StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Statutory Interpretation in Doctrine of Judicial Precedent - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Statutory Interpretation in Doctrine of Judicial Precedent" focuses on the critical analysis of the level of engagement of the doctrine of judicial precedent with statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation and judicial precedent are the two important sources of law…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Statutory Interpretation in Doctrine of Judicial Precedent
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Statutory Interpretation in Doctrine of Judicial Precedent"

Download file to see previous pages

The judges/courts will explain how the relevant law is applicable in practice to the problems the courts are seized of during the litigation process. The meanings of the words appearing in the statutes of Parliament are interpretable by the judges following Statutory rules and Common law rules. The statutory method consists of Interpretation Act 1978 and Internal or Intrinsic aids while the Common law method consists of literal rule by which courts render plain meaning to the words irrespective of the result, golden rule by which courts adopt the meaning of the words more appealing to common sense in the case of more than one meaning being attributed to the word in question, mischief rule by which the judge has to interpret in the light of knowledge if the law has a defect or mischief, ejusdem generic rule which requires words must be interpreted as a person or thing belonging to the same class or genus, expressio unius est exclusion alterius rule which means that in case of a rule mentioning one or more things, other should be excluded oscitus a soccis rule which requires to follow the contextual meaning of a word in question. Further, there are presumptions and the use of extrinsic material. The presumptions entail that courts can make various assumptions such as act not with retrospective effect, not binding the crown, not altering the common law, restricting personal liberty, and creating criminal liability. The extrinsic materials serve as sources of information. They are International Conventions and Treaties, Law Commission Reports, and Hansard proceedings which once had not been allowed to be used for statutory interpretation.

Judicial precedent is a common law system by which a precedent serves as an authority, principle, or rule established in litigation formerly decided.  This becomes a binding or persuasive precedent for lower courts or tribunals to be followed in deciding future cases with similar facts or issues. The precedent appears in various forms. They are precedent in action that refers to the judge’s speech in a judgment, European Court of Justice (ECJ) since all the English courts are bound by the ECJ concerning European law with effect from 1973, The Supreme Court (formerly House of Lords) as this is the highest domestic court of appeal serving as the judicial authority which the House of Lords enjoyed formerly. Court of appeal whose decisions are binding on the High Court and whose decisions are bound to the Supreme Court, Divisional Courts who are bound by the decisions of Supreme Court and Court of Appeal and High Court which is bound by the decisions of Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal and Divisional Court and not by another High court judge.

It would be clear therefore judiciary’s function is not to simply apply the laws but to interpret them and establish binding precedents. It is because there are difficulties in drafting out legislation and there are chances of unintended meanings and ambiguities creeping in the statutes. In many cases, the Parliament’s intent will be very clear in which case it will unambiguously facilitate Court’s interpretation.

Courts are enabled to overrule their own previous decisions through judicial interpretation. In Anderton v Ryan (1985), the House of Lords had interpreted the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 in such a manner making the Act itself ineffective. However, the House of Lords giving credence to academic criticisms of the decision, admitted its errors and overruled its own decision in Anderton v Ryan (1985) while deciding in R v Shivpuri (1986) just after one year. In this, Lord Bridge observed that in cases of ambiguous nature, the strict judicial precedent can be departed as mentioned in the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) 1966 1 WLR 1234.

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 4”, n.d.)
Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 4. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1467933-business-law-essay
(Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 4)
Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 4. https://studentshare.org/law/1467933-business-law-essay.
“Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 4”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1467933-business-law-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Statutory Interpretation in Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

Comparison of US and UK Court Practice

'The doctrine of binding precedent was, therefore, an example of a shift away from considering law as a set of principles existing outside the judges who applied them and toward an image of law as a statement issued by a government institution4'.... The paper "Comparison of US and UK Court Practice" tells that It is possible in the United States tradition to overturn precedent.... This is because it is up to the Lords themselves to determine if precedent applies....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a Judicial Precedent

The paper 'In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a judicial precedent?... he golden rule is a statutory interpretation rule in which the courts deviate from the literal meaning of words of a statute to ensure that the interpretation of the statute is reasonable and consistent.... illuminates how the case law is developing in different judicial instances - the court of appeal, the Supreme Court, the judicial court of the EU, which precedents are not applicable as sources of law in the case law etc....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Do Judges Make the Law or Find It

In common law countries, the case law left behind by the judges is used in applying to other cases that relate to the previous ones based on the doctrine of judicial precedent.... It has been argued to a greater extent that the doctrine of judicial precedent is an indirect way in which judges make law.... The doctrine of separation of powers stipulates that each branch of the government should not interfere with the mandate and roles of the other branch and each branch should be allowed to operate independently....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Doctrine of Judicial Precedence and Statutory Interpretation in England and Wales

This essay "doctrine of judicial Precedence and Statutory Interpretation in England and Wales" focuses on Judicial precedence and statutory interpretation are an integral part of the application of law in both England and Wales for the determination of points of law.... The presentation of cases with unique characteristics that may not allow the application of the doctrine of judicial precedence has also made the legislature ensure that the laws are tailored to meet the current circumstances....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

The present study is a work on particular jurisprudence since it seeks the correct positioning of the doctrine of judicial precedent within the English legal system.... Many a legal theorists and commentators have agreed upon the view that the sophistication of the English legal system cannot be understood without grasping the centrality of the doctrine of judicial precedent in it.... The doctrine of judicial precedent has undergone profound transformations from Eighteenth century onwards in accordance with the changing world....
26 Pages (6500 words) Thesis

Statutory Interpretation Within the Courts

Moreover, the essay will explore how the canon of judicial precedent employs statutory interpretation.... In addition, statutory interpretation is not regulated by the parliament which is the maker of laws but by the court In this essay, the primary purpose is to identify the standard powers available to the courts in England and wales in association with statutory interpretation.... his is the first rule of statutory interpretation where the court is expected to assess the common and basic understanding and meaning of a provision....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Judicial Function in Creating Common Laws

good example of judicial creation of law where the judges face legal situations that lack clear guidance of statute and case precedents is the case of Donoghue v.... The paper "judicial Function in Creating Common Laws" discusses that role of judges extends to interpreting laws and in some cases, the judicial function has seen the creation of common laws.... judicial law-making role in the English judicial system is evidenced by the common law that has resulted from court decisions and numerous interpretations of parliament statutes....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Do Judges Make the Law or Find It

In common law countries, the case law left behind by the judges is used in applying to other cases that relate to the previous ones based on the doctrine of judicial precedent.... It has been argued to a greater extent that the doctrine of judicial precedent is an indirect way in which judges make law.... The doctrine of separation of powers stipulates that each branch of the government should not interfere with the mandate and roles of the other branch and each branch should be allowed to operate independently....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us