StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Uncertainty in Microeconomic - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Uncertainty in Microeconomic" talks about the degree risk which the individual prefers a certain income over an uncertain income. This is measured by the distance between the utility generated by the certain income and the utility generated by the gamble which has an expected income equal to the certain income…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.6% of users find it useful
Uncertainty in Microeconomic
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Uncertainty in Microeconomic"

An individual is said to be risk averse if he prefers a certain income over a fair gamble that is associated with an expected income that is equal to the certain income. The degree of risk aversion is then the extent to which the individual prefers the certain income over the uncertain income. In terms of a utility function, this is measured by the distance between the utility generated by the certain income and the utility generated by the gamble which has an expected income equal to the certain income. To better understand this, consider the diagram below. Figure 1: Risk Aversion and the concavity of the utility function Consider a rational individual with a typical upward rising concave (implying diminishing Marginal Utility) utility function U(.) defined over money incomes X. Suppose the individual can either play a lottery where two possible outcomes are possible: X1 a low income and X2 a high income. Further assume that both are equally likely. That is, both occur with probability = ?. Thus if X1 is realized the individual gets U(X1) and if X2 realizes, the individual derives U(X2). Then, the expected income from the lottery is ?[X1+X2] and the expected utility is ? [U(X1) +U(X2)]. The scenario is depicted in the diagram above. Now, observe that the utility derived by the individual from a certain income of ?[X1+X2] which is equal to U?[X1+X2] lies above ? [U(X1) +U(X2)], the expected utility from the lottery with an expected earning of ?[X1+X2]. This shows that the individual prefers a certain income over an above a lottery with an expected income that is equal to certain income. Thus, the individual is risk averse. Further, note that the further U?[X1+X2] lies above ? [U(X1) +U(X2)], the more risk averse is the individual, since the preference for the certain income is even greater in that case. This implies that the more concave the utility function the greater will be the risk aversion of the individual. Now, consider Mr. D’s utility function. It is shown in the diagram below. Figure 2:Mr. D's utility function Mr. D’s utility function is U=which is a straight line from the origin with a slope of. Thus, the second derivative of the function is zero everywhere implying zero risk aversion. Thus, we can conclude that Mr. D is a risk neutral agent. A risk neutral agent in contrast to a risk-averse agent is indifferent between picking a certain income and playing a lottery which has the equal expected income. Therefore, Mr. D is not influenced by the fact that the income from the lottery is attached to some risk bearing which is not true in case of the certain income. The indifference implies that in making decisions, Mr. D would compare expected incomes between choices and pick the option associated with the highest expected income. 2. We shall assume =2 and =3. The resulting utility functions are shown in the diagram below (figure 3). We are concerned with the rational decision in Mr. D’s case. Now, Mr. D is rational if he picks the option that generates the greatest utility for him. In the present context, when =2, if Mr. D tries to earn $60000 the expected income is. The resulting expected utility therefore is $70000. This is point A on the diagram below (figure 3). Alternatively, if Mr. D decides to stay within speed limits, the certain income=expected income=$30000. Therefore, the utility obtained in this case=expected utility obtained = $60000.This is point C in figure 3. Therefore, if =2, pursuing the income of $60000 generates a higher utility. Thus, taking the risk of breaking the speed limit to earn $60000 is the rational choice. Again if =3, and Mr. D tries to earn $60000 the expected income remains equal to. However, the resulting expected utility now is 3(35000) = $105000. This is shown as point C in the diagram below (figure 3). The utility derived from the certain income now is = $90000. This is point D in figure 3. Therefore, the expected utility of pursuing the yearly income of $60000 yields is higher compared to that of pursuing the income of $30000. Thus, when =3, the rational choice still remains the pursuit of an annual income of $60000. Figure 3: Point A - expected utility if alpha = 2, Point B expected utility if alpha=3 when Mr. D tries to earn 60000 and Point C and D are expected utilities when he earns 30000 with alpha = 2 and 3 respectively. Thus, it turns out that when alpha takes any value greater than unity, speeding and trying to earn 60000 is the rational decision. This is evident from the fact that point A lies above point C on the same utility function and point B lies above point D on the other utility function. And this is particularly true in this case since Mr. D is risk neutral. Thus as long as the expected income is higher than the certain income, it generates higher utility to pursue the risky alternative. Another way to state this is that the compensation for taking on the risk makes taking the risk the worthwhile choice. 3. Now, alpha takes values less than unity. We assume 0.5 and 0.75 as the two values for alpha. The resulting utility functions are shown in the diagram (figure 4) below. Figure 4: Same as figure 1, only with Alpha less than unity. As in the case of problem 2, the expected incomes remain the same. However, the resulting expected utilities are different. When, the expected utility for Mr D if he chooses to pursue the $60000 a year earning opportunity is = 0.5(35000)= $17500. This is represented as point A in the diagram (figure 4). The utility from pursuing the riskless $30000 a year option is = $15000. This is depicted by Point C in the diagram. In this case as well, since Mr. D is assumed to be rational, he shall prefer to go for the $60000 annual earning. If, on the other hand , the expected utility from pursuing the risky option of $60000 generates an expected utility of $26250 whereas going for the risk free option of $30000 results in an expected (=certain) utility of $22500. Therefore, going for the risky option is again the rational choice. Thus, even in this case, where alpha takes values less than unity, Mr.D will prefer to try to earn $60000 as well. Although this is associated with greater risk, this is the rational choice since Mr. D is risk neutral. Observe again as in problem 2, inspite of alpha taking values smaller than unity, point A lies above and to the right of point C on the lower utility function and point B lies above and to the right of point D on the higher utility function. Thus, as long as the expected earning is higher than the certain earning of $30000, he gains higher utility. 4. Although the utility functions undergo no change, the expected income from trying to earn $60000 falls. This is the result of the fact that due to additional preventive measures the probability of getting caught while over speeding has shot up to 0.9 implying the complementary probability of not getting caught while over speeding has fallen to 0.1. Now, the expected income from trying to earn $60000 is = 0.9(10000) +0.1(60000) = 9000+6000 = 15000. The certain income still is 30000. In the context of problem 2, if, the expected utility from the risky option is $30000 while that from the risk free option is $60000. Therefore, now it is rational to go for the risk free option of staying within the speed limits. Similarly if, the expected utility from the risky option is $45000 while the (certain=expected) utility from the risk free option is $90000. Thus, the risk free option is rational in this case as well. In the context of problem 4, when, the expected utility from the risky option = $7500 while it is = $15000 from the certain option. Again if , the expected utility from the risky option of crossing the speed limit to pursue the higher annual income is $11250 while that from the safe option of staying within speed limits is $$22500. Thus, the rational choice would be to go for the risk free option of earning $30000 annually since if generates a higher expected utility. Thus, in both situations of problems 2 and 3, Mr. D will go for the certain income by staying within the speed limits. Therefore, the fundamental conclusion from these problems is that given an individual is risk neutral, the rational choice will always be to pursue a gamble that has a higher expected income compared to any given certain income. In problems 2 and 3, pursuing the risky option generated higher expected utility compared to the certain utility of pursuing the risk free option. This was the result of the fact that the chances of getting caught were equal to the chances of getting away while over speeding. As a result, regardless of whether alpha took values greater or lesser than unity, going for the risky option generated a higher expected utility compared to the safe option. However, in case of problem 4, because of additional precautions taken by authorities, the risk of getting caught increased substantially. Consequently, the expected utility from going for the risky option fell considerably. As we found out, the expected utility from the risky option was smaller than the utility of going for the safe option regardless of whether alpha was greater or less than unity. Thus, the rational choice became going for the risk less option of staying within speed limits and earning $30000 a year. Reference Varian H (2003), Intermediate Microeconomics: a modern approach, London:Norton. Appendix The Excel sheet: Y U (alpha=0.5) U(alpha=0.75) U(alpha = 2) U(alpha = 3) 1 0.5 0.75 2 3 1.5 0.75 1.125 3 4.5 2 1 1.5 4 6 2.5 1.25 1.875 5 7.5 3 1.5 2.25 6 9 3.5 1.75 2.625 7 10.5 4 2 3 8 12 4.5 2.25 3.375 9 13.5 5 2.5 3.75 10 15 5.5 2.75 4.125 11 16.5 6 3 4.5 12 18 6.5 3.25 4.875 13 19.5 7 3.5 5.25 14 21 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Microeconomic principles : Uncertainty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1416655-microeconomic-principles-uncertainty
(Microeconomic Principles : Uncertainty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1416655-microeconomic-principles-uncertainty.
“Microeconomic Principles : Uncertainty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1416655-microeconomic-principles-uncertainty.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Uncertainty in Microeconomic

Economic Analysis, Rule-Based Approaches

The attractiveness of the rule arises out of its ability to foster price stability and ensure full employment through a reduction of uncertainty.... Name: University Course: Instructor: Date: Macroeconomics (Question a) There is always much debate on the concept of rule versus discretion in regulating aggregate demand....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Objectives of Macroeconomics in the United Kingdom

Macroeconomics Introduction This present paper is an essay that largely focuses on macroeconomics and it covers five critical areas pertaining to this subject.... The areas covered by the essay include the definition of the term macroeconomics, secondly, the objectives of macroeconomics, and thirdly, the essay will explain why macroeconomic objectives are significant in the United Kingdom....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Comparison and contrasts of the adoption of Walras' ideas in the reinterpretation of The General Theory

microeconomic factors are specific factors of an industry that influences their operations thus their cash flow; such include allocation, production and distribution.... The economists develop a split in the two concepts by alluding that microeconomic factors affect the populace directly thereby influencing their purchasing power while macroeconomic factors affect the business organizations.... In general, Leijonhufvud claims that economists operate in fear of the unknown a feature that results in reservations and uncertainty especially in price determination....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Risk & Uncertainty - Microeconomics 3rd Year

Insurance covers the insured against loss caused by an incident such as fire and The expected utility function has some very convenient properties of analysing choice under uncertainty.... Explain the proposition that if insurance is not costless to provide, risk-averse Expected Utility maximizers may optimally choose to have full insurance coverage, partial insurance coverage, or no coverage at all, depending on how the cost of providing insurance is related to… An individual is regarded as being risk averse if he prefers to have the expected value of his wealth rather than face a gamble....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Theories and Models of Economics in the Construction Industry

nbsp; Modern economic theory also blends together microeconomics and macroeconomics, using microeconomic analysis as the basis for macroeconomics.... According to Myers (2004), “the study of any specific industry involves both microeconomic and macroeconomic approaches”, especially for a multiproduct industry with national and international significance....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Implications of Asymmetric Information for the Function of Markets

"Implications of Asymmetric Information for the Function of Markets at microeconomic and Macroeconomic Levels" paper discusses to what extent public policy can help to rectify market failure in such situations, and examines asymmetry and market failure and the need of the government intervention....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

The Principles and Motivating Force of Microeconomics

In such a situation, the market analyzes deploy the use of the microeconomic phenomena to describe the theoretical conditions that are needed for perfect competitions.... The most desirable areas of study in the microeconomics include the market symmetric information, general equilibrium, uncertainty principles, and applications of the economic game theory....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Economic Concepts Based in Relation to Laibaz Restaurant

Restaurants are among the many business activities in Bolton.... In the restaurant industry, industry there tends to be economic ups… The various business trends ranging from client entertainment to the corporate travel expenses, the financial markets and the social trends influence the social trends within the restaurant industry....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us