StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Death Penalty - a Sociological Exploration - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Death Penalty - a Sociological Exploration" provides a more profound understanding of determinants of mortality and efficacy that the death penalty ultimately portends, and awareness of sociological changes with respect to the death penalty instituted in the past decades' globally…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.8% of users find it useful
Death Penalty - a Sociological Exploration
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Death Penalty - a Sociological Exploration"

Section/# The Death Penalty: A Sociological Exploration and Analysis One of the most important questions with regards to the field of sociology is with respect to how individuals within society value and esteem the rights of others. Crime and punishment has been a reality of the human condition since the very first humans began to interact with one another. Whereas society and civilization has increased an order of magnitude over the past few centuries, one of the means by which the approach to crime and punishment has been questioned is with regards to whether or not capital punishment is morally reprehensible or should be accepted as the ultimate solution for some of the most heinous crimes. The reason that capital punishment represents the social problem is due to the fact that it is both something that is potentially morally wrong and a reaction to crime that has statistically been proven to be ineffective in reducing criminal activity with regards to the specific crimes that incurred the death penalty. As a function of this two-pronged approach, the following analysis will seek to provide the reader with a more profound understanding with regards to the determinants of morality and efficacy that the death penalty ultimately portends. It is the hope of this author that such an analysis will be useful in seeking to understand some of the sociological changes with respect to the death penalty which had been instituted within the past several decades around the globe. Firstly, activists that oppose the death penalty promote the understanding that the death penalty is merely a form of empty retribution. What is meant by this is the fact that compelling statistics, compiled by a litany of different researchers, indicate that the death penalty is entirely ineffective with regards to deterring capital crime (Worthen et al., 2014). An analysis of states within the United States that employ the death penalty as compared to those that do not, do not exhibit a market differentiation between the overall level and numbers of these crimes committed. On the other hand, activists on the far right of the political spectrum oftentimes promote the belief that the death penalty is morally commanded and should be employed as a means of providing a degree of restitution and closure to the family members who have had others taken from them in such gruesome a manner (Asai & Maki, 2011). Although there is a degree of psychological evidence that closure can be achieved through the application of the death penalty, such a construct does not justify the taking of life; at least in the view of this author as a result of the research which has been conducted. As a direct result of the discomfort that many within society feel with regards to the death penalty, measures to remove the death penalty from many of the criminal justice systems around the United States, and around the world for that matter, have recently been noted. Within the past 40 years, the death penalty has ceased to exist within Western and Central Europe. By the same token, even moderately developed nations within South America and Africa have similarly outlawed the application of the death penalty; deeming it as ruthless and potentially able to take the life of an innocent individual through the fault of an ineffective justice system (Burt, 2011). This necessarily brings the reader to a comprehension of the moral imperatives that the death penalty poses. Said one analyst, “There is no such thing as a truly perfect criminal justice system; at least as far as the determination of the sentence of death is concerned” (Rottenberg, 2005, pg. 4). This also poses a direct hardship to the individual juror and can be a moral issue that they struggle with for the remainder of their lives. As several scholars have noted, even though it is morally reprehensible to sentence an individual to a lifetime behind bars, it is far more morally reprehensible to send it is an individual to death with even the slightest chance that the person who is believed to have committed the crime may be innocent. Critics of the death penalty also promote the understanding that a further level of moral and social culpability that is oftentimes not considered is with regards to the actual prison workers who are responsible for carrying out such actions. Even though it may seem as if these workers have solved themselves of moral responsibility as a function of their civil servant status, even a cursory review of such a statement reveals its inherent flaw. Accordingly, the individuals who are responsible for carrying out these death sentences oftentimes face a situation in which they are psychologically traumatized and become insensitive with regards to human life and death as time progresses. Ultimately, this has far-reaching impacts with regards to those that they love, their families, friends, and anyone that they interact with in society (Edelman, 2006). In such a manner, the broad ranging impacts of this death penalty are not only impacted with regards to those who are sentenced to death, the jurors, their families, but also those who are responsible for carrying out the sentences and anyone that they might come in contact within society. The core realization that the reader is likely to draw is conteingent upon the fact that the death penalty represents one of the few acations in criminal justice from whence there is no means of reversal. The finality of this penalty has encouraged many nations to remove the death penalty from the available options that the criminal justice system has to choose from. The underlying reason for such an action is predicated upon the fact that the process itself is imperfect and has been proven to exhibit key shortcomings (Kaplan, 2013). Whereas this is very much the case with all forms of punishment, due to human error, the finality of capital punishment should cause the societal stakeholder to pause for a reflective moment with respect to the fact that once a life is taken, no matter the preponderance of new evidence that might be presented, there is no way to exhonerate or otherwise rehabilitate the person that has been killed by the state. For such a reason, many of the most developed nations throughout the world have ceased to implement the death penalty as it necessarily creates too wide a margin of error to be accepted by many of these societies. Those that argue against this punishment can point to the inconsistency in application, the failure of absolute proof, and the high cost of implementation as a vital reason for why the death penalty is no longer appropriate for consideration. Moreover, the reality of the fact is that the death penalty is not effective in reducing overall rates of violent crimes; as a litany of statistics within nations that still implement it attest to. From such an understanding, one is left to realize that the death penalty exists solely as a type of procedural and judicial legacy; much as do a litany of laws and standards throughout the globe. However, rather than just representing a legacy that some individuals are reticent to let go of, the death penalty is inherently cruel in that it oftentimes is employed by nations around the globe in a manner that is very un-humanitarian (Mendoza-de Jesus, 2010). Recent examples in Texas and elsewhere of individuals writhing on the gurney for minutes after they were supposed to be put to death serve as a painful reminder of the fact that even though it might be attractive to understand existing technology as efficient and humane, there is still no way to dispose of human life in a guaranteed painless manner. Because of this drawback and many others, it is the belief of this author that the process of the death penalty should be halted and a careful reconsideration for the reasons why such a penalty exists in the first place must be engaged; not only in the minds of individuals in charge of the judiciary but in the minds and hearts of stakeholders within the societies that have previously supported it. Said one analyst, “The hardships caused by the death penalty, coupled with the blindness of the criminal justice system alone, are adequate reasons to halt the practice entirely” (Lane, 2014 p. 1). From the evidence that has been presented, it is the belief of this author that the death penalty is ultimately a social construct that society could well do without. Moreover, due to the fact that so many societies around the globe have come to this conclusion, it only stands to reason that the remainder of the states within the United States would do well to consider such a stance as well. However, it is difficult to come to a determinant and clear moral stance on the issue due to the fact that direct exposure to the death penalty, it’s need, the bills that it may have upon society, the impacts that it may have with regards to the jurors seeking to implement it, and/or the far-reaching impacts upon those who are tasked with carrying it out is ultimately something that cannot be researched in order to be inferred. Rather, it must be experienced. From the information that is thus far been presented, it can clearly be understood that the benefits of the death penalty are far outweighed by its drawbacks. Bibliography Asai, A, & Maki, S 2011, An Ethical and Social Examination of the Death Penalty as Depicted in Two Current Films Made in a Pro-death Penalty Society, Eubios: Journal Of Asian And International Bioethics, 21, 3, pp. 95-99, Philosophers Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Burt, E 2011, The Autobiographical Subject and the Death Penalty, Oxford Literary Review, 35, 2, pp. 165-187, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Edelman, BC 2006, Racial Prejudice, Juror Empathy, And Sentencing In Death Penalty Cases, New York: LFB Scholarly Pub, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Kaplan, AB 2013, OREGONS DEATH PENALTY: THE PRACTICAL REALITY, Lewis & Clark Law Review, 17, 1, pp. 1-68, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Lane, C 2014, The Death Penalty Violates Human Rights, n.p.: Gale Virtual Reference Library, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Mendoza-de Jesus, R 2010., Invention of the Death Penalty: Abolitionism at its Limits, Oxford Literary Review, 35, 2, pp. 221-240, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Rottenberg, E 2005., The Question of the Death Penalty, Oxford Literary Review, 35, 2, pp. 189-204, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Worthen, M, Rodgers, F, & Sharp, S 2014, Expanding the Spectrum of Attitudes Toward the Death Penalty: How Nondichotomous Response Options Affect Our Understandings of Death Penalty Attitudes, Criminal Justice Review (Sage Publications), 39, 2, pp. 160-181, Criminal Justice Abstracts with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 May 2014. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“There is an ongoing debate on the use of capital punishment. Discuss Essay”, n.d.)
There is an ongoing debate on the use of capital punishment. Discuss Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1644763-there-is-an-ongoing-debate-on-the-use-of-capital-punishment-discuss-the-social-moral-and-historical-aspects-of-this-controversial-topic
(There Is an Ongoing Debate on the Use of Capital Punishment. Discuss Essay)
There Is an Ongoing Debate on the Use of Capital Punishment. Discuss Essay. https://studentshare.org/english/1644763-there-is-an-ongoing-debate-on-the-use-of-capital-punishment-discuss-the-social-moral-and-historical-aspects-of-this-controversial-topic.
“There Is an Ongoing Debate on the Use of Capital Punishment. Discuss Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1644763-there-is-an-ongoing-debate-on-the-use-of-capital-punishment-discuss-the-social-moral-and-historical-aspects-of-this-controversial-topic.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Death Penalty - a Sociological Exploration

The American System of Criminal Justice - Death Penalty Should be Abolished

This paper "The American System of Criminal Justice - death penalty Should be Abolished" focuses on the death penalty has gone through severe criticism and opposition in the recent years, and one of the most debated topics in connection with this issue has been whether or not the death penalty should be abolished.... Significantly, the debate concerning death penalty has become one of the most long-lasting and exciting debates in politics and criminal justice today....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Criminal Theory Paper

It can thus be inferred that individuals tend to keep themselves away from crimes when such consequences of crimes would lead them to pain, punishment, imprisonment or even death penalty.... Similarly, the sociological theorists held that the disadvantaged people are more likely to commit crimes than others whereas the choice theorists purported that everyone is likely to commit crimes when they one is provided with conducive opportunities....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Context of Racism in the US

Research Paper Abstract The United States (US) has made considerable improvements in the criminal justice system for ensuring safety of its citizens and maintaining order in the society.... Nevertheless, the criminal justice system of the US has faced issues with respect to discrimination.... ... ...
16 Pages (4000 words) Assignment

Capital Punishment

This essay describes the death penalty in the United States and you will discover a disagreement about where the practice is located in a map of American values and practices.... ed nations and even the importance that the proponents of the penalty attach to it are powerful evidence that the death penalty is an issue of transcendent importance, one that is principally moral and political.... The Supreme Court in the Furman decision ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutional because it is a "cruel and unusual" punishment....
29 Pages (7250 words) Essay

Sociology of Law and Punishment

Introspection Elias offers a particular paradigm for sociological thought which opposes both the structural-functionalist and methodological-individualist tendencies in sociology.... Over the course of the last decade or so, it has become increasingly apparent that modern penalty, especially in the west, is witnessing a more 'civilised process' than in the era gone by....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

How the Death Penalty Effects Family

Some of these inmates have been found innocent, have been exonerated, have been released after years of being sentenced or have been put to death by not having proved their innocence. ... enerally speaking when there is a death involved, the people that stay behind are the ones that suffer and morn.... t is an even more a complex situation when inmates are innocent and placed on death row.... In some cases they have been placed on death row and because their lawyers could not find the way to defend them or because of a lack of economy, they were put to death....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Capital punishment and the death penalty

It focuses on the ethical and legal concerns about death penalty or capital punishment in the United States. ... his article focuses on the ethics of death Capital Punishment/death penalty Annotated Bibliography Andre, C.... It focuses on the ethical and legal concerns about death penalty or capital punishment in the United States.... The death penalty: An American History.... his article focuses on the ethics of death penalty, with the big question of whether it is an outrageous atrocity or moral imperative....
1 Pages (250 words) Annotated Bibliography

3 levels of analysis

This is so even though the death was entirely unplanned or accidental.... Murder and manslaughter are included amongst homicides.... Not all homicides are regarded as crimes especially if there was no criminal intent.... Homicides that are non-criminal include misadventures like....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us