StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Problem of Pain - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Problem of Pain" tells us about the problem of pain. God, who is benevolent and omnipotent, created the natural world. So if pain exists in the world, then how can God, who is benevolent and omnipotent, be the creator of this world?…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98% of users find it useful
The Problem of Pain
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Problem of Pain"

?Lele Fu (ID # 107342072) Patrick J. Casey PHI 108 13 May Argument Analysis III: The Problem of Pain The Problem of Pain C. S. Lewis begins with the claim that pain exists in the world. He presents the problem of pain as follows: God, who is benevolent and omnipotent, created the natural world. So if pain exists in the world, then how can God, who is benevolent and omnipotent, be the creator of this world? If God were benevolent, then he would not allow pain and suffering to exist, more so, be experienced by his creations. And if God were omnipotent, then he would do everything in his power to eradicate the existence of pain and suffering in the world. However, it is a fact that pain and suffering do exist in the world, and its occurrence is beyond our control, for the very concept of God is pre-established in our ontology, for, by definition, we understand God as a benevolent and omnipotent creator. Thus, if God were not benevolent, then there would be no problem of pain and suffering. Therefore, either God is not benevolent or he is not omnipotent, or he is not benevolent and omnipotent. 2. Reconstructing the Argument of Pain The argument can be logically reconstructed as follows: 1. God is the benevolent and omnipotent creator of the natural world 2. If God were benevolent, then pain and suffering would not exist in his creations 3. If God were omnipotent, then he would everything in his power to eradicate pain and suffering. 4. Pain and suffering nevertheless exist as experienced by God’s creations 5. God could not have created pain and suffering, for that would contradict his benevolent and omnipotent nature 6. Therefore, given that pain and suffering exists, either God is not benevolent or is not omnipotent, or is neither benevolent nor omnipotent. 3. Analysis and Evaluation To begin with, premise one is a given premise, which is assumed in the exposition of the problem of pain, that is, that God is a benevolent and omnipotent creator, who is responsible for the creation of our world. So far, this premise does not pose any problems; it is true. The second premise follows from the first premise, since, if God were benevolent, then he would not allow pain and suffering to take place in his creations. So this premise is also true, by virtue of God’s definition. Likewise, third premise follows from the first and the second, for if God were omnipotent, then he would use his powers to eradicate pain and suffering, since by nature, God is benevolent. Thus, the third premise is also true. However, things get a bit more complicated come the fourth premise, which states that pain and suffering exist as experienced in God’s creations. As C.S. Lewis explains, this is problematic for the main reason that what we experience as ‘pain and suffering’ in the natural world may not be ‘pain and suffering’ for God. Likewise, what we understand as ‘benevolent and omnipotent’ may not be the same as God’s understanding of ‘benevolent and omnipotent.’ This complexity is exemplified due to structure of our language. We understand good and evil to be two conflicting terms for instance. So the problem of reconciling good and evil becomes a problem only because we understand these concepts to conflict with each other. Based on the problem of pain, it was proposed that it is due to God’s benevolent nature that the problem of pain becomes a problem; that if God were something other than benevolent, then the problem is solved. This is evident in premise five, wherein it was shown that God, who is good, could not have created something that was not good, that is, pain and suffering. It is in this regard that the author concludes that either God’s omnipotence or benevolence, or both, is thus questionable. However, I do not think that this conclusion will suffice, for the transition from premise five to its conclusion misses an important point. This is as follows: Following premise four, premise five states that “God could not have created pain and suffering, for that would contradict his benevolent and omnipotent nature.” Given this, the conclusion suggests that we either reject God’s benevolence, omnipotence or both. But can we really, by rejecting God’s benevolence and/or omnipotence, resolve the problem of pain? Intuition would tell us that this would indeed solve the problem. However, in the remaining part of this essay, I shall argue that by rejecting the benevolence and omnipotence of God, we do not resolve any such problem at all; rather, we dissolve the problem of pain thereby missing the point. As stated above, the problem of pain is concerned with the question on how can a God, who is benevolent and omnipotent, be the creator of this world where pain and suffering exists. Given this problem, it was proposed that therefore, we ought to reject God’s benevolence and/or omnipotence. Thus we can derive the following proposition, “it is not the case that God is benevolent and/or omnipotent,” as the rejection of God’s aforesaid qualities. Herein, I argue that we cannot resolve the problem of pain in this manner, that is, by rejecting the benevolence and/or omnipotence of God, for rejecting the qualities that define God would nullify the existence of such a God. If something other than a benevolent and omnipotent creator existed, then that would not be God. And if God did not exist, then it would not matter whether or not pain and suffering exists in the world, since we would not have a concept of “benevolence” and “omnipotence” to problematize with the existence of pain and suffering in the world. Therefore, by rejecting any one or of both of God’s qualities, we do not pave the way towards resolving the problem of pain; rather, we end up dissolving the problem and thereby missing the point. It is in this light that any attempt to resolve the problem of pain by questioning God’s benevolence and omnipotence, as what was shown in the article, is logically impossible. Works Cited Lewis, C. S. The Problem of Pain. New York: Simon & Schuster, n.d. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Argument analize 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1421263-argument-analize
(Argument Analize 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1421263-argument-analize.
“Argument Analize 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1421263-argument-analize.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Problem of Pain

The Problem of Pain

The Problem of Pain From time immemorial people have struggled with the issue of evil and of human suffering.... These are some of the oldest and most difficult questions in any theology, and in his book The Problem of Pain, C.... At the beginning of Chapter Two, Lewis examines The Problem of Pain.... Indeed, as Lewis explains: The Problem of Pain is a problem about the order of the universe.... As Lewis puts it, Christianity is not a solution to the problem, but in fact brings the problem into question as it promises something better than pain: “for pain would be no problem unless, side by side with our daily experience of this painful world, we had received what we think a good assurance that ultimate reality is righteous and loving” (21)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Handling Pain - Applying Theory to Practice

This paper "Handling Pain - Applying Theory to Practice" deals with the practice problem of pain and how to go about managing it in the health institution using one of two theories.... The author has selected a middle-range theory for application to the management of pain and then applied a theory.... The purpose of the paper is to identify a middle-range theory for my selected practice problem of management of pain and then use a borrowed theory to manage the same symptom of pain....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Pain Management with Patient with Substance Abuse History

n the other hand, pain management is the removal of pain or the reduction of suffering from those individuals living with pain.... This makes the management of pain in the patients very difficult.... During the research, it will be identified that several hospitals lack the necessary technology and expertise needed to deal with the management of pain in patients with a substance abuse history.... This leads to the challenge of pain management in the patients....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

Love in the Time of Cholera

he problem of pain and the ethics of suicide have been one of the most talked-about issues in the medical world, even giving to some cases of physician-assisted suicide.... In the book, "Love in the Time of Cholera", Jeremiah de Saint-Amour decided to take his own life to end his pain and suffering (Marquez, 2007).... n article, "Suicide does not stop the pain" says that the pain does not really stop in suicide as it is transferred to the immediate family in terms of grief and loneliness (Caruso)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

Part 3 Applying Theory to Practice

The Problem of Pain management has thereby been identified by me as my practice problem.... In spite of pain assessment, appropriate management, evaluatory monitoring and educational research having been included in important guidelines like those from the Joint Commission and the National Guidelines Clearing House, the under-treatment Applying Theory to Practice Angelique Harris Grand Canyon October 26, Applying Theory to Practice Part Globally the nursing profession was facing a great number of problems in patients....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Quantitative and Qualitative Research Study

In this research study, the quantitative research method is used to measure The Problem of Pain management by technique of producing numerical data or statistics that can be transmuted into operational info.... Type of information in Quantitative study In this research study, the quantitative research method is used to measure The Problem of Pain management by technique of producing numerical data or statistics that can be transmuted into operational info.... Basically, in this quantitative research the criteria used included the identification of the problem, methods of carrying out the research, the findings, the barrier to the implementation process and finally the discussion....
2 Pages (500 words) Article

Apologists and the History of Apologetics

The article by Peter Kreeft entitled 'Lewis's Philosophy of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty' published illustrates the style that Lewis uses to get his deep ideas.... The author describes why these three abstract notions of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty are universally desired for human cultures.... ... ...
10 Pages (2500 words) Article

C.S. Lewis on Suffering and Pain in the Christian Life

his paper will answer the question: does the presence of pain, evil, and suffering in the world prove that there is no God?... Lewis on Suffering and pain in the Christian Life" presents Lewis that argues that pain and suffering are essential in the life of a person and should not be used as proof of the inexistence of God.... Clive Staples Lewis experienced anguish and pain, although he did nothing to deserve it.... However, in his many writings,1 he maintains that God exists and pain and suffering are just parts of his great plan for mankind....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us