StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method - Report Example

Cite this document
Summary
This report "Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method" presents three theories that were derived in response to societies’ position. The industrial revolution; politics and social order were all factors. Functionalism and Interaction share an emphasis on the existence of a consensus in society…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.1% of users find it useful
Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method"

The [The [The Symbolic Interaction Symbolic interaction and naturalistic method achieved particular prominence in the USA and Britain in the 1960s and 1970s. At that time they formed part of the reaction against those kinds of sociology that had become dominant in the 1940s and 1950s. The attack on these orthodoxies involved political, theoretical and methodological arguments. At the heart of the critique was the claim that the dominant theoretical tradition-notably, structural functionalism-portrayed human society as a natural object independent of and controlling human behaviour. This, it was argued, contradicted the nature of human social action, as well as serving to support the status quo by implying that people could not change society. Similarly, the dominant methodological approach, survey research, was criticized as dehumanizing, as eliminating the most significant elements of human life, and thereby producing a distorted picture of the world. Blumer described Symbolic Interaction as follows: “Symbolic Interaction is a down-to-earth approach to the scientific study of human group life and human conduct. Its empirical world is the natural world of such group life and conduct. It lodges its problems in this natural world, conducts its studies in it, and derives its interpretations from such naturalistic studies.” (p.67) Blumers theoretical and methodological arguments were an important resource drawn on by many of the critics of sociological orthodoxy in this period. Symbolic Interaction grew popular as a theoretical counter to functionalism, and the naturalistic methods advocated by Blumer became one of the most common alternatives to survey research. On both sides of the Atlantic, there was considerable growth in the amount of interactionist ethnography in many fields, but especially in the study of deviance, medicine, and education. Blumer was an important, though by no means the only, influence on those adopting this approach. Most of the arguments currently used to legitimate qualitative research are to be found in his writings. Symbolic Interaction rests on three primary premises. First, that human beings act towards things on the basis of the meanings those things have for them, second that such meanings arise out of the interaction of the individual with others, and third, that an interpretive process is used by the person in each instance in which he must deal with things in his environment. It was Blumers perception that the first premise was largely ignored, or at least down-played, by his contemporaries. If mentioned at all, he asserted, meaning is relegated to the status of a causative factor or is treated as a "mere transmission link that can be ignored in favour of the initiating factors" by both sociologists and psychologists. Symbolic Interaction, however, holds the view that the central role in human behaviour belongs to these very meanings which other viewpoints would dismiss as incidental. As to the second premise, Blumer identified two traditional methods for accounting for the derivation of meaning and highlights how they differ from the Interactionist approach. First, meaning is taken to be innate to the object considered (i.e., it inheres in the objective characteristics of the object). In this view, meaning is given and no process is involved in forming an understanding of it, one need only recognize what is already there. Second, meaning is taken to be the cumulative "psychical accretion" of perceptions carried by the perceiver for whom the object has meaning. "This psychical accretion is treated as being an expression of constituent elements of the persons psyche, mind, or psychological organization." The constituents of the individuals psychological makeup that go to form meaning, then, are all of the sensory and attitudinal data that the person brings to the instance of meaning formation with her. In marked contradistinction to these viewpoints, Social Interaction holds that meaning arises out of the "process of interaction between people. The meaning of a thing for a person grows out of the ways in which other persons act toward the person with regard to the thing," which is to say that the actions of others are instrumental in the formation of meaning for any given individual and in regard to any specific object. The third premise further distinguishes Symbolic Interaction from other schools of thought, insofar as it is the actual process of interpretation that is primary to Blumers explication of the formation of meaning. The other points of view, he avers, view the uses of meaning as being simply the calling upon and application to specific situations of previously established meanings. Blumer insisted that the interpretive process and the context in which it is done are a vital element in the persons use of meaning and formation thereof. This being the case, interpretation is vastly more important than a simple application of previously integrated meanings, but is, rather, an active process of formulation, reconsideration, and revision. "Like other Pragmatists, Blumer has insisted that the meanings of objects are primarily a property of behaviour and depend only secondarily upon the intrinsic character of the objects themselves. Meanings, furthermore, are constructed and re-affirmed in social interaction; they are shaped largely by the actual and anticipated responses of others." Meanings, for Blumer, are a dynamic part of any action through this self-interactive process. Resting upon the three premises is a large body of basic ideas, what Blumer thought of as "root images.... These root images refer to and depict the nature of the following matters: human groups or societies, social interaction, objects, the human being as an actor, human action, and the interconnection of the lines of action." Taken in sum, these "images" constitute the foundation of the Social Interactionist view of human conduct and human society and form the skeleton around which Interactionist theory and interpretation is built. What follows is a brief description of each of these ideas, as explicated by Blumer himself. Blumer contrasts the symbolic interactionist conception of human action with what he calls the stimulus-response model. The latter portrays human behaviour as resulting from the play of external and internal factors on the individual, much as the direction of movement of a physical object is determined by the various forces operating on it Blumer believed that this model, in one form or another, had become dominant in the social sciences: The prevailing practice of psychology and sociology is to treat social interaction as a neutral medium, as a mere forum for the operation of outside factors. Thus, psychologists are led to account for the behaviour of people in interaction by resorting to elements of the psychological equipment of the participants-such elements as motives, feelings, attitudes, or personality organization. Sociologists do the same sort of thing by resorting to societal factors, such as cultural prescriptions, values, social roles, or structural pressures. (Blumer 538) The term Social Interaction presupposes that group life consists of interaction between members of a group (i.e., society consists in the interaction of individual human beings). While other schools of sociological thought treat the actual interaction of individuals as a medium or conduit along which other causative factors are channelled to produce behaviour, it is in the interactions themselves, seen as they are as a process, that Blumer places primary importance in the formation of human behaviour and, as described above, the formation of the meanings that underlie behaviour. The actions of others must be constantly considered in the decision-making process of the individual; thus it is the interaction -- real or imagined -- with those others that is the first and most important determinant of the behaviour of the individual. The nature of human action follows from the ability to make indications to the Self. This facility allows the human being to engage the world as one who interprets it and forms decisions upon which to act from that interpretation rather than simply responding automatically to the environment bases on instinctually-given rules inherent in the organisms makeup. "He has to cope with the situations in which he is called on to act, ascertaining the meaning of the actions of others and mapping out his own line of action in the light of this interpretation." The objects confronted which must be taken into account, it should be noted, include not only physical objects, but the social and abstract objects that comprise the rest of the individuals perceived reality, as well. The interlinkages of human actions are the building blocks of human group life. It is the process of corresponding these lines of individual action to those of others that best characterizes human society. The ability to do this allows for joint actions which are consciously entered into and which can then be referred to without the necessity of segregating out the various individual actions that make them up or identifying the individuals who perform them. Thus, it is actually the articulation of lines of action to the Self, an ability that distinguished human action from that of other species, which gives rise to the collective actions that serve to distinguish human society. Blumer points out that in dealing with collectivities and with joint action one can easily be trapped in an erroneous position by failing to recognize that the joint action of the collectivity is an interlinkage of the separate acts of the participants. This failure leads one to overlook the fact that a joint action always undergoes a process of formation; even though it may well be a well-established and repetitive form of social action, each instance has to be formed anew. This distinction allows for Social Interaction, which concerns itself primarily with micro-level actions of individuals and small groups, to account for the macro-level phenomena which arise out of the actions of those individuals by re-asserting that all action begins in the interpretive process of the individual. In Blumers judgment the proper picture of empirical science... is that of the collective quest for answers to questions directed to the resistant character of the given empirical world under study. One has to respect the obdurate character of that empirical world -- this is indeed the cardinal principle of empirical science. Empirical science pursues its quest by devising images of the empirical world under study and testing these images through exacting scrutiny of the empirical world. So, methodology, for Blumer, encompasses the entire scientific endeavour to understand the empirical world and not just subjectively important aspects thereof. Further, each and every aspect of that endeavour must conform to "obdurate" reality, which implies that methods are subject to testing by reality and subsistent upon it. Also, it is the empirical world that maintains final arbitrary authority in regard to the veracity of any account of it, not any model upon which a scientific inquiry is based. Blumer recounts these fundamental principles of the scientific method to support his assertion that only Social Interaction meets the test of truly scientific procedure, as compared to other schools of sociological thought which rely on more indirect methods of observation. That the adherents of those schools believe that they are not only observing the empirical world and in what they believe to be the only proper fashion (i.e., in conformity with previously established scientific procedure), is not lost on Blumer. He avers, however, that only social interactions methodology yields a true, direct observation. Blumer defines the social world as "the actual group life of human beings" and asserts that very few research scientists will have much direct, firsthand knowledge of the social worlds they choose to study and that, therefore, any conception the researcher forms of that world prior to conducting a study of it will necessarily be limited and that stereotypical images will automatically enter into any model subsequently used as the basis of that study. Blumer stresses the vital importance of involved exploratory study of the micro-level phenomena that comprise any social world to be studied. This last subject best displays one of the principal characteristics of Blumers writing: its polemicism. There is an overarching tendency in Blumers accounts of his theories to attack his detractors in the midst of explaining his own point of view. No attention is given in his discussion of the faults of other methods of inquiry to the danger that direct, interpersonal observation may also skew the data collected by the presence of the researcher, for instance, but each time he seeks to describe an aspect of Social Interaction, he includes an assertion as to why that viewpoint is superior to one not in agreement with it. His cautions as to the dangers of forming theoretical models from incomplete data deserve careful consideration and serve to point to one of the chief difficulties of engaging in social research. In conclusion, it is apparent that these three theories were derived in response to societies’ position at the time. Indeed the industrial revolution; politics and social order were all factors. Both functionalism and Interaction share an emphasis on the existence of consensus in society, although they do differ in other areas. Marxism however deals mainly with conflict of the classes but also with many other issues such as feminism and religion. Reference Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 61-77, 538-40 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words, n.d.)
Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1713516-contemorary-sociological-theory-2
(Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1713516-contemorary-sociological-theory-2.
“Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1713516-contemorary-sociological-theory-2.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method

Intellectual Disability

Children with autism have poor auditory sequencing skills and imitation skills, thus, a special teaching and communication method is needed in order to transfer information to children with autism.... This method uses discrete trail training to teach children using visual cues.... They are happier, less frustrated and more satisfied since their needs are met and their sense of independence is more practiced using this kind of method.... This method can easily be administered, not only by teachers, but moreso, of parents with autistic children....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Consequences of Visual Impairment for Childrens Play

So, vision is very important and is paper will analyze, the importance of vision or how the lack of vision through some visual impairment will affect the overall development of the children, through a journal, The consequences of visual impairment for children's symbolic and functional play written by V.... And with the eye playing the chief role, the children with visual impairment are put at a disadvantage and the journal justifies it through lot of studies and surveys about functional and symbolic plays....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

How can a home corner in Key Stage 1 engage childrens communication

This chapter is taken from an admired book, which is appropriate for undergraduates and postgraduates students who are undertaking research for the first time.... Judy Bell states that her intentions were that this book was to be a confidence builder; a starter book that introduced… I chose chapter 11 ‘Observation Studies' because this will help me carry out my research as this is one of my methods for data collection. In this chapter, she gives tips on how to Bell took a practical approach to qualitative observation techniques....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Symbolic Meaning Creation and Consumption

From the social perspective, it is therefore believed that in a fast paced society there is a greater need for having an individual meaning for the consumers also therefore consumers tends to associate themselves with different products and services and images attached to these products.... This… More expensive the brand is, a different meaning will be attached to it by the consumer regardless of other non-pricing factors such as quality. Discussion on the symbolic aspects of products and goods started to emerge during 1950s and it essentially tried to embody the notion of buying things not based on what they do but what they actually mean to the consumer....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Commentaries on two other students application projects week 3

Through participant observation, the social theory applied focuses on the symbolic-interaction approach which “is a framework for building theory that sees society as the product of the everyday interactions of individuals” (Macionis, Chapter 1: Sociology: Perspective, Theory, and method Detailed Outline, 2011, p.... Chapter 1: Sociology: Perspective, Theory, and method Detailed Outline.... As such, it was also clear that the sociological theory of structural-functional approach which “is a framework for building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability” (Macionis, Chapter 1: Sociology: Perspective, Theory, and method Detailed Outline, 2011, p....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Six Keys to the Arts

This discussion talks that the most favorable issue in this present world is the contribution of museums, as well as, art galleries.... With the vital argument that museums should be free to the broad public also supported by the government.... It is important for the museum to charge a small fee....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Century of Self

Other than Freud's theories that are the point of focus, other sociological perspectives can also be analysed These perspectives include conflict theory, structural-functionalist theory and symbolic interaction theory (Brinkerhoff, Ortega & Weitz 2013).... The Century of the Self is a documentary that illustrates how governments and corporations in power have continuously controlled masses using Sigmund Freud's theories....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Social Stratification in the U.S

" paper examines the four major social stratification theoretical perspectives to enhance in examining the multidimensional aspects through presenting the social stratification perspective of the researcher's family.... The family progress from one social class to the next falls under the functionalism theoretical perspective of social stratification owing to a variety of reasons....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us