Second Amendment that guarantees the right of an individual to own and use guns. According to the court, the Second Amendment did not vividly associate gun ownership and use with the militia service. Citing majority opinion in ruling the case, the presiding judge, Judge Silberman asserted that the first clause within the amendment referred to as the “militia clause” was just prefatory and, therefore, lacked importance with regard to the amendment’s functioning second clause (Maer and Gay 54). Therefore, the first clause was not as significant as the second clause which recognized individual’s right to bear and use weapons. The operative clause, therefore, hindered Washington City from implementing ban on the use of handguns. The decision by the court to dismiss the first section of the Second Amendment as perambulatory proved that the founding fathers of the 18th century never saw it from that perspective (Finkelman 267). Moreover, the court’s interpretation of the meanings of the word “militia” as well as the phrase “bear arms,” to support their case, shows a great disparity from the interpretation held by the federal government in early years and at present (“Founding Fathers” 2). The ruling permitting a lift on the ban on the citizens to bear and use weapons, and especially handguns, promoted purchase and use of guns within Washington City, thereby hindering effort to fight and curb weapon related violence. Thus, the ruling promoted gun related violence, which resulted into much injuries and deaths among the citizens. However, Washington D.C. appealed against the decision within the U.S Supreme Court. The court granted certiorari as well as heard oral arguments contained in the case, thereby renaming it District of Columbia v. Heller, on March 18, 2007 (Baron 3). Nonetheless, the court will issue its ruling on the matter before the end of its current term. The District had to seek for support from various groups and organizations such as the City of Chicago, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, legislators, the American Bar Association among others in support of the appeal. The ruling of the lower court, therefore, had massive impact on the lifestyle of the citizens of Washington City. For that reason, there is need for its reversal. First, the court’s ruling was based on the second part, yet the Second Amendment was supposed to be read in entirety (Halbrook 43). The court disregarded the first part and recognized the second part as the most important, thereby allowing ordinary citizens to purchase and use weapons, especially handguns. Since the first section of the amendment is connected syntactically and semantically to the second part, the court should reconsider its view on the amendment (Baron 3). According to the court, the purpose of the second comma is to divide the amendment into two parts. Therefore, the first part becomes prefatory while the second section entails the operative (Tushnet 57). Even though the second comma separates the sentence syntactically, it is not certain that it is used to separate the unimportant section from important section both at present and in the 18th century (Baron 3). Thus, separating the two components of the amendment amounts to bias judgment and ruling. Moreover, the court should consider that the first section of the amendment denotes the purpose of the second; therefore, the right to own and keep arms is directly connected to the requirement of a proper regulated militia. In addition, in the 18th century, the phrase “bear arms” had a customary as well as traditional meaning attached to military contexts (Tushnet 57). The meaning was never in the contexts of self-defense or hunting. Therefore, the interpretation of the Second Amendment should be considered as per the context of the 18th century since it was the belief of the founding fathers. To regulate the use of weapons like guns, the founding fathers’ belief should be considered since they were the drafters of the amendment. Finally, in the interpretation of the Second Amendment, the word “militia” needs to be considered as it was in the federal period (Whitney 78). In the federal period, the word referred to an organized and properly trained group of citizen soldiers. The term also referred to people who are eligible to serve in the organized group and therefore can provide security to the state as well as to the citizens. Thus, the term does not recognize anybody or the fact that all Americans can possess and use weapons (Winkler 12). This is because during that time, the majority of Americans were not allowed to join militia service as they were regarded as subjects to the British colonists. Consequently, the interpretation of the phrases “bears arms” and “well-regulated militia” has resulted into heated debate on the right of individuals to own and use firearms in the US (Labunski 55). Since both the American jurisprudence as well as the British law acknowledged the need to regulate the use of weapons by the public, there is little chance that the Court will quash all handgun control regulations (Smith 42). However, since the incidences of gun related violence has been on the rise, there should be stricter regulations on gun ownership and use. For instance, the incident of U.S. school shooting which left 26 people killed, among them 20 schoolchildren, is so touchy (Baron 8). The incident, which occurred in the state of Connecticut, had a gunman opening fire and killing 20 primary school children on the spot. This incident occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School located in Newton. The gunman who was a youth in his twenties was also among the deceased. It was the deadliest incident that has ever occurred in US history (Baron 9). The event is just but an example of the gun related violence that calls for the regulation of gun ownership and use. In case there had been stricter regulations on gun use and regulations, the incident might not have occurred. Therefore, even though the final version of the Second Amendment recognizes the relationship between a well-regulated militia and arms, it does not state that arms should be owned for self-defense or for killing of game. Following the U.S. school shooting incident, I look forward to enactment of more laws regulating possession and use of guns. Enactment and enforcement of such laws will reduce weapon related violence and thus make the society safer. Works Cited Anderson, Casey, and Joshua Horwitz. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009. Print. Baron, Dennis. “Guns and Grammar: the Linguistics of the Second Amendment.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. University of Illinois Board of Trustees, n.d. Web. 25 April 2013. Barnett, Gary E. "The Reasonable Regulation of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms". The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 6.2 (24 June 2008). Print. Charles, Patrick J. The Second Amendment: The Intent and Its Interpretation by the States and the Supreme Court. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland & Co, 2009. Print. Cornell, Saul. A Well-Regulated Militia — The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America. New York, 2006. Print. Doherty, Brian. Gun Control on Trial: Inside the Supreme Court Battle Over the Second Amendment. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2008. Print. Finkelman, Paul. “It Really Was About a Well Regulated Militia.” Syracuse Law Review, 59 (2008): 267. Print. "Founding Fathers: Virginia". FindLaw Constitutional Law Center. FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business, n.d. Web. 25 April 2013. Gonzales, Doreen. A Look at the Second Amendment: To Keep and Bear Arms. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 2008. Print. Halbrook, Stephen P. The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee, 2012. Print. Labunski, Richard, E. James Madison and the struggle for the Bill of Rights. Oxford University Press US, 2006. Print. Maer, Lucinda, and Oonagh Gay. "The Bill of Rights 1689". Parliament and Constitution Centre. Parliament, 9 Oct. 2009. Web. 25 April 2013. < http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-00293.pdf> Smith, Douglas G. "The Second Amendment and the Supreme Court". The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 6 (Summer 2008). Print. Tushnet, Mark. V. Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns. Oxford University Press, 2007. Print. Whitney, Craig R. Living with Guns: A Liberal's Case for the Second Amendment. New York: Public Affairs, 2012. Print. Winkler, Adam. "Scrutinizing the Second Amendment". Michigan Law Review, 105 (February 2007). Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1475082-the-second-amendment-in
(The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1475082-the-second-amendment-in.
“The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1475082-the-second-amendment-in.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Second Amendment in 1776 and Now

Has equality made America freer

Along the way, it touches the history and the differences of America then and now, which will be the basis of the answer to the question “Has equality made America freer?... In the Declaration of Independence in 1776, it pronounced that “all men are created equal.... The Thirteenth Amendment was followed by the Fourteenth amendment in 1868 which stated that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Does George Washington deserve the title Father of our nation

He depicted his readiness to go to war when he appeared in military attire in front of the second Continental Congress.... The founding fathers of America have to be perfect, they have to be immaculate or else America would be deemed imperfect.... This illusion is what deprives people like Thomas Jefferson to be termed as the ‘Father of the Nation' while only bestowing this title unto George Washington....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution

First of all, the 10th amendment of the constitution only clarified the existing enumeration powers of the federal government, but refused to adjust its powers to make a change.... As a result, the States felt obliged to support the constitution, due to the assurance of the tenth amendment, which confirmed that powers not delegated to the central government would reside with the respective States (Mooney 58).... Nothing was new because individuals were already protected by the bill of rights in the respective States constitutions; the only change was its further inclusion in the national constitution, yet the federal powers over war, taxes, commerce, and implied powers were not restricted by the amendment (Dry 5)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

American government and politics

Madison had recently graduated from the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University) and was unsure what to do with his life.... At the Revolutionary Convention, delegate George Mason had proposed an amendment guaranteeing "toleration" of all faiths.... He sought to expand religious liberty rights beyond mere toleration and argued for the "free exercise" of religion -- a concept that would later resurface in the First amendment....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The HIstory of Slavery

This essay, The HIstory of Slavery, declares that in history, slavery and war have both  been considered inevitable consequences of human nature.... Yet slavery has been abolished, and moral progress has significantly contributed to slavery's disappearance.... hellip; As the paper stresses despite the disappearance of slavery in Great Britain, in the American and West Indian colonies of the British Empire, slavery was a way of life and for some reason, it was easier to abolish slavery in Great Britain than it was in the United States....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

2nd amendment - the right to bare arms- US Constitution

After the Revolution of 1776, first American states united under the Articles of Confederation (Bill of Rights Institute 7).... The amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791.... The American Civil War took place between 1861 and 1865… Simultaneous with the ratification of amendment 2, nine other amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791.... These are: amendment 2, together with the 10 other amendments, was probably considered very important The 10 amendments were ratified only four years after the signing of the US Constitution....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

What were the historical origins of the Second Amendments protection to keep and bear arms

This explains the historical origin of the second amendments protection to keep and bear arms.... The origin of the right to keep and bear arms all started with the culture of having guns, then events that brought fear among people, then valid arguments for the need of arms.... hellip; ns at first had the culture of carrying arms with them for normal life purposes; that is protection, maintaining order in the society, and hunting for food....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Early Colonial Constitutions

This work called "Early Colonial Constitutions" focuses on constitutional colonial history.... The author takes into account how a system with several shortcomings became a vital element in the preparation of a new constitution for America and the colonial empire itself.... From this work, it is clear the process of the notion of establishing conventions....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us