StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Role of the Court in the Employment Tribunal - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Role of the Court in the Employment Tribunal" states that whilst the majority of arrangements are undertaken on a self-employed basis in practice, it doesn’t per se mean that they will not constitute employees, which would be protected under the UK law of unfair dismissal. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
The Role of the Court in the Employment Tribunal
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Role of the Court in the Employment Tribunal"

The role of the Court or Employment Tribunal is to decide whether the worker is an employee or independent contractor. With little help from sta y definitions, the Courts have developed various tests. Discuss The legal status of a worker as an independent contractor or employee is fundamental in determining the rights of a worker, particularly in light of the increasingly employee centric protective legislative framework. The focus of this paper is to critically evaluate the approach of the judiciary to distinguishing between independent contractor and employee. It is submitted at the outset that the issue remains contentious particularly in light of the continuous changes in working practices. From a statutory perspective, the legal definition of employee is described under Section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) as “an individual who has entered into or works under……..a contract of employment”. The section 230 definition has been criticised for being ambiguous (Honeyball & Bowers. 2006) and it is necessary to refer to the common law test for defining the status of employee. The statutory provision is bolstered by the Ready Mixed Concrete test (Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions & National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497), which requires an examination of the “overall picture” (Jupp, 2005) The starting point for determining whether an individual is an employee is the “control” test (Honeyball & Bowers. 2006). This was established in Yewens v Noakes (1880 6 Q.B.D. 530), where Bramwell LJ asserted that:“a servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work” (at pp.532-533). However, socio-economic developments in the labour market have changed the shape of employment status, thereby undermining the suitability of the control test as a sole determinant of employment status (Pitt, G. 2007). This was further acknowledged by the Court of Appeal in Walker v Crystal Palace FC ([1910] 1 KB 87), where the control test was given a different slant by focusing on whether the employer had the right to control the background arrangements for the work such as when and where the work was done, payments and holiday entitlements. However, the Walker extension of the control test was further developed into the “integration” test as propounded by Lord Denning in the case of Stevenson Jordan and Harrison v MacDonald & Evans ([1952] 1 TLR 101) “…under a contract of service, a man is employed as part of the business and his work is done as an integral part of the business; whereas under a contract for services, his work, although done for the business, is not integrated into it but is only accessory to it” (at p.111). Alternatively, factors pertaining to the working arrangement between an employer and a worker will also be important in determining employee status such as responsibility for tax, national insurance and labelling of employee status. However, the integration test is difficult in reality to apply to the modern labour market and what Pitt refers to as the “shamrock organisation” where firms have different types of workers including permanent full time workers, supply workers, and the flexible workforce (Pitt, G. 2007). As such, in recent years, courts and employment tribunals (whilst taking account of the integrated test) now lean towards a multifactor approach, taking into account all possible relevant factors and weighing them against each in order to determine if an individual is an employee (Pitt, G. 2007). This was propounded in the leading case of Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security ([1969] 2 WLR 1). In this case, Cooke J highlighted the following non-exhaustive factors as relevant to determining the issue of whether or not an individual was an employee: whether or not the worker provides personal service, control which “will no doubt always have to be considered, although it can not longer be regarded as the sole determining factor”; whether the employer or the worker provides the tools and equipment, whether the worker hires his own helpers, what degree of financial risk the worker takes, if any; what responsibility for investment and management the worker has, and if the worker directly profits from good work. A case that is often utilised as a prime example of the multifactor approach is the decision in the case of Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance ([1968] 2 QB 497). In the Ready Mixed Concrete case, the company had institute a scheme whereby delivery of its concrete to customers would be carried out by a team of “owner-drivers”. The issue was whether the owner-drivers were employees of the company. If so, the company was liable to pay national insurance contributions in respect of them. The company argued that they were self employed and they had been described as such in their written contracts. If we consider the facts of the case, the drivers owned their lorries; had to keep them and maintain them at their own costs. However, the lorries were bought on hire purchase from a company subsidiary, had to be painted in the company colours and the company was entitled to instruct them to carry out repair work if required. Moreover, the drivers were not able to use the lorries to work for anyone other than Ready Mixed Concrete. Secondly, as regards personal service, the drivers could delegate work to another competent driver but the company could insist on the driver himself carrying out the work. With regard to control, there were no fixed hours of work and they could choose their own routes. However, they had to be available when required and to obey reasonable orders “as if an employee”. Moreover, they were paid by results. Additionally, although stated to be self employed in the contract, it was held that the relevant test was the substance of the contract in practice. This was reiterated in Ferguson v Dawson ([1976] 1 WLR 1213) and Massey v Crown Life Insurance ([1978] 1 WLR 676, where it was held that the express label given to the employment status as between the parties was a relevant consideration, however the overriding factor was to consider the substance of the contract between the parties. Furthermore, in Lane v Shire Roofing Limited ([1995] IRLR 493) it was held by the Court of Appeal that even if paying tax on self employed basis, the relevant question was whose business was being carried out on this occasion? If the answer was that it was the company’s as opposed to the individual’s own business, then this was a factor operating in favour of employment status. In the Ready Mixed Concrete case, it was held that a balancing act had to be undertaken and whilst many of the circumstances pointed towards a contract of service, the fact that the drivers paid for and maintained the lorries, meant that the drivers had effectively assumed part of the economic risk under the contract. As such, they could not be stated to be properly under a contract of service and therefore were not employees. However, whilst the Massey and Ready Mixed Concrete tests are clearly practical in considering the substance of the working relationship, a particular problem has arisen with regard to the status and protection of agency workers (Selwyn, 2006). For example, Freeland highlights the fact that: “there is great resistance to the construction of triangular personal employment contracts … [and] there may be great difficulty in deciding whether the workers bilateral personal employment contract is with the end-user or the intermediary … [therefore] the triangular nature of the arrangement may have the effect that the worker fails to qualify as having a contract of employment … of any kind’ (Freeland, 2003, p.55). If we consider the judicial approach, the decision in Motorola v Davidson ([2001] IRLR 4) related to the status of an agency worker and it was held that “in deciding whether the right [of control] exists in a sufficient degree to make one party the master and the other his servant. The right need not be unrestricted”. The Motorola rationale appears to have been supported by the rationale by the majority decision in Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd [2004] EWCA CIV 217 where it was commented that agency workers were more likely to be “regarded as an employee of the end-user”. This approach to the status of agency workers has been mirrored by the decisions in Royal National Lifeboat Institution v Bushaway (EAT/0719/04) and Cable and Wireless plc v Muscat (UKEAT/0661/04/). For example, in the Muscat decision it was held that it would be a brave Employment Tribunal that decided it should not follow the decision in Dacas because it considered it was decided per incuriam”. Accordingly, the above analysis highlights that the judicial approach to determining employee status has clearly moved beyond the original control test, which is clearly welcome in acknowledging the continuing evolution of the employee/worker relationship. Additionally, the recent cases regarding agency workers suggests a judicial acknowledgement of contemporary working practices outside of rigid contract principles when considering legal status. Whilst the majority of such arrangements are undertaken on a self-employed basis in practice (Pitt, 2007), it doesn’t per se mean that they will not constitute employees, which would be protected under the UK law of unfair dismissal. This begs the question as to whether they should be considered employees. The problem is the amount of regulation imposed on private individuals in homecare vis-à-vis the lack of protection for such workers. Alternatively, the Ready Mixed Concrete case widens the parameters of the potential candidates that fall within the definition of employee for the purpose of unfair dismissal law. Whilst these decisions pertaining to employee status clearly fly in the face of established employment law principles, they are arguably necessary to achieve a just result and prevent employer abuse of power in imbalanced bargaining scenarios. However, the fundamental flaw of these decisions is the fact that the judiciary have articulated their decisions under the language of “legal principles” whereas they are in fact case by case determinations. It is submitted that arguably the central problem is that the judiciary are expanding the test for employee status within the confines of precedent and established principles of employment status whereas the complex reality of business/worker relationships requires a case by case approach to strike the necessary balance. Bibliography Freedland, M. (2003). The Personal Employment Contract. Oxford University Press. Jeffery Jupp (2005). Agency Work: A Black Hole. New Law Journal Honeyball & Bowers (2006). Textbook on Labour Law. 9th Edition Oxford University Press. Painter and Holmes., (2006). Cases and Materials on Employment Law. 6th Edition Oxford University Press. Pitt, Gwyneth., (2007). Employment Law. 6th Edition Sweet & Maxwell. Selwyn’s Law of Employment (2006). 14th Edition Oxford University Publishing. Employment Rights Act 1996 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Labour Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Labour Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560372-labour-law
(Labour Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Labour Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560372-labour-law.
“Labour Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560372-labour-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Role of the Court in the Employment Tribunal

The Role of Courts, Tribunals and Statutory Agencies

Claims that involve discrimination, unfair dismissal, redundancy, equal pay, maternity rights, and deduction of wages, are heard in the employment tribunal (Taylor & Emir 2006, p.... It is also vital to understand the sources of the employment law and the role of the relevant institutions that oversee the operation of that law.... This shows the outline of the government policies over the years and in different reigns, an analysis of the recent issues in employment, the reforms at the employment tribunal, and the Beechcroft Report....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Employment Tribunal Is and Its Role in Resolving Workplace Disputes

Thus, claims for breach of contract, wrongful dismissal and injunction applications can be tried in the Courts and claims for unfair dismissal, discrimination, equal pay, deduction from wages, and maternity rights in the employment tribunal.... Employees can make contractual claims in the employment tribunal only after their employment has ended and the Tribunal in such cases can only award up to £ 25,000.... Workplace disputes can be brought initially before the County Court, High Court or the employment tribunal depending on the nature of the dispute....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

United Kingdom's Tribunal System Reforms

However, the employment tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal maintained their jurisdictions (Industrial Law Journal 2009, p.... Moreover, it watered down the role of a tribunal which is to avoid a formal doctrine that would result in binding precedents (Farmer 1974, p.... United Kingdom's tribunal System Reforms ... ontemplation about tribunal reform in the United Kingdom began in 2006.... Sir Oliver Franks gave openness, impartiality and fairness as the three principles to govern tribunal operations (Franks Report 1957, p....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Proposals for the Tribunal System

The admissions authority has the role of admitting a child and complying with the parent's preference unless doing so would jeopardize the efficiency and proper learning of other children.... The assignment "Proposals for the tribunal System" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues on the proposals for the tribunal system.... This department would not engage in any disputes before the tribunal.... The 2001 review further proposed the placement of all tribunal members under the leadership of a senior president to advise, support, and improve the information that would help users to represent themselves where possible....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Alternate Dispute Resolution, the Tribunal System, the Functioning of the LLP

Unlike the court system where the venue is decided as the courts themselves, here the parties have more autonomy towards the way the case is going to take place.... The paper "Alternate Dispute Resolution, the tribunal System, the Functioning of the LLP" states that due to the fact that the partners enjoy limited liability, the blame might never go to the right person and the wrong person might get away with serious blunders of financial nature.... Such procedures, which are usually less costly and more expeditious than litigation, are increasingly being used in commercial and labor disputes, Divorce actions, in resolving motor vehicle and Medical Malpractice tort claims, and in other disputes that would likely otherwise involve court litigation....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Briefly outline the court system in England and Wales, and in particular the role of the Crown Court

the employment tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal are established to hear industrial disputes.... The jurisdiction of the court has however narrowed down to the clergy men of the Church of England.... the court system in England and Wales is therefore distinct and different from the court systems in Scotland and Northern Ireland.... Different matters are committed of sent to different courts depending The Courts of England and wales are made up of the following different courts namely, the magistrate's courts, the country courts, the Crown court, the High Court of justice, the court of Appeal and the Supreme Court which work in line with the European court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights (Clarissa, 2004)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeals Tribunal

Employees can make contractual claims in the employment tribunal only after their employment has ended and the Tribunal in such cases can only award up to £ 25,000.... This assignment "Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeals Tribunal" focuses on the employment tribunal and its role in resolving workplace disputes and the relationship between the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeals Tribunal.... This assignment also discusses some of the decisions made by the employment tribunal....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Employment Tribunal

However, the employment tribunal would be an alternative in case the dispute reaches a stalemate.... The paper "employment tribunal" is an outstanding example of a law essay.... At Acas, there is deliberate reconciliation that has seen 75% of employment conflicts resolved through the Acas Arbitration Scheme in Britain The paper "employment tribunal" is an outstanding example of a law essay.... This paper will focus on demystifying specific tribunal proceeding with a view of undertaking critical analysis on its role in dispensing justice....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us